欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2009, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 134-139.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20090323

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际自愿碳汇市场的补偿标准

武曙红1 张小全2 宋维明1   

  1. (1. 北京林业大学自然保护区学院 北京 100083; 2. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所 北京 100091)
  • 收稿日期:2008-01-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-03-25 发布日期:2009-03-25

Carbon Offset Standard for International Voluntary Carbon Sequestration Market

Wu Shuhong1,Zhang Xiaoquan1,Song Weiming1   

  1. (1. College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083; 2. Institute of Forest Ecology and Environment, CAF Beijing 100091)
  • Received:2008-01-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-03-25 Published:2009-03-25

摘要:

比较目前国际自愿碳汇市场主要补偿标准的特点及优缺点。结果表明: CDMAR标准是目前能确保项目“碳补偿”额外性的较为理想的标准; AFOLUVCS是在确保项目基本质量要求的基础上,最能体现项目审定和核查成本有效性的标准; CCBS是最能实现生物多样性保护和社区效益的项目设计标准; 生存计划方案是有助于缓解贫困和多重效益的标准。提出我国应该采用AFOLUVCS与CCBS相结合的方法设计和实施自愿碳汇项目的建议。

关键词: 关键词: 清洁发展机制, 自愿碳汇市场, 碳补偿标准

Abstract:

Abstract: Advantage and disadvantage were compared among the main carbon offset standards for international voluntary carbon sequestration market. It was indicated that CDM\|AR (Afforestation and Reforestation Standard under CDM) is a better offset standard on insuring the additional for carbon offset.AFOLU\|VCS is a standard that reflects costs efficiency for validation and verification while still ensuring basic quality requirement. CCBS is standard that achieves biodiversity conservation and community benefits.Plan vivo system is a standard that helps to relieve the proverty and achieved multiple benefits. It was proposed that the combination of AFOLU\|VCS with CCBS should be implemented in voluntary carbon sequestration projects in China.

Key words: Key words: clean development mechanism(CDM), voluntary carbon sequestration market, carbon offset standard