不同纹理方向栎木微小无疵试样板材蠕变特性

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180409

林业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 76-83.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180409

不同纹理方向栎木微小无疵试样板材蠕变特性

王聪^1,2, 吴强¹, 林鹏^1,3, 杨东², 俞友明¹

1. 浙江农林大学工程学院临安 311300;
2. 浙江省木雕红木家具产品质量检验中心东阳 322100;
3. 浙江省家具与五金研究所杭州 310013

收稿日期:2016-08-05 修回日期:2016-12-20 出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2018-05-28
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金项目（LY16C160010）；浙江省家具检测技术研究中心重点实验室基金（2016J03）。

Orthotropic Creep Performance of Small Flawless Oak Board

Wang Cong^1,2, Wu Qiang¹, Lin Peng^1,3, Yang Dong², Yu Youming¹

1. School of Engineering, Zhejiang A & F University Lin'an 311300;
2. Zhejiang Hongmu Carved Furniture Product Quality Inspection Center Dongyang 322100;
3. Zhejiang Furniture and Hardware Research Institute Hangzhou 310013

Received:2016-08-05 Revised:2016-12-20 Online:2018-04-25 Published:2018-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的]考察高温高湿环境下不同锯切方向栎木板材的弯曲蠕变行为，为湿热条件下翘曲栎木板材展平整直工艺提供参考。[方法]制备4种不同锯切方向栎木试样（分别对应弦切板纵向、径切板纵向、径切板横向和弦切板横向），利用DMA-Q800型动态热机械分析仪测定不同锯切方向栎木试样在不同温度下的蠕变曲线，采用Burger模型和广义Kelvin模型对栎木短期蠕变曲线进行拟合，分析锯切方向对栎木试样各蠕变参数的影响，并对不同取向栎木板材蠕变特性进行评价。[结果]在70~90℃范围内，不同取向栎木板材蠕变和蠕变恢复均随温度升高而增大。在相同应力作用下，径切板纵向蠕变大于弦切板纵向蠕变，而径切板横向蠕变小于弦切板横向蠕变。Burger模型和广义Kelvin模型都可以较好地模拟栎木短期蠕变过程，Burger模型相关系数（R²）大于0.90，广义Kelvin模型相关系数（R²）大于0.99。在试验范围内，相同含水率下栎木试样的普弹模量和本体黏度均随温度升高而降低。在单个滞后时间的Burger模型拟合中，滞后时间随温度升高而增加，90℃时达到最大，栎木在90℃时最接近理想黏性体。不同锯切方向栎木板材本体黏度依次为弦切板纵向 > 径切板纵向 > 径切板横向 > 弦切板横向。[结论]升高温度可以降低栎木本体黏度，随温度升高栎木更易产生黏性形变；栎木板材横向相比纵向更易发生黏性形变；在板材纵向，径切板相比弦切板易发生黏性形变；在板材横向，径切板相比弦切板更难产生黏性形变。

关键词: 栎木, 各向异性, Burger模型, 黏弹性

Abstract: [Objective] In order to clarify the softening and flattening mechanisms of oaks in different cutting directions, bending creep behavior of different oak boards(longitudinal plain-sawed lumber, longitudinal quarter-sawed lumber, transverse plain-sawed lumber and transverse quarter-sawed lumber) were investigated by dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA).[Method] DMA creep curves of oak samples were analyzed and fitting by Burger model and general Kelvin model to evaluate the creep performance of different oak samples.[Result] The results showed that both Burger model and general Kelvin model could describe creep characteristic of oak well, R² of Burger model is larger than 0.90 and R² of general Kelvin model is larger than 0.99. Under the same moisture content, the elastic module(E₀) and bulk viscosity(η_n), which were calculated by general Kelvin model, decreased with temperature increasing from 70 to 90℃. The retarded time(τ'), which were calculated by Burger model, increased when the temperature increased from 70 to 90℃. According to η_n, it was the following order:longitudinal plain-sawed lumber > longitudinal quarter-sawed lumber > transverse quarter-sawed lumber > transverse plain-sawed lumber.[Conclusion] It was suggested that the higher the temperature, the much easier for the oak board flattening. Transverse warp of oak board was easier to flat than that of longitudinal warp. Longitudinal warp of plain-sawed lumber was harder to flat than quarter-sawed lumber. However, comparing to quarter-sawed lumber, restoration of transverse warp for plain-sawed lumber was easier.

Key words: oak, orthotropic, Burger model, viscoelasticity

中图分类号:

S781

王聪, 吴强, 林鹏, 杨东, 俞友明. 不同纹理方向栎木微小无疵试样板材蠕变特性[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(4): 76-83.

Wang Cong, Wu Qiang, Lin Peng, Yang Dong, Yu Youming. Orthotropic Creep Performance of Small Flawless Oak Board[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(4): 76-83.

参考文献

邓彪, 罗迎社, 李贤军. 2013. 荷载、含水率及温度对桉树木材抗弯蠕变性能的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 33(5):124-131.
(Deng B, Luo Y S, Li X J. 2013. Effects of load, moisture content and temperature on flexural creep behavior of Eucalyptus. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 33(5):124-131.[in Chinese])
刁海林, 罗建举, 蔡道雄. 2013.红锥木材蠕变特性研究. 西北林学院学报, 28(2):173-177.
(Diao H L, Luo J J, Cai D X.2013. Creep characteristics of Castanopsis hystrix wood. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 28(2):173-177.[in Chinese])
刁海林, 罗建举, 蔡道雄. 2015.水浸时效对红锥木材蠕变特性的影响. 西北林学院学报, 30(2):217-220.
(Diao H L, Luo J J, Cai D X.2015.The influence of immersion aging on creep characteristics of Castanopsis hystrix wood. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 30(2):217-220.[in Chinese])
端木炘. 2011. 栎木.江西林业科技, (5):17-20.
(Duan M X. 2011. The oak(Fagaceae). Jiangxi Forestry Science and Technology, (5):17-20.
金日光, 华幼卿. 2006. 高分子物理. 北京:化学工业出版社.
(Jin R G, Hua Y Q. 2006. High polymer physics. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press.[in Chinese])
李大纲, 徐永吉, 蒋本浩. 1994. 温度对意杨木材弯曲性能的影响.林业科技开发, (2):29-31.
(Li D G, Xu Y J, Jiang B H. 1994. Effects of temperature on flexural creep behavior of Italy poplar. China Forestry Science and Technology, (2):29-31.[in Chinese])
李大纲. 1998. 意杨木材弯曲蠕变特性的初步研究. 四川农业大学学报, 16(1):99-101.
(Li D G. 1998. A preliminary study of bending creep of Italy poplar. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 16(1):99-101.[in Chinese])
彭辉, 蒋佳荔, 詹天翼,等. 2016.木材普通蠕变和机械吸湿蠕变研究概述. 林业科学, 52(4):116-126.
(Peng H, Jiang J L, Zhan T Y, et al.2016.A review of pure viscoelastic creep and mechano-sorptive creep of wood. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 52(4):116-126.[in Chinese])
王逢瑚. 1997. 木质材料流变学. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社.
(Wang F H. 1997. Rheology of wood materials. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University Press.[in Chinese])
王玉荣, 任海青, 赵荣军, 等. 2012a. 三种实木地板材干缩性能和湿胀性能研究. 木材加工机械, 23(5):9-11.
(Wang Y R, Ren H Q, Zhao R J, et al. 2012a. Study on the property of shrinkage and swelling of three kinds of solid wood floor. Wood Processing Machinery, 23(5):9-11.[in Chinese])
王玉荣, 任海青. 2012b. 3种实木地板材主要物理力学性质比较研究.安徽农业大学学报, 39(6):894-898.
(Wang Y R, Ren H Q. 2012b. Comparative study the physical and mechanical properties of three kinds of solid floor wood. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 39(6):894-898.[in Chinese])
王喜兰, 王晓杰, 王雅梅. 2005.木材的机械吸附蠕变在木材加工中的应用. 内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版, 26(1):121-123.
(Wang X L, Wang X J, Wang Y M.2005.Applications of the mechanical adsorption creep to wood process. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University:Natural Science Edition, 26(1):121-123.[in Chinese])
虞华强, 赵荣军, 刘杏娥,等. 2007.木材蠕变模拟研究概述. 林业科学, 43(7):101-105.
(Yu H Q, Zhao R J, Liu X E, et al. 2007.A review of models of creep in wood. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 43(7):101-105.[in Chinese])
詹天翼, 蒋佳荔, 彭辉,等. 2016.水分吸着过程中杉木黏弹行为的经时变化规律及其频率依存性. 林业科学, 52(8):96-103.
(Zhan T Y, Jiang J L, Peng H, et al. 2016.Changes of time dependent viscoelasticity of Chinese fir and its frequency-dependency during moisture adsorption processes. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 52(8):96-103.[in Chinese])
徐有明. 2006. 木材学. 北京:中国林业出版社.
(Xu Y M. 2006. Wood science. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House.[in Chinese])
Antoniow J S, Maigret J E, Jensen C, et al. 2012. Glass-transition temperature profile measured in a wood cell wall using scanning thermal expansion microscope(SThEM). International Journal of Thermophysics, 33(10/11):2167-2172.
Backman A C, Lindberg K A H. 2001. Differences in wood material responses for radial and tangential direction as measured by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. Journal of Materials Science, 36(15):3777-3783.
Engelund E T, Salmén L. 2012. Tensile creep and recovery of Norway spruce influenced by temperature and moisture. Holzforschung, 66(8):959-965.
Huang Y. 2016.Creep behavior of wood under cyclic moisture changes:interaction between load effect and moisture effect. Journal of Wood Science, 62(5):392-399.
Kojima Y, Yamamoto H. 2005. Effect of moisture content on the longitudinal tensile creep behavior of wood. The Japan Wood Research Society, 51(5):462-467.
Moosavi V, Eslam H K, Bazyar B, et al. 2017.Bending creep behavior of hornbeam wood. Drvna Industrija, 67(4):341-350.
Nakano T. 1999. Analysis of creep of wood during water adsorption based on the excitation response theory. The Japan Wood Research Society, 45(1):19-23.
Schniewind A P, Barrett J D. 1972. Wood as a linear orthotropic viscoelastic material. Wood Science & Technology, 6(1):43-57.

[1]	李安鑫, 吕建雄, 蒋佳荔. 木材细胞壁结构及其流变特性研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(12): 136-143.
[2]	孙丰波;费本华;江泽慧;程海涛;于子绚;常祥祯. γ射线辐照处理竹材的动态黏弹性与温度变化的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(3): 160-163.
[3]	蒋佳荔;吕建雄. 杉木动态黏弹行为的时温等效性[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(2): 124-128.
[4]	张晓敏;孙正军;王喜明;尚莉莉. 杨木径向压缩的黏弹性行为[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(9): 135-139.
[5]	王清文;欧荣贤. 木质纤维材料的热塑性改性与塑性加工研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(6): 133-142.
[6]	符韵林;赵广杰. 二氧化硅/木材复合材料的动态黏弹性[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(3): 101-104.
[7]	蔡则谟. 杉木径面及弦面的木材力学性质的差异[J]. , 1996, 32(3): 254-259.

不同纹理方向栎木微小无疵试样板材蠕变特性

Orthotropic Creep Performance of Small Flawless Oak Board

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

期刊获奖

引证指标

联系方式