Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 79-87.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20210803
• Research papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zongming Cai1(),Zhiwen Deng1,Bingjun Li1,Shikun Li2,Weiqing Wen2,Jundong Rong1,Yushan Zheng1,Liguang Chen1,*
Received:
2021-10-26
Online:
2023-04-25
Published:
2023-07-05
Contact:
Liguang Chen
E-mail:462081255@qq.com
CLC Number:
Zongming Cai,Zhiwen Deng,Bingjun Li,Shikun Li,Weiqing Wen,Jundong Rong,Yushan Zheng,Liguang Chen. Effects of Strip-cutting Width on the Structural Characteristics of Underground Bamboo Rhizome in Moso Bamboo Forests[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(4): 79-87.
Table 1
Information of sampling plots before cutting"
采伐 类型 Type | 带宽 Width/ m | 密度 Density/(plant·hm?2) | 平均胸径 Mean DBH/ cm | 平均高 Mean height/ m | 年龄结构 Ratio of age (Ⅰ∶Ⅱ∶Ⅲ) | 坡度 Gradient/(°) | 海拔 Elevation/ m |
保留带 Leave strip | 6 | 2171±138 | 8.3±0.54 | 8.9±0.29 | 0.20∶0.64∶0.16 | 22 | 414 |
8 | 2468±170 | 8.8±0.08 | 9.2±0.19 | 0.31∶0.52∶0.17 | 25 | 420 | |
10 | 2314±155 | 8.4±0.30 | 9.4±0.79 | 0.25∶0.49∶0.26 | 26 | 439 | |
采伐带 Cutting strip | 6 | 2163±156 | 7.9±0.55 | 8.1±0.42 | 0.21∶0.63∶0.16 | 23 | 416 |
8 | 2528±106 | 8.2±0.23 | 8.3±0.26 | 0.23∶0.55∶0.22 | 26 | 422 | |
10 | 2102±104 | 7.7±0.18 | 8.6±0.53 | 0.35∶0.44∶0.21 | 28 | 443 |
Table 2
Quantity characteristics of P. edulis rhizomes harvested with different widths"
经营方式 Type | 带宽 Didth/m | 总鞭长 Total rhizome Length/(cm·m?2) | 平均鞭径 Average rhizome diameter/ cm | 平均节间长 Average internode Length/ cm | 鞭节数 Number of flagellum nodes/(node·m?2) | 鞭干质量 Rhizome weight/ (g·m?2) |
采伐带 Cutting strip | 6 | 363.83±53.26b | 2.53±0.06ab | 6.08±0.20a | 59.33±7.62b | 855.39±143.52b |
8 | 721.17±82.48a | 2.31±0.09b | 5.95±0.63a | 146.00±8.15a | 1 688.64±267.22a | |
10 | 456.33±104.90ab | 2.59±0.03a | 5.10±0.51a | 79.33±22.67b | 1321.15±106.36ab | |
均值 Mean | 513.78 | 2.47 | 5.71 | 94.89 | 1288.39 | |
保留带 Leave strip | 6 | 305.63±18.06b | 2.46±0.07a | 5.62±022a | 54.67±4.70c | 518.32±51.28b |
8 | 495.00±32.63a | 2.48±0.08a | 4.23±0.29b | 117.00±1.16a | 1 095.31±193.83a | |
10 | 399.50±51.50ab | 2.60±0.18a | 5.48±0.41a | 72.33±4.26b | 1 056.33±137.99a | |
均值 Mean | 400.04 | 2.51 | 5.11 | 81.33 | 889.99 |
Table 3
Changes in the number of P. edulis rhizomes between cutting and retention zones of different widths"
带宽 Width/m | 总鞭长 Total rhizome length (%) | 平均鞭径 Average rhizome diameter (%) | 平均节间长 Average internode Length (%) | 鞭节数 Number of rhizome nodes (%) | 鞭干质量 Rhizome weight (%) |
6 | 19.04* | 2.98 | 8.24 | 8.52 | 65.03* |
8 | 45.69* | ?6.86 | 40.58* | 24.79* | 54.17* |
10 | 14.23 | ?0.64 | ?6.93 | 9.68 | 25.07* |
Table 4
Quantity characteristics of P. edulis rhizomes with different width band cutting ages"
采伐类型 Type | 鞭龄 Age | 带宽 Width/ m | 总鞭长 Total rhizome length / (cm·m?2) | 平均鞭径 Average rhizome diameter/ cm | 平均节间长 Average internode length/ cm | 鞭节数 Number of rhizome nodes/ (node·m?2) | 鞭干质量 Rhizome weight/ (g·m?2) |
采伐带 Cutting strip | 幼龄鞭 Young rhizome | 6 | 163.09±8.97b | 2.24±0.13a | 5.56±0.82a | 27.00±7.51b | 338.22±23.67b |
8 | 325.75±12.26a | 2.41±0.07a | 5.90±1.04a | 50.00±1.53a | 637.21±20.64a | ||
10 | 150.50±27.73b | 2.59±0.25a | 4.61±0.18a | 34.67±7.54ab | 343.56±78.21b | ||
壮龄鞭 Age rhizome | 6 | 317.75±46.25a | 2.55±0.11a | 5.91±0.17a | 53.50±8.50a | 864.05±248.14a | |
8 | 352.50±22.79a | 2.61±0.03a | 5.43±0.34a | 64.33±7.22a | 814.40±45.20a | ||
10 | 149.00±37.75b | 2.35±0.13a | 7.16±0.67a | 22.00±6.11b | 359.70±70.94b | ||
老龄鞭 Aging rhizome | 6 | 72.00±2.00a | 2.88±0.12a | 6.59±0.42a | 11.00±1.00a | 146.76±18.11a | |
8 | 141.00±49.00a | 2.48±0.08a | 5.38±0.75a | 27.50±12.50a | 355.03±71.63a | ||
10 | 163.17±43.23a | 2.71±0.12a | 4.79±0.99a | 39.33±12.57a | 378.08±106.82a | ||
保留带 Leave strip | 幼龄鞭 Young rhizome | 6 | 156.46±21.98b | 2.34±0.07b | 5.65±0.14a | 27.67±3.51b | 285.23±28.72b |
8 | 218.33±43.62a | 2.50±0.09a | 4.05±0.35b | 54.33±12.90a | 402.34±88.21a | ||
10 | 126.40±17.31b | 2.31±0.04b | 5.60±1.20a | 23.00±4.36b | 227.94±27.71b | ||
壮龄鞭 Age rhizome | 6 | 140.33±3.93b | 2.36±0.18a | 5.48±0.10a | 25.67±1.20a | 332.07±36.43a | |
8 | 235.29±28.91a | 2.45±0.08a | 5.93±0.26a | 47.67±15.19a | 441.73±233.55a | ||
10 | 128.78±16.89b | 2.54±0.08a | 6.00±0.34a | 21.33±1.76a | 316.80±69.56a | ||
老龄鞭 Aging rhizome | 6 | 90.17±6.17a | 2.48±0.02a | 5.68±0.33a | 16.00±2.00a | 216.55±3.63a | |
8 | 89.74±10.26a | 2.85±0.05a | 5.28±0.52a | 17.50±3.50a | 198.93±24.27a | ||
10 | 90.09±3.92a | 2.74±0.24a | 6.04±0.91a | 17.89±1.11a | 259.87±27.69a |
Table 5
Changes in the number of P. edulis rhizomes at different ages between cutting and retention zones with different widths"
鞭龄Rhizome age | 带宽 Width/m | 总鞭长 Total rhizome Length (%) | 平均鞭径 Average rhizome diameter (%) | 平均节间长 Average internode length (%) | 鞭节数 Number of rhizome nodes (%) | 鞭干质量 Rhizome quality (%) |
幼龄鞭 Young rhizome | 6 | 4.23 | ?4.41 | ?1.53 | ?2.4 | 18.58 |
8 | 49.20* | ?3.34 | 45.48* | ?7.98 | 58.38* | |
10 | 19.06 | 12.26 | ?17.74 | 50.74* | 50.73 * | |
壮龄鞭 Age rhizome | 6 | 126.43* | 7.99 | 7.76 | 108.44* | 160.20* |
8 | 23.56* | 6.39 | ?8.44 | 34.95* | 60.19* | |
10 | 15.70 | ?7.48 | 19.37 | 3.14 | 13.54 | |
老龄鞭 Aging rhizome | 6 | ?20.15* | 16.13 | 9.57 | ?31.25* | ?32.23* |
8 | ?40.07* | 0.88 | ?22.10* | ?42.31* | ?19.63 | |
10 | 80.95* | 9.27 | ?15.54 | 145.81* | 74.59* |
Table 6
Quantity characteristics ofP. edulis rhizomes in different width band cutting soil layers"
采伐 类型 Type | 土层深度 Soil depth | 带宽 Width/m | 总鞭长 Total rhizome length/(cm·m?2) | 平均鞭径 Average rhizome diameter/m | 平均节间长 Average internode length/cm | 鞭节数 Number of flagellum nodes/(node·m?2) | 鞭干质量 Rhizome quality(g·m?2) |
采伐带 Cutting strip | 0~20 | 6 | 154.00±16.40b | 2.57±0.17a | 6.28±0.28a | 24.67±2.85b | 391.31±24.04b |
8 | 452.67±72.75a | 2.54±0.03a | 5.71±0.92a | 90.00±27.43a | 945.65±29.26a | ||
10 | 358.67±75.90ab | 2.30±0.07a | 5.49±0.23a | 64.67±13.53ab | 692.89±152.58ab | ||
20~40 | 6 | 128.49±9.54c | 2.46±0.04b | 5.72±0.33a | 22.67±2.40c | 322.36±38.98c | |
8 | 427.97±59.53a | 2.70±0.04a | 5.49±0.27a | 70.00±6.00a | 850.00±4.19a | ||
10 | 247.10±4.82b | 2.54±0.05ab | 6.06±0.31a | 37.67±1.86b | 613.99±84.66b | ||
保留带 Leave strip | 0~20 | 6 | 160.87±11.84b | 2.27±0.01a | 4.68±0.29a | 28.33±6.89b | 310.11±33.65b |
8 | 250.33±23.24a | 2.53±0.15a | 5.53±0.84a | 48.00±6.25a | 650.95±85.59a | ||
10 | 198.83±8.13ab | 2.48±0.05a | 5.80±0.44a | 37.67±1.45ab | 506.92±37.17ab | ||
20~40 | 6 | 132.88±5.10c | 2.42±0.02b | 5.48±0.68a | 27.33±0.88b | 264.64±46.43b | |
8 | 241.33±10.31a | 2.64±0.04a | 5.20±1.16a | 53.33±10.73a | 666.59±25.38a | ||
10 | 207.79±9.96b | 2.47±0.02b | 6.98±0.12a | 30.00±1.53b | 392.79±91.01b |
Table 7
Changes in the number of bamboo rhizomes in different soil layers of P. edulis between cutting and retention zones of different widths"
土层 深度 Soil depth/cm | 带宽 Width/m | 总鞭长 Total rhizome length (%) | 平均鞭径 Average rhizome diameter (%) | 平均节间长 Average internode length (%) | 鞭节数 Number of flagellum nodes (%) | 鞭干质量 Rhizome quality (%) |
0~20 | 6 | ?4.27 | 12.91 | 34.09* | ?12.94 | 26.18* |
8 | 80.83* | 0.39 | 3.38 | 87.50* | 45.27* | |
10 | 80.39* | ?7.25 | ?5.34 | 71.68* | 36.69* | |
20~40 | 6 | ?3.30 | 1.52 | 4.44 | ?17.07 | 21.81* |
8 | 77.34* | 1.96 | 5.64 | 31.25* | 27.51* | |
10 | 18.92 | 2.83 | ?13.13 | 25.56* | 56.32* |
Table 8
Quantity characteristics of rhizome bud of P. edulis with different width band cutting"
经营 类型 Type | 带宽 Width/ m | 弱芽数 Number of weak buds (bud·m?2)>) | 比例 Percent (%) | 壮芽数 Number of strong buds (bud·m?2) | 比例 Percent (% ) | 空芽节数 Number of empty bud nodes (node·m?2) | 比例 Percent (% ) | 总鞭芽数 Total number of rhizome buds (bud·m?2) |
采伐带 Cutting strip | 6 | 26.02±1.81b | 57.94 | 10.69±0.41b | 23.80 | 8.20±2.22a | 18.26 | 44.92±4.30b |
8 | 54.92±5.17a | 58.11 | 31.90±7.24a | 33.75 | 7.69±2.75a | 8.13 | 94.51±10.19a | |
10 | 32.13±4.55b | 54.93 | 18.54±3.34ab | 31.70 | 7.82±2.13a | 13.38 | 58.48±4.79b | |
均值 Mean | 37.69 | 20.37 | 7.90 | 65.97 | ||||
保留带 Leave strip | 6 | 22.37±6.90a | 55.44 | 12.45±6.03a | 30.85 | 5.54±1.74a | 13.72 | 40.35±11.06a |
8 | 28.95±4.69a | 56.07 | 16.24±9.77a | 31.45 | 6.45±1.63a | 12.48 | 51.64±12.52a | |
10 | 29.09±4.34a | 53.02 | 17.02±2.56a | 31.01 | 8.76±3.37a | 15.97 | 54.88±9.34a | |
均值 Mean | 26.80 | 15.23 | 6.91 | 48.95 |
Table 9
Variations in the number characteristics of rhizome buds of P. edulis between cutting zones with different widths and retaining zones"
带宽 Width/m | 弱芽 Weak buds | 壮芽 Strong buds | 空芽节 Empty buds | 总鞭芽 Total rhizome buds |
6 | 16.34 | ?14.11 | 48.15* | 11.32 |
8 | 89.71* | 96.42* | 19.27 | 83.03* |
10 | 10.43 | 8.92 | ?10.72 | 6.57 |
陈 操, 黄海泳, 龚 鸣, 等. 不同经营类型下毛竹林地下鞭茎结构的年龄特征. 竹子学报, 2020, 39 (2): 19- 24. | |
Chen C, Huang H Y, Gong M, et al. Rhizome characteristics and its age structure in Phyllostachys edulis forests under different management types . Journal of Bamboo Research, 2020, 39 (2): 19- 24. | |
江国华, 余立华, 李占东, 等. 毛竹地下竹鞭的分支系统及其数量特征. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36 (12): 3479- 3484.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201712.018 |
|
Jiang G H, Yu L H, Li Z D, et al. Hierarchical system and its quantitative attribute of moso bamboo rhizome. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36 (12): 3479- 3484.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201712.018 |
|
江泽慧. 2002. 世界竹藤. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社. | |
Jiang Z H. 2002. Bamboo and rattan in the world. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House.[in Chinese] | |
刘 力, 林新春, 金爱武, 等. 2004. 苦竹各器官营养元素分析. 浙江林学院学报, 21(2): 172−175. | |
Liu L, Lin X C, Jin A W, et al. 2004. Analysis of nutrient elements in various organs of Pleioblastus amarus. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 21(2): 172−175.[in Chinese] | |
刘美爽, 董希斌, 郭 辉, 等. 小兴安岭低质林采伐改造后土壤理化性质变化分析. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38 (10): 36- 40.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2010.10.012 |
|
Liu M S, Dong X B, Guo H, et al. Change in soil physical and chemical properties of low-quality forest stands in lesser xing'an range after alteration by logging. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38 (10): 36- 40.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2010.10.012 |
|
孙正军, 费本华. 2019. 中国竹产业发展的机遇与挑战. 世界竹藤通讯, 17(1): 1–5. | |
Sun Z J, Fei B H, 2019. Opportunities and challenges for the development of bamboo industry in China. World Bamboo and Rattan, 17(1): 1−5.[in Chinese] | |
童 亮, 李平衡, 周国模, 等. 2019. 竹林鞭根系统研究综述. 浙江农林大学学报, 36(1): 183–192. | |
Tong L, Li P H, Zhou G M, et al.2019. A review of research about rhizome-root system in bamboo forest . Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 36(1): 183–192.[in Chinese] | |
王树梅, 王 波, 范少辉, 等. 带状采伐对毛竹林土壤细菌群落结构及多样性的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45 (2): 60- 68. | |
Wang S M, Wang B, Fan S H, et al. Influence of strip cutting management on soil bacterial community structure and diversity in Phyllostachys edulis stands . Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 45 (2): 60- 68. | |
翁甫金, 汪奎宏, 何奇江, 等. 不同年龄毛竹笋用林竹鞭根系吸收能力. 浙江林学院学报, 2001, 18 (2): 136- 138. | |
Weng P J, Wang K H, He Q J, et al. Absorbing ability of root and rhizome system of phyllostachys pubescens shoot forest at different ages . Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2001, 18 (2): 136- 138. | |
熊雨露, 周宇峰, 李平衡, 等. 毛竹林竹鞭生长特征和空间结构的探地雷达无损探测. 林业科学, 2020, 56 (12): 19- 27.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20201203 |
|
Xiong Y L, Zhou Y F, Li P H, et al. Non-destructive detection by ground penetrating radar of growth characteristics and spatial structure of rhizomes in moso bamboo forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56 (12): 19- 27.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20201203 |
|
曾宪礼. 2019. 皖南毛竹林带状采伐恢复特征及影响因子研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. | |
Zeng X L. 2019. Recovery characteristics and influencing factors of moso bamboo forests under different strip clearcutting in southern Anhui province. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry.[in Chinese] | |
曾宪礼, 苏文会, 范少辉, 等. 带状采伐毛竹林恢复的质量特征研究. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39 (5): 917- 924. | |
Zeng X L, Su W H, Fan S H, et al. Qualitative recovery characteristics of moso bamboo forests under strip clearcutting. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2019, 39 (5): 917- 924. | |
曾宪礼, 苏文会, 范少辉, 等. 带状采伐毛竹林土壤质量评价. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38 (10): 3015- 3023. | |
Zeng X L, Su W H, Fan S H, et al. Assessment of soil quality in moso bamboo forests under different strip clearcuttings. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38 (10): 3015- 3023. | |
张利阳, 温国胜, 张汝民, 等. 毛竹光合生理对气候变化的短期响应模拟. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28 (4): 555- 561.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.006 |
|
Zhang L Y, Wen G S, Zhang R M, et al. Climate change response using a simulation study of photosynthetic physiology on Phyllostachys pubescens . Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2011, 28 (4): 555- 561.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.006 |
|
张洋洋, 凡莉莉, 王 敏, 等. 带状采伐对毛竹林土壤理化性质和酶活性的影响. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40 (3): 234- 242. | |
Zhang Y Y, Fan L L, Wang M, et al. Effects of strip clear cutting in Phyllostachys edulis forests on soil physical and chemical properties and enzyme activities . Journal of Forest and Environment, 2020, 40 (3): 234- 242. | |
张洋洋, 凡莉莉, 徐文达, 等. 带状采伐后不同时期毛竹林恢复和土壤养分特征. 西北植物学报, 2020, 40 (8): 1407- 1413. | |
Zhang Y Y, Fan L L, Xu W D, et al. Restoration characteristics and soil nutrient content of Phyllostachys edulis forests after strip clear cutting . Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2020, 40 (8): 1407- 1413. | |
赵宇飞. 2017. 毛竹林地下鞭根系统芽库特征与技术应用. 杭州: 浙江农林大学. | |
Zhao Y F. 2017. The bud bank of the Phyllostachys pubescens underground rhizo me system characteristics and technology application. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University.[in Chinese] | |
郑郁善, 洪 伟, 陈礼光, 等. 1998. 毛竹丰产林竹鞭结构特征研究. 林业科学, 34(S1): 52–59. | |
Zhen Y S, Hong W, Chen L G, et al. 1998. Study on structure characteristics of rhizomes in high-yield Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens forests. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 34(S1): 52–59.[in Chinese] | |
周新年, 邱仁辉, 杨玉盛, 等. 1998. 不同采伐、集材方式对林地土壤理化性质影响的研究. 林业科学, 34(3): 20-27. | |
Zhou X N, Qiu R H, Yang Y S, et al. 1998. Effect on roil physical and chemical properties by different harvesting methods. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 34(3): 20–27.[in Chinese] | |
周 燕, 刘彩霞, 徐秋芳, 等. 毛竹入侵森林对固氮微生物群落结构和丰度的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24 (4): 1047- 1057.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17322 |
|
Zhou Y, Liu C X, Xu Q F, et al. Effects of moso bamboo invasion on nitrogen-fixing microbial community structure and abundance in forest. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24 (4): 1047- 1057.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17322 |
|
Grand S, Lavkulich L M. Effects of forest harvest on soil carbon and related variables in canadian spodosols. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 76 (5): 1816- 1827.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0103 |
|
Kubisch P, Hertel D, Leuschner C. 2015. Do ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal temperate tree species systematically differ in root order based fine root morphology and biomass? Frontiers in Plant Science, 6: 64. | |
Pregitzer K S, Deforest J L, Burton A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine north american trees. Ecological Monographs, 2002, 72 (2): 293- 309.
doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0293:FRAONN]2.0.CO;2 |
|
Shi J M, Mao S Y, Wang L F, et al. Clonal integration driven by source-sink relationships is constrained by rhizome branching architecture in a running bamboo species (Phyllostachys glauca): a 15N assessment in the field . Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 481, 118754.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118754 |
|
Sun T, Dong L, Zhang L, et al. Early stage fine-root decomposition and its relationship with root order and soil depth in a Larix gmelinii plantation . Forests, 2016, 7 (10): 234. | |
Wang Z, Ding L, Wang J, et al. Effects of root diameter, branch order, root depth, season and warming on root longevity in an alpine meadow. Ecological Research, 2016, 31 (5): 739- 747.
doi: 10.1007/s11284-016-1385-4 |
|
Zheng J M, Chen X Y, Chen L G. Comprehensive evaluation of soil quality at different stand densities of Dendrocalamus minor var . amoenus plantations. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2020, 18 (4): 5985- 5996.
doi: 10.15666/aeer/1804_59855996 |
[1] | Yaxiong Zheng,Shaohui Fan,Xuan Zhang,Xiao Zhou,Fengying Guan. Productivity Dynamics of Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Forest after Strip Clearcutting [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(2): 22-29. |
[2] | Caixia Liu,Junhui Chen,Hua Qin,Chenfei Liang,Qiufang Xu. Effects of Long-Term Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil CO2- and N2-Fixing Microorganisms in a Subtropical Bamboo Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(7): 82-92. |
[3] | Ruixiang Ma,Manchang Huang,Jiajia Zhang,Aoshun Zhao,Xingcui Ding,Zisheng Luo,Shenghui Liu,Zizhang Xiao,Kai Shen. Variation in Respiration Pathways of Post-Harvested Treatment Shoots of Moso Bamboo and the Effect of Hyperoxia Treatment [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(6): 33-46. |
[4] | Shunong Li,Yamei Zhang,Yanglun Yu,Wenji Yu. Study on the Hygroscopicity and Chemical Compositions of Boiling-Treated Moso Bamboo [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 119-126. |
[5] | Enbin Liu,Hongwen Yao,Zexi Ren,Guomo Zhou,Huaqiang Du. Bivariate Joint Distribution of DBH and Age of Moso Bamboo Based on Copula Density Function [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(11): 94-104. |
[6] | Yulu Xiong,Yufeng Zhou,Pingheng Li,Liang Tong,Guomo Zhou,Yongjun Shi,Huaqiang Du. Non-Destructive Detection by Ground Penetrating Radar of Growth Characteristics and Spatial Structure of Rhizomes in Moso Bamboo Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(12): 19-27. |
[7] | Jingxin Shen,Guanglu Liu,Shaohui Fan,Yun Feng,Benxue Chen,Changming Wu,Xizhen Liu. Characterization of Soil Nutrients of Phyllostachys edulis during the Process of Its Expansion into Abandoned Land [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(10): 26-33. |
[8] | Chen Liang, Zhou Guomo, Du Huaqiang, Liu Yuli, Mao Fangjie, Xu Xiaojun, Li Xuejian, Cui Lu, Li Yangguang, Zhu Di. Simulation of CO2 Flux and Controlling Factors in Moso Bamboo Forest Using Random Forest Algorithm [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(8): 1-12. |
[9] | Bian Fangyuan, Zhong Zheke, Zhang Xiaoping, Yang Chuanbao, Su Wenhui. Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil by Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Intercropping with Sedum plumbizincicola and the Impact on Microbial Community Structure [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(8): 106-116. |
[10] | Yuan Zhen, Chen Meiyu, Jia Liming, Wei Songpo. Difference of Soil Thickness among Micro-Topographies and Their Thresholds for Vegetation Growth in Gneiss Area of Taihang Mountains [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(10): 156-163. |
[11] | Du Ying, Bao Yongxin, Lü Rubing, Qiu Ziyan, Song Chao, Song Xinzhang. Effects of Simulated Nitrogen Deposition on Non-Structural Carbohydrates of Moso Bamboo [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(7): 10-17. |
[12] | Li Chong, Zhou Guomo, Shi Yongjun, Zhou Yufeng, Xu Lin, Fan Yeqing, Shen Zhenming, Li Shaohong, Lü Yulong. Effects of Different Management Measures on the Net Carbon Sequestration Capacity of Moso bamboo Forest Ecosystem [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(2): 1-9. |
[13] | Gao Guolong, Du Huaqiang, Han Ning, Xu Xiaojun, Sun Shaobo, Li Xuejian. Mapping of Moso Bamboo Forest Using Object-Based Approach Based on the Optimal Features [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(9): 77-85. |
[14] | Chen Hong, Tian Genlin, Fei Benhua. Arrangement of Cellulose Microfibrils in Primary Cell Wall of Moso Bamboo Fiber Studied with AFM [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(4): 90-94. |
[15] | Li Zhiqiang, Fei Benhua, Jiang Zehui. Effect of Inorganic Salts on Enzymatic Saccharification of Moso Bamboo Pretreated by Microwave-Dilute Acid [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(4): 101-107. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||