浙江省森林生态产品价值实现对城乡差距的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220777

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: Narrowing the gap between urban and rural development is an important link in achieving common prosperity for all people.Building a multi-dimensional assessment system to measure the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products and the urban-rural gap, and analyze the impact of the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products on the urban-rural gap and its mechanism, so as to provide a scientific basis for formulating and improving urban and rural common prosperity planning and policies in the new era and new journey. Method: Based on the panel data of 11 districts and cities in Zhejiang Province from 2001 to 2020, the double fixed effect static panel model was used to analyze the impact of the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products on the urban-rural gap, and the mechanism was analyzed from four aspects: urban-rural income gap, urban-rural consumption gap, urban-rural employment gap, and urban-rural public service gap. Result: 1) From 2001 to 2020, the achievement rate of the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products in Zhejiang Province was relatively low, and the overall situation was fluctuating.The average efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products in district-divided cities in the past 20 years was ranked as follows: Jiaxing> Jinhua> Taizhou> Zhoushan> Huzhou> Shaoxing> Ningbo> Wenzhou> Hangzhou> Lishui.2) From 2001 to 2020, the urban-rural gap in Zhejiang Province showed a declining trend in general, and the urban-rural development gaps among the district-divided cities were obviously heterogeneous.In the past 20 years, the average value of urban-rural gap of each city was ranked as follows: Jiaxing < Huzhou < Zhoushan < Ningbo < Hangzhou < Shaoxing < Wenzhou < Taizhou < Jinhua < Quzhou < Lishui.3) The impact of the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products on the urban-rural gap shows an overall "inverted U-shaped" development trend with an increase first followed by a decrease.4) The efficiency of the value realization of forest ecological products can influence and narrow the urban-rural gap through the number of non-agricultural employment, agricultural, forestry and water expenditure, and the per capita transfer income of rural residents. Conclusion: All district-divided cities should, according to their respective forest resources, innovate the value added model of forest ecological products, improve the forest ecological compensation mechanism, the marketization promotion mechanism of forest ecological industry and the benefit sharing mechanism of ecological industry development, broaden the path to realize the value of forest ecological products, actively absorb rural labor forces, and improve the level of rural non-agricultural income and forest resource property income, transform the advantages of Zhejiang's forest resources into the advantages of urban and rural common prosperity.

Key words: common prosperity, urban-rural gap, value of ecological product, realization efficiency, inverted U-shape

CLC Number:

S7-9
F064.1

Fanbin Kong,Mingye Cui,Caiyao Xu,Yu Lu,Yueqin Shen. Impact of the Realization of Values of Forest Ecological Products on the Urban-Rural Gap in Zhejiang Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(1): 31-43.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 3

Benchmark regression analysis"

变量 Variable	静态面板回归模型 Static panel regression model				面板矫正标准误模型 Correction standard error of panel model
变量 Variable	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
森林生态产品价值实现效率 Efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products	0.110 9^** (0.061)	0.144 1^** (0.060 6)	0.526 6^*** (0.151 6)	0.511 7^*** (0.146 5)	0.111 0^** (0.064 5)	0.144 1^** (0.066 1)	0.526 5^** (0.210 4)	0.5118^*** (0.1849)
森林生态产品价值实现效率平方项 Square term of efficiency in realizing the value of forest ecological products			-0.070 2^*** (0.023 5)	-0.061 8^*** (0.022 5)			-0.070 2^** (0.027 0)	-0.061 8^*** (0.022 9)
国民生产总值 Gross domestic product		-0.623 3 (0.383 6)		-0.613 8^* (0.406 1)		-0.623 3^* (0.378 9)		-0.613 7 (0.381 7)
农村人口数 Rural population		-3.069 3^*** (0.699 9)		-2.906 6^*** (0.690 1)		-3.069 3^*** (0.786 3)		-2.906 6^*** (0.736 5)
第二产业结构 Secondary industrial structure		-1.977 2 (2.714 9)		-2.393 3 (2.671 4)		-1.977 1 (2.295 9)		-2.393 3 (2.291 6)
第三产业结构 Tertiary industry structure		0.564 4 (3.300 7)		0.371 2 (3.243 3)		0.564 4 (2.978 2)		0.371 2 (3.017 1)
年均降水量 Average annual precipitation		0.000 3^** (0.000 1)		0.000 3^** (0.000 1)		0.000 3^* (0.000 1)		0.000 3^* (0.000 1)
年均温 Average annual temperature		-0.129 2 (0.150 9)		-0.139 1 (0.128 4)		-0.129 2 (0.157 8)		-0.117 6 (0.155 5)
森林覆盖率 Forest coverage		-2.252 5 (2.993 7)		-2.219 6 (2.941 1)		-2.252 5 (3.057 1)		-2.219 6 (3.036 0)
森林蓄积量 Forest stock		-0.000 1 (0.000 1)		-0.000 1 (0.000 1)		-0.000 1 (0.000 1)		-0.000 1 (0.000 1)
常数项 Constant	3.206 2^*** (0.136 6)	23.589 3^*** (5.199 2)	3.089 0^*** (0.139 8)	22.690 34^*** (5.118 3)	2.727 8^*** (0.077 7)	24.826 8^*** (6.184 8)	2.6979^*** (0.079 2)	23.984 8^*** (5.956 6)
豪斯曼检验 Hausman	6.78 (0.009 2)	15.93 (0.025 7)	9.32 (0.009 5)	36.61 (0.000 0)
R²	0.257 1	0.401 5	0.287 8	0.425 6	0.780 1	0.822 2	0.789 2	0.829 4

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

References 0

	程文杰, 孔凡斌, 徐彩瑶. 国家试点区森林调节类生态产品价值转化效率初探. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42 (4): 354- 362.
	Cheng W J , Kong F B , Xu C Y . Study on the conversion efficiency of forest regulating ecological products value in the national pilot areas. issues of forestry economics, 2022, 42 (4): 354- 362.
	何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37 (11): 2127- 2140.
	He R W . Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37 (11): 2127- 2140.
	胡书东. 中国财政支出和民间消费需求之间的关系. 中国社会科学, 2002, (6): 26- 32. 26-32, 204
	Hu S D . The relationship between China's fiscal expenditure and private consumption demand. Social Sciences in China, 2002, (6): 26- 32. 26-32, 204
	黄少安. 改革开放40年中国农村发展战略的阶段性演变及其理论总结. 经济研究, 2018, 53 (12): 4- 19.
	Huang S A . The evolution of China's rural development strategy and its theoretical basis over the past 40 years of reform and opening-up. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53 (12): 4- 19.
	纪江明. 中国民生性财政支出对城乡居民消费差距影响的实证研究——基于1995—2009年省级面板数据的协整分析. 经济与管理研究, 2012, (10): 13- 23.
	Ji J M . Research on the impact of government financial expenditure for people's livelihood on household consumption in the social transitional period of China——an cointegration analysis using panel data (1995-2009) of regions. Research on Economics and Management, 2012, (10): 13- 23.
	孔凡斌, 王宁, 徐彩瑶. "两山"理念发源地森林生态产品价值实现效率. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (7): 12- 22.
	Kong F B , Wang N , Xu C Y . Value realization efficiency of forest ecological products in the birthplace of "Two Mountains " Idea. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (7): 12- 22.
	李京梅, 王娜. 海洋生态产品价值内涵解析及其实现途径研究. 太平洋学报, 2022, 30 (5): 94- 104.
	Li J M , Wang N . Research on connotation and realization path of the value of marine ecological products. Pacific Journal, 2022, 30 (5): 94- 104.
	李普亮. 财政农业支出、农民增收与城乡居民收入差距——基于省级面板数据的实证. 南方经济, 2012, (8): 57- 75.
	Li P L . Financial agricultural expenditure, farmers' income increase and income gap between urban and rural residents. South China Journal of Economics, 2012, (8): 57- 75.
	李实, 詹鹏, 杨灿. 中国农村公共转移收入的减贫效果. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 33 (5): 71- 80.
	Li S , Zhan P , Yang C . The poverty reduction effect of China's public transfer income in rural areas. Journal of China Agricultural University(Social Sciences), 2016, 33 (5): 71- 80.
	刘浩, 余琦殷. 我国森林生态产品价值实现: 路径思考. 世界林业研究, 2022, 35 (3): 130- 135.
	Liu H , Yu Q Y . Value realization of forest ecological products in China: thoughts on the path. World Forestry Research, 2022, 35 (3): 130- 135.
	刘江宜, 牟德刚. 生态产品价值及实现机制研究进展. 生态经济, 2020, 36 (10): 207- 212.
	Liu J Y , Mou D G . Research progress of ecological product value and its realization mechanism. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36 (10): 207- 212.
	刘培林, 钱滔, 黄先海, 等. 共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法. 管理世界, 2021, 37 (8): 117- 129.
	Liu P L , Qian T , Huang X H , et al. The connotation, realization path and measurement method of common prosperity for all. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37 (8): 117- 129.
	李萱, 杨庆媛, 毕国华. 中国城乡福祉差距及其影响因素研究. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40 (2): 1- 6.
	Li X , Yang Q Y , Bi G H . Research on China's urban-rural well-being gap and influencing factors. Areal Research and Development, 2021, 40 (2): 1- 6.
	李晓钟, 李俊雨. 数字经济发展对城乡收入差距的影响研究. 农业技术经济, 2022, (2): 77- 93.
	Li X Z , Li J Y . Research on the influence of digital economy development on urban－rural income gap. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022, (2): 77- 93.
	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73 (4): 637- 650.
	Liu Y S . Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73 (4): 637- 650.
	林瑒焱, 徐昔保. 长三角地区生态系统生产总值时空变化及重要生态保护空间识别. 资源科学, 2022, 44 (4): 847- 859.
	Lin Y Y , Xu X B . Spatiotemporal variations of gross ecosystem product and identification of important ecological protection spaces in the Yangtze River Delta. Resources Science, 2022, 44 (4): 847- 859.
	欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, (5): 19- 25.
	Ouyang Z Y , Wang X K , Miao H . A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, (5): 19- 25.
	王德文, 何宇鹏. 城乡差距的本质、多面性与政策含义. 中国农村观察, 2005, (3): 25- 37. 25-37, 80
	Wang D W , He Y P . The essence, multifaceted and policy implications of the urban-rural gap. China Rural Survey, 2005, (3): 25- 37. 25-37, 80
	吴之见, 杜思敏, 黄云, 等. 基于生态系统生产总值核算的生态保护成效评估——以赣南地区为例. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (16): 6670- 6683.
	Wu Z J , Du S M , Huang Y , et al. Assessment of ecological conservation effect in southern Jiangxi Province based on gross ecosystem product. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42 (16): 6670- 6683.
	许正松, 徐彩瑶, 陆雨, 等. 中国生态扶贫的实践逻辑、政策成效与机制创新. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42 (3): 225- 232.
	Xu Z S , Xu C Y , Lu Y , et al. Practical logic, policy effectiveness and mechanism innovation of ecological poverty alleviation in China. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2022, 42 (3): 225- 232.
	叶璐, 王济民. 我国城乡差距的多维测定. 农业经济问题, 2021, (2): 123- 134.
	Ye L , Wang J M . The calculation of China's multidimensional urban－rural disparities from 2007 to 2017. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, (2): 123- 134.
	张文明. 完善生态产品价值实现机制——基于福建森林生态银行的调研. 宏观经济管理, 2020, (3): 73- 79.
	Zhang W M . Improving the value realization mechanism of ecological products - based on the research of Fujian Forest Ecological Bank. Macroeconomic Management, 2020, (3): 73- 79.
	郑宏运, 李谷成. 城乡政策偏向对农业资源配置效率的影响研究. 农业技术经济, 2020, (7): 79- 92.
	Zheng H Y , Li G C . The impact of urban-rural biased policy on agricultural resource allocation efficiency. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2020, (7): 79- 92.
	Baron R M , Kenny D A . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51 (6): 1173- 1182.
	Tone K . A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130 (3): 498- 509.

一级指标 Primary indicators	一级指标权重 Weights of primary indicators	二级指标 Secondary indicators	二级指标权重 Weights of secondary indicators
城乡收入差距₁ Urban-rural income gap	0.134 4	泰尔指数 Theil index	0.134 4
城乡消费差距 Urban-rural consumption gap	0.228 1	恩格尔系数比值 Engel coefficient ratio	0.074 4
城乡消费差距 Urban-rural consumption gap	0.228 1	城乡消费支出比值 Ratio of urban and rural consumption expenditure	0.153 7
城乡公共差距 Public gap between urban and rural areas	0.524 8	城乡医疗床位数比例 Ratio of number of medical beds in urban and rural areas	0.116 4
		城乡教育支出比例 Ratio of urban and rural education expenditure	0.214 3
		城乡低保人数比例 Ratio of people living on subsistence allowances in urban and rural areas	0.194 1
城乡就业差距 Employment gap between urban and rural areas	0.112 7	城乡就业人口比例 Proportion of urban and rural employed population	0.112 7

变量 Variables	样本量 Sample Size	均值 Mean	标准差 SD	最小值 Min	最大值 Max
城乡差距 Urban-rural gap	240	2.91	0.84	1.15	5.19
森林生态产品价值实现效率 Efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products	240	0.59	0.57	0.1	6.85
国民生产总值的对数 Logarithm of gross domestic product	240	1.64	0.59	-0.13	2.64
农村人口数的对数 Logarithm of rural population	240	5.23	0.86	3.3	7.71
第二产业结构 Secondary industrial structure	240	0.5	0.06	0.3	0.61
第三产业结构 Tertiary industry structure	240	0.43	0.07	0.3	0.68
年均降水量 Average annual precipitation/mm	240	1 520	327.72	740	2 560
年均温 Average annual temperature/℃	240	18.03	0.79	16.3	19.9
森林覆盖率 Forest coverage	240	0.56	0.24	0.01	0.93
森林蓄积量Forest stock/m³	240	1.906 5×10⁷	1.945 18×10⁷	2.328×10⁵	9.885 83×10⁷
农村居民人均林业收入的对数 Logarithm of per capita forestry income of rural residents	240	0.08	0.04	0.01	0.21
农林水事务支出的对数 Logarithm of expenditure on agriculture, forestry and water affairs	240	3.42	1.54	-0.55	7.29
非农就业人数的对数 Logarithm of nonfarm payrolls	240	5.07	1.01	3.08	7.74
农村居民转移收入比例 Proportion of transferred income of rural residents	240	-3.45	-3.14	-7.65	-0.08

变量 variable	时间趋势系数 Time trend coefficient	变量 variable	时间趋势系数 Time trend coefficient
Effi*Year₂₀₀₁	0.144 3^**(0.059 7)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₃	-1.037 5^***(0.359 2)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₂	-0.042 9(0.167 9)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₄	-1.145 1^***(0.389 5)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₃	-0.235 5(0.178 5)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₅	-1.478 0^***(0.423 2)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₄	-0.272 9(0.188 0)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₆	-1.713 9^***(0.447 4)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₅	-0.399 5^**(0.218 3)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₇	-1.683 0^***(0.479 6)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₆	-0.494 2^**(0.224 4)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₈	-2.104 7^***(0.510 9)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₇	-0.525 3^**(0.246 4)	Effi*Year₂₀₁₉	-2.267 0^***(0.535 1)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₈	-0.529 4^**(0.257 4)	Effi*Year₂₀₂₀	-2.392 7^***(0.560 9)
Effi*Year₂₀₀₉	-0.521 7^**(0.278 3)	Cons	26.258 5^***(4.066 9)
Effi*Year₂₀₁₀	-0.702 1^**(0.306 5)	是否控制变量 Whether to control variables	Yes
Effi*Year₂₀₁₁	-0.755 9^**(0.319 2)	是否控制变量 Whether to control variables	Yes
Effi*Year₂₀₁₂	-0.786 0^**(0.344 0)	拟合优度 within_R²	0.368 2

项目Item	GAP
项目Item	可行的广义最小二乘法 Feasible Generalized Least Squares	更改研究个体 Change Study Individual	将森林生态产品价值实现效率滞后一期处理 Lag the efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products for one Phase
森林生态产品价值实现效率 Efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products	0.061 6^**(0.035 6)	0.724 8^***(0.275 4)	0.291 1^***(0.098 8)
是否控制变量Whether to control variables	Yes	Yes	Yes
是否固定年份效应 Fixed year effect or not	Yes	Yes	Yes
是否固定地区效应 Fixed regional effect or not	Yes	Yes	Yes
R²	0.807 3	0.839 0	0.412 7

项目Item	农村居民人均林业收入 Per capita forestry income of rural residents	非农就业人数 Nonfarm payrolls	农林水事务支出 Expenditure on agriculture, forestry and water affairs	农村居民转移收入比例 Proportion of transferred income of rural residents
森林生态产品价值实现效率 Efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products	-0.116 1 (0.111 0)	-0.220 2^*** (0.053 4)	0.065 6^*** (0.022 4)	-0.011 7^*** (0.003 3)
是否控制变量 Whether to control variables	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
R²	0.268 5	0.761 6	0.964 8	0.450 0

Impact of the Realization of Values of Forest Ecological Products on the Urban-Rural Gap in Zhejiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 0

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

项目Item	城乡差距Urban-rural gap
项目Item	城乡收入差距 Urban-rural income gap	城乡消费差距 Urban-rural consumption gap	城乡就业差距 Urban-rural employment gap	城乡公共差距 Urban-rural public gap
森林生态产品价值实现效率 Efficiency of value realization of forest ecological products	-0.276 7^*** (0.086 1)	-0.209 2^*** (0.076 5)	-0.222 0^** (0.076 7)	-0.134 3^* (0.076 7)
农村居民人均林业收入 Per capita forestry income of rural residents	-0.005 6 (0.050 7)
农林水事务支出 Expenditure on agriculture, forestry and water affairs		-0.123 2^** (0.059 7)
非农就业人数 Nonfarm Payrolls			-0.290 2^*** (0.090 8)
农村居民转移收入比例 Proportion of transferred income of rural residents				5.184 6^*** (1.478 5)
是否控制变量 Control variable	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
R²	0.267 3	0.403 4	0.465 0	0.457 4
Sobel Z值 Sobel Z value	1.076	1.91^*	2.104^**	-2.291^**

[1]	Caiyao Xu,Ning Wang,Fanbin Kong,Yueqin Shen. Impact of Value Realization of Forest Ecological Products on County Level Development Gaps: A Case Study of 26 Counties in Mountainous Regions of Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(1): 12-30.
[2]	Wenmei Liao,Jing Lin,Yueqin Shen,Fanbin Kong. Influence of Socialized Forestry Services on the Income Gap of Rural Households [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(1): 59-73.
[3]	Dan Pan,Luyi Luo,Yi Yu,Fanbin Kong. Influence of Forest Resource Development Project on the Urban-Rural Income Gap in Old Revolutionary Regions [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(1): 74-89.
[4]	Fanbin Kong,Ning Wang,Caiyao Xu. Value Realization Efficiency of Forest Ecological Products in the Birthplace of "Two Mountains " Idea [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(7): 12-22.