欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

›› 1987, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 463-467.

• 问题讨论 • 上一篇    下一篇

对《试论我国立地分类理论基础》一文的几点意见

沈国舫   

  1. 北京林业大学
  • 收稿日期:1987-04-22 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1987-11-25 发布日期:1987-11-25

SOME COMMENTS ON THE PAPER

Shen Guofang   

  1. Beijing Forestry University
  • Received:1987-04-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1987-11-25 Published:1987-11-25

摘要: 对《试论》一文在同意其中一些基本观点的同时,提出了几方面的意见: 1.指出《试论》中对我国立地分类研究状况的评论还欠完整,我国研究立地分类要走适合我国国情的独创道路,但这应建立在通晓世界各国同类研究并博采众长的基础之上。2.认为造林区划不应属于自然区划,而应从属于作为部门经济区划的林业区划。建议当前可直接把林业区划成果作为立地分类的高层次来应用,而不必另起炉灶。3.认为《试论》中按地形因子来划分立地类型组和按土壤因子来划分立地类型的规定不能作为普遍准则来接受。指出还有研究立地类型之下的细小分异的必要性。4.指出当前有必要研究立地分类的理论基础,但它应当有更丰富的内容和更深入的探索。

Abstract: Being agreeable to some basic ideas in the paper "A discussion on the basic theory of site classification in China", some comments are put forward:1. It is indicated that the review of research activities in the field of site classification in China is not fully presented. The research effort which should be unique, suitable to the national specific conditions, must be based on thorough studies of the world experiences in the same field and their broad utilization.2. It is considered that the afforestation division is not subordinate to the natural division, but a part of forestry division as a sectional economic division. It is recommended that the achievements of the forestry division can directly be used as the base of site. classification.3. It is considered that the rules presented in the paper to divide the site type group according to their topographic factors and to divide site types according to their soil factors are not acceptable in all conditions. It is indicated that the minor differences within a site type are also the objects of study.4. It is necessary to study the basic theory of site classification, but it must be done with more abundant contents and deepgoing exploration.