欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 182-192.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250153

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于扇形速度衰减模型的木材应力波层析成像算法

马永恩,李光辉*(),茅学凯,魏槊   

  1. 江南大学人工智能与计算机学院 无锡 214122
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-19 修回日期:2025-08-14 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 李光辉 E-mail:ghli@jiangnan.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目(LYKJ〔2023〕10)。

A Wood Stress Wave Tomography Imaging Algorithm based on Sector Velocity Attenuation Model

Yong’en Ma,Guanghui Li*(),Xuekai Mao,Shuo Wei   

  1. School of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University Wuxi 214122
  • Received:2025-03-19 Revised:2025-08-14 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-12
  • Contact: Guanghui Li E-mail:ghli@jiangnan.edu.cn

摘要:

目的: 针对现有木材应力波层析成像算法检测精度低、缺陷轮廓预测不准的问题,构建融合扇形速度衰减模型(SVAM)与低速点轮廓约束(LVCC)算法的木材缺陷检测框架,系统提升应力波层析成像的准确度,为木材缺陷的高效检测提供技术支撑。方法: 对成像区域进行网格分割得到所需成像的基本单元,并对每个传感器与其他相邻传感器之间建立应力波传播路径,组成SVAM算法中插值所需的基本扇形,每个扇形边的速度即为该路径上应力波的传播速度,网格速度由覆盖该网格的所有扇形决定。通过计算所有扇形对每个网格的影响速度,并进行加权求和即可得到所有网格的速度值。计算所有路径之间的交点,得到低速点集,对该低速点集建立凸包,凸包区域即为约束区域,对网格进行约束以提高缺陷的预测准确度。结果: 在4个真实木材样本和3个模拟样本上使用Fakopp算法、射线分割层析成像算法(RSIA)与SVAM算法进行对照试验,并在2株垂柳样本上使用Fakopp算法与SVAM算法进行对照试验。在4个真实木材样本和3个模拟样本的对照试验中,SVAM算法在真实木材样本上预测的平均准确度、精度和查全率分别达85.5%、94.1%和89.3%,Fakopp算法分别达79.9%、97.8%和78.8%,RSIA算法分别达80.9%、92.8%和84.8%;在2株垂柳样本的对照试验中,SVAM算法与Fakopp算法均表现出较好的预测效果,在有缺陷样本上用微钻阻力仪在2条路径上进行交叉验证,SVAM算法比Fakopp算法的误差分别低2.09%和9.99%。试验结果证明本研究所提方法在不同类型不同样本中缺陷预测的有效性。结论: 本研究提出的SVAM算法,能够有效地在3种不同类型的数据样本中实现木材缺陷的准确检测,检测效果受缺陷大小、形状和位置的影响较小,表现出较高的鲁棒性。

关键词: 应力波层析成像, 扇形速度衰减模型, 低速点轮廓约束, 凸包

Abstract:

Objective: In response of the problems of low detection accuracy and inaccurate defect contour prediction in existing wood stress wave tomography algorithms, a wood defect detection framework integrating the SVAM and the LVCC algorithm was constructed to systematically improve the accuracy of stress wave tomography, providing technical support for the efficient detection of wood defects. Method: The imaging area was divided into grids to form the basic units for imaging. Stress wave propagation paths were established between each sensor and its neighboring sensors to form the basic sectors required for interpolation in the SVAM algorithm. The velocity on each sector edge represented the stress wave propagation speed along that path. The grid velocity was determined by all sectors covering that grid. The weighted sum of the influence velocities from these sectors was calculated to obtain the velocity values for all grids. The intersection points of all paths were computed to form a set of low-velocity points. A convex hull was constructed for this set, and the region within the convex hull is used as a constraint area to improve the accuracy of defect prediction. Result: Comparative experiments were conducted on four real wood samples and three simulated samples using the Fakopp algorithm, the RSIA algorithm, and the SVAM algorithm. Additionally, comparative experiments were performed on two Salix babylonica samples using the Fakopp algorithm and the SVAM algorithm. In the experiments on the four real log samples and three simulated samples, the SVAM algorithm achieved accuracy, precision, and recall rates of 85.5%, 94.1%, and 89.3%, respectively, outperforming the Fakopp algorithm (79.9%, 97.8%, and 78.8%) and the RSIA algorithm (80.9%, 92.8%, and 84.8%). In the experiments on the two living S. babylonica samples, both the SVAM and Fakopp algorithms demonstrated good prediction performance. Cross-validation was conducted on two paths of the defective sample using a micro-drilling resistance instrument. The prediction errors of the SVAM algorithm were 2.09% and 9.99% lower than those of the Fakopp algorithm, respectively. The experimental results validated the effectiveness of the proposed method in defect prediction across different types of samples. Conclusion: The proposed SVAM algorithm can effectively detect wood defects in three different types of data samples. The detection performance is less affected by the size, shape, and location of defects, demonstrating high robustness. The algorithm provides a reliable solution for accurate defect detection in trees.

Key words: stress wave tomography imaging, sector velocity attenuation model (SVAM), low velocity contour constraint (LVCC), convex hull

中图分类号: