国有林区天然林资源保护工程绩效评价——以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210416

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: The key state-owned forest region in Heilongjiang Province was taken as an example for a relatively objective tracking evaluation of the performance of natural forest protection project, in order to provide a basis for the performance evaluation of natural forest protection projects in China. Method: A performance evaluation indicators system consisting of three subsystems of resources, industries and society was developed to evaluate the performance of natural forest protection project in the key state-owned forest region of Heilongjiang Province from 2000 to 2018 by using TOPSIS model based on entropy weight. Result: From 2000 to 2018, the performance values of the three subsystems of resources, industries and society, and the whole natural forest project system were respectively in the range of 0.019 0-0.748 0, 0.182 7-0.776 4, 0.010 0-0.782 2 and 0.018 8-0.753 2, showing a upward fluctuating trend on the whole. Conclusion: The entropy weight of the performance evaluation indicators system for the natural forest protection project based on the case study objectively reflects the main objectives of the natural forest protection project which focuses on natural forest protection and ecological environment construction, benefiting people's livelihood, promoting social harmonious development, and helping the industrial economic transformation and development of state-owned forest region. Compared with the "Phase Ⅰ Natural Forest Protection Project", the performance values of the three subsystems and the whole project system of the "Phase Ⅱ Natural Forest Protection Project" had been greatly improved, and their performance levels had all been transformed from "little changed" to "slightly improved" and then to "becoming better". By the end of 2018, all performance levels had reached "becoming better", but there was still one more level to reach the best performance level of "becoming very good".

Key words: state-owned forest region, natural forest protection project, performance evaluation, entropy weight TOPSIS model

CLC Number:

F307.2

Chaohong Li,Wei Wei,Shuxin Liu. Performance Evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project in State-Owned Forest Region——A Case Study of Key State-Owned Forest Region in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 153-162.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

The performance evaluation index system of the natural forest protection project and changes of indexes before and after the implementation of natural forest protection project in the key state-owned forest region of Heilongjiang Province"

系统层及权重 System layer and weight	控制层及权重 Control layer and weight	指标层及权重 Index layer and weight	总体趋势 The overall trend
系统层及权重 System layer and weight	控制层及权重 Control layer and weight	指标层及权重 Index layer and weight	“天保工程”前 Before the natural forest protection project	“天保工程”后 After the natural forest protection project
资源子系统 Resource subsystem0.439 0	资源存量 Resource stock0.741 4	林地面积 Woodland area/10⁴hm² 0.328 6	下降 Down	上升 Up
		森林面积 Forest area/10⁴hm² 0.318 5	下降 Down	上升 Up
		森林蓄积量 Forest volume/10⁸ m³ 0.352 9	下降 Down	上升 Up
	资源保护强度 Resource protection intensity0.258 6	森林覆盖率Forest coverage(%) 0.329 4	下降 Down	上升 Up
		自然保护区面积占比Proportion of nature reserve area(%) 0.332 6	下降 Down	上升 Up
		森林公园总面积占比Proportion of total area of Forest Park(%) 0.338 0	下降 Down	上升 Up
产业子系统 Industrial subsystem0.265 2	产业产出能力 Industrial output capacity0.156 6	林业产业总产值Gross output value of forestry industry/10⁴ yuan 0.147 9	下降 Down	上升 Up
		第一产业涉林产业总产值Gross output value of forestry industry involved in primary industry/10⁴yuan 0.088 0	下降 Down	上升 Up
		人造板制造产业总产值Gross output value of wood-based panel manufacturing industry/10⁴yuan 0.068 6	下降 Down	先上升后下降 First up and then Down
		森林旅游与休闲服务产业总产值Gross output value of forestry tourism and leisure service industry/10⁴yuan 0.245 8	下降 Down	上升 Up
		工程区木材产量Timber output in the project area/m³ 0.083 8	下降 Down	下降 Down
		木材销售量Timber sales/m³ 0.123 2	下降 Down	下降 Down
		人工林木材产量Timber yield of plantation/m³ 0.142 7	下降 Down	下降 Down
		食用菌产品产量Output of edible fungi products/t 0.100 0	下降 Down	上升 Up
	产业结构 Industrial structure0.161 2	林业第一产业总产值占林业产业总产值的比重 Proportion of gross output value of forestry primary industry in gross output value of forestry(%) 0.034 4	下降 Down	先上升后下降 First up and then Down
		林业第二产业总产值占林业产业总产值的比重Proportion of gross output value of forestry secondary industry in gross output value of forestry(%) 0.072 4	下降 Down	下降 Down
		林业第三产业总产值占林业产业总产值的比重Proportion of gross output value of forestry tertiary industry in gross output value of forestry(%) 0.092 4	下降 Down	上升 Up
		产业结构层次系数Hierarchy coefficient of industrial structure 0.002 3	下降 Down	上升 Up
		泰尔指数Theil index (%) 0.798 5	上升 Up	先上升后下降 First up and then Down
	产业投资 Industrial investment0.682 2	年内完成林业产业发展投资总额Total investment completed in forestry industry development within the year/10⁴yuan 0.807 8	下降 Down	上升 Up
	产业投资 Industrial investment0.682 2	年内完成林业支撑与保障投资总额Total investment completed in forestry support and guarantee within the year/10⁴yuan 0.192 2	下降 Down	持平Flat
社会子系统 Social subsystem0.295 8	职工社会福利保障 Social welfare security for employees0.788 0	年末参加基本养老保险总人数占比Proportion of total number of people participating in basic endowment insurance at the end of the year (%) 0.045 3	下降 Down	上升 Up
		年末参加基本医疗保险总人数占比Proportion of total number of people participating in basic medical insurance at the end of the year(%) 0.013 3	下降 Down	上升 Up
		在岗职工年平均工资Average annual wage of on-the-job staff/10⁴yuan 0.458 4	下降 Down	上升 Up
		当年离退休人员生活费Living expenses of retirees in that year/10⁴yuan 0.483 0	下降 Down	上升 Up
	民生及治安 People’s livelihood and public security0.212 0	林区职工上访率Petition rate of forest workers(%) 0.235 0	上升 Up	下降 Down
		林区消费投诉率Consumption complaint rate of forest area (%) 0.178 1	上升 Up	下降 Down
		林区对民主法治满意度Forest area’s satisfaction with democracy and rule of law(%) 0.094 1	下降 Down	上升 Up
		刑事案件发生率Incidence of criminal cases(%)0.054 6	上升 Up	下降 Down
		刑事案件破案率Detection rate of criminal cases(%)0.059 8	下降 Down	上升 Up
		家庭暴力投诉反映率Complaint response rate of domestic violence(%) 0.378 4	上升 Up	下降 Down

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Fig.2

References 0

	黄龙生, 王兵, 牛香, 等. 东北和内蒙古重点国有林区天然林保护工程生态效益分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2017, 15 (1): 89- 96.
	Huang L S , Wang B , Niu X , et al. Evaluation of ecological effects of the natural forest protection program in key state-owned forest districts in Northeast China and Inner Mongolia. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 15 (1): 89- 96.
	戢小辉, 张磊, 金键, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS的轨道交通线网分级测度. 都市快轨交通, 2015, 28 (4): 70- 74, 79.
	Ji X H , Zhang L , Jin J , et al. Grading evaluation model of urban rail transit network based on entropy TOPSIS. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2015, 28 (4): 70- 74, 79.
	李朝洪, 孙丹, 王志伟. 大小兴安岭国有林区产业转型绩效的驱动与障碍因素诊断. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48 (5): 133- 138.
	Li C H , Sun D , Wang Z W . Driving and obstacle factors for industrial transition performance of state-owned forest areas in Daxing'an and Xiaoxing'an Mountains. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2020, 48 (5): 133- 138.
	李朝洪, 赵晓红. 黑龙江省森工国有林区生态建设与经济转型协调发展研究. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019a, 43 (2): 144- 152.
	Li C H , Zhao X H . Study on the coordinated development of ecological construction and economic transformation in state-owned forest region of forest industry in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2019a, 43 (2): 144- 152.
	李朝洪, 赵晓红. 我国东北重点国有林区森林生态经济绩效评价及障碍因子诊断. 世界林业研究, 2019b, 32 (1): 102- 106.
	Li C H , Zhao X H . Forest eco-economic performance evaluation and obstacle factors diagnosis for key state-owned forest areas in northeast China. World Forestry Research, 2019b, 32 (1): 102- 106.
	刘璨, 孟庆华, 李育明, 等. 我国天然林保护工程对区域经济与生态效益的影响——以四川省峨边县和盐边县为例. 生态学报, 2005, (3): 428- 434. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.03.007
	Liu C , Meng Q H , Li Y M , et al. A case study on ecological and socioeconomic benefit evaluation of Sichuan Provincial Natural Forest Protective Project. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, (3): 428- 434.
	毛斌, 徐程扬, 李乐, 等. 人工油松风景林的林木分级技术. 林业科学, 2014, 50 (10): 49- 58.
	Mao B , Xu C Y , Li L , et al. Tree classification for Pinus tabulaeformis scenic plantation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50 (10): 49- 58.
	陶蕴之, 吕一河, 李凤全, 等. 西南天然林保护工程区生态成效评估. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32 (5): 716- 723.
	Tao Y Z , Lü Y H , Li F Q , et al. Assessment of ecological effect of the natural forest protection project in southwest China. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32 (5): 716- 723.
	王谦. 基于平衡计分卡的天然林资源保护工程绩效评价指标体系研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学硕士学位论文, 2011.
	Wang Q . Research on the performance evaluation index system of natural forest resources protection project based on BSC. Harbin: MS thesis of Northeast Forestry University, 2011.
	王玉芳, 朱震锋. 黑龙江省国有林区林业生产率变化研究——2000—2009年天然林资源保护工程期实证分析. 林业经济问题, 2013, 33 (1): 1- 7.
	Wang Y F , Zhu Z F . Study on forestry productivity changing in the state-owned forest region of Heilongjiang Province—An empirical analysis based on natural forest resources protection project (2000—2009). Issues of Forestry Economics, 2013, 33 (1): 1- 7.
	于波涛, 田刚. 基于运行效率评价的林业产业系统脆弱性分析与测度. 林业科学, 2004, (7): 111- 117.
	Yu B T , Tian G . Analysis and measuration on frangibility of forestry industrial system based on operational efficiency evaluation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, (7): 111- 117.
	余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30 (7): 1092- 1103.
	Yu L L , Cai Y Y . Performance evaluation and obstacle indicator diagnoses of economic compensation for farmland protection policy based on farmers' satisfaction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30 (7): 1092- 1103.
	朱震锋, 曹玉昆. 天保工程碳汇效果评价——以黑龙江森工林区为例. 林业经济问题, 2012, 32 (3): 249- 252, 282.
	Zhu Z F , Cao Y K . The evaluation of the carbon sink of natural forest protection project—Taking the example of the forest industry zone of Heilongjiang province. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2012, 32 (3): 249- 252, 282.
	Janic M . Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2003, 26 (6): 491- 512.

年份 Year	资源子系统 Resource subsystem		产业子系统 Industrial subsystem		社会子系统 Social subsystem		综合 Comprehensive
年份 Year	绩效 Performance	等级 Grade	绩效 Performance	等级 Grade	绩效 Performance	等级 Grade	绩效 Performance	等级 Grade
2000	0.019 0	SD	0.208 0	LC	0.010 0	SD	0.018 8	SD
2001	0.031 9	SD	0.208 6	LC	0.040 7	SD	0.030 3	SD
2002	0.074 2	SD	0.229 9	LC	0.073 0	SD	0.077 3	SD
2003	0.102 0	SD	0.206 7	LC	0.089 7	SD	0.099 4	SD
2004	0.159 6	SD	0.191 6	SD	0.108 7	SD	0.153 2	SD
2005	0.173 5	SD	0.182 7	SD	0.126 8	SD	0.169 5	SD
2006	0.174 3	SD	0.200 7	LC	0.142 6	SD	0.176 5	SD
2007	0.183 1	SD	0.227 5	LC	0.164 6	SD	0.194 7	SD
2008	0.188 5	SD	0.216 8	LC	0.195 3	SD	0.207 7	LC
2009	0.279 0	LC	0.211 2	LC	0.239 8	LC	0.293 6	LC
2010	0.324 2	LC	0.232 5	LC	0.295 1	LC	0.349 8	LC
2011	0.413 9	SI	0.536 7	SI	0.450 4	SI	0.559 4	SI
2012	0.440 9	SI	0.424 4	SI	0.467 9	SI	0.545 9	SI
2013	0.503 8	SI	0.541 7	SI	0.530 3	SI	0.654 4	BB
2014	0.535 0	SI	0.562 5	SI	0.619 5	BB	0.711 7	BB
2015	0.652 5	BB	0.706 6	BB	0.742 6	BB	0.728 8	BB
2016	0.710 7	BB	0.729 9	BB	0.757 0	BB	0.733 2	BB
2017	0.721 2	BB	0.753 2	BB	0.775 5	BB	0.741 8	BB
2018	0.748 0	BB	0.776 4	BB	0.782 2	BB	0.753 2	BB

[1]	Zhu Zhenfeng, Cao Yukun. Pseudo Decoupling Risk of Economic Growth and Resource Consumption Identifying and Cracking in the National Forestry Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(4): 139-149.
[2]	Qing Yan;Cai Zhiyong;Wu Yiqiang;Li Xianjun. Study Progress on Cellulose Nanofibril [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(7): 145-152.
[3]	Kong Fanbin;. Theorical and Empirical Research of Performance Evaluation for the Policy of Collective Forestry Property Rights System Reform [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(10): 132-141.
[4]	Wang Yongqing;Wan Zhifang. Discuss the System Arrangement of New Relation between Planting Forest and Cutting-Transport Production in State-Owned Forest Region [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(8): 74-81.
[5]	Geng Yude;Wan Zhifang. Study on the Countermeasure of Regulating and Optimizing Forest Industry Construction in State-Owned Forest Region of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(6): 86-93.
[6]	Wang Yongqing. STUDY ON ADJUSTMENT & REORGANIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN STATE-OWNED FOREST REGION [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39(4): 118-126.

Performance Evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project in State-Owned Forest Region——A Case Study of Key State-Owned Forest Region in Heilongjiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 0

Related Articles 6

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments