Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 62-71.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210207
Previous Articles Next Articles
Jinlong Li1,Mantang Wang1,2,Hanshi Li1,Xiaoping Chen1,Jun Sun1,Quanlin Zhong1,3,Dongliang Cheng1,3,*
Received:
2019-07-05
Online:
2021-02-25
Published:
2021-03-29
Contact:
Dongliang Cheng
CLC Number:
Jinlong Li,Mantang Wang,Hanshi Li,Xiaoping Chen,Jun Sun,Quanlin Zhong,Dongliang Cheng. Effects of Canopy Height on the Relationship Between Individual Leaf Mass and Leafing Intensity of 69 Broad Leaved Trees in Jiangxi Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(2): 62-71.
Table 1
Species name, life forms (evergreen and deciduous), number of trees per hectare, average DBH and average tree height of 69 broadleaved trees"
树种 Species | 功能型 Life forms | 株数 Number of trees/(tree·hm-2) | 平均胸径 Average DBH/cm | 平均树高 Average tree height/m |
栲树Castanopsis fargesii | E | 103.44 | 21.43±0.37 | 11.98±0.20 |
米槠Castanopsis carlesii | E | 41.08 | 20.80±0.44 | 12.75±0.19 |
木荷Schima superba | E | 38.64 | 8.59±0.42 | 7.03±0.24 |
日本杜英Elaeocarpus japonicus | E | 32.6 | 10.21±0.31 | 7.94±0.19 |
交让木Daphniphyllum macropodum | E | 28.84 | 6.64±0.19 | 6.23±0.17 |
罗浮柿Diospyros morrisiana | E | 20.6 | 4.90±0.19 | 5.71±0.19 |
甜槠Castanopsis eyrei | E | 19.32 | 12.82±0.69 | 9.01±0.45 |
山杜英Elaeocarpus sylvestris | E | 18.72 | 8.85±0.46 | 7.13±0.34 |
少叶黄杞Engelhardtia fenzlii | E | 17.2 | 5.13±0.71 | 4.86±0.09 |
石栎Lithocarpus glaber | E | 12.92 | 6.14±0.23 | 5.55±0.13 |
格药柃Eurya muricata | E | 7.84 | 5.01±0.23 | 4.72±0.10 |
樟树Cinnamomum camphora | E | 7.12 | 7.91±0.34 | 6.02±0.21 |
乳源木莲Manglietia yuyuanensis | E | 6.6 | 6.78±0.54 | 5.75±0.34 |
闽楠Phoebe bournei | E | 5.72 | 6.66±0.23 | 5.30±0.17 |
赤楠Syzygium buxifolium | E | 4.96 | 4.65±3.34 | 4.23±1.26 |
野黄桂Cinnamomum jensenianum | E | 4.36 | 5.81±0.37 | 5.43±0.28 |
冬青Ilex chinensis | E | 4.32 | 5.21±0.40 | 5.07±0.41 |
猴欢喜Sloanea sinensis | E | 4.28 | 8.16±0.50 | 6.81±0.32 |
杨梅Myrica rubra | E | 3.72 | 8.99±5.40 | 6.07±2.10 |
黄瑞木Adinandra millettii | E | 3.36 | 4.45±0.23 | 4.25±0.14 |
亮叶腊梅Chimonanthus praecox | E | 3.08 | 3.48±0.70 | 4.38±0.24 |
树参Dendropanax dentiger | E | 1.88 | 3.66±0.21 | 3.52±0.14 |
老鼠矢Symplocos stellaris | E | 1.6 | 3.91±0.21 | 3.95±0.19 |
长圆叶鼠刺Itea chinensis | E | 1.6 | 7.91±0.34 | 6.02±0.21 |
苦槠Castanopsis sclerophylla | E | 1.44 | 20.30±1.17 | 12.39±0.79 |
杜鹃Rhododendron simsii | E | 0.72 | 3.86±0.26 | 3.41±0.17 |
野含笑Michelia skinneriana | E | 0.44 | 7.87±0.66 | 5.85±0.36 |
细齿蕈树Altingiagracilipes | E | 0.36 | 16.08±3.66 | 10.57±2.26 |
厚叶冬青Ilex elmerrilliana | E | 0.36 | 5.11±0.55 | 4.27±0.36 |
红润楠Machilus thunbergii | E | 0.32 | 12.00±2.5 | 7.98±1.54 |
厚皮香Ternstroemia gymnanthera | E | 0.24 | 5.12±1.18 | 4.40±0.91 |
钩栲Castanopsis tibetana | E | 0.20 | 12.32±2.55 | 8.48±1.84 |
马银花Rhododendron ovatum | E | 0.20 | 3.47±0.24 | 3.73±0.27 |
山腊梅Chimonanthus nitens | E | 0.16 | 3.59±0.09 | 3.80±0.16 |
茜树Randiacochin chinensis | E | 0.16 | 9.48±5.56 | 3.35±0.25 |
绒毛润楠Machilus velutina | E | 0.16 | 2.85±0.05 | 3.40±0.50 |
红茴香Illicium henryi | E | 0.12 | 14.73±5.26 | 6.13±1.56 |
华东润楠Machilus leptophylla | E | 0.12 | 24.50±2.32 | 16.97±0.33 |
檵木Loropetalumchinense | E | 0.12 | 13.10±4.40 | 7.90±0.30 |
山矾Symplocos sumuntia | E | 0.12 | 3.15±0.35 | 5.35±0.15 |
武夷四照花Dendrobenthamia angustata | E | 0.12 | 3.50±0.10 | 3.60±0.20 |
油茶Camellia oleifera | E | 0.12 | 2.23±0.09 | 3.87±0.68 |
竹叶楠Phoebe faberi | E | 0.04 | 4.5 | 2.8 |
拟赤杨Alniphyllum fortunei | D | 75.04 | 12.55±0.20 | 10.22±0.12 |
山苍子Litsea cubeba | D | 58.44 | 6.75±0.21 | 6.91±0.20 |
枫香Liquidambar formosana | D | 16.96 | 14.62±0.83 | 10.76±0.61 |
南酸枣Choerospondias axillaris | D | 7.44 | 10.62±0.77 | 8.14±0.19 |
野柿Diospyros kaki | D | 7.04 | 10.97±0.66 | 8.79±0.38 |
野漆树Toxicodendron succedaneum | D | 6.24 | 7.64±0.36 | 7.43±0.33 |
蓝果树Nyssa sinensis | D | 5.76 | 10.09±0.62 | 8.99±0.42 |
白玉兰Magnolia denudata | D | 2.44 | 7.79±0.69 | 6.81±0.35 |
楤木Aralia chinensis | D | 1.96 | 6.69±0.34 | 6.00±0.31 |
山合欢Albizia kalkora | D | 1.72 | 5.81±0.90 | 5.20±0.44 |
加杨Populus canadensis | D | 1.32 | 6.55±0.34 | 6.48±0.26 |
光皮桦Betula luminifera | D | 0.92 | 8.36±0.92 | 8.02±0.42 |
迎春樱Cerasus discoidea | D | 0.92 | 6.13±0.68 | 6.11±0.24 |
化香Platycarya strobilacea | D | 0.8 | 15.13±2.36 | 13.27±1.55 |
盐肤木Rhus chinensis | D | 0.68 | 6.09±0.47 | 5.94±0.38 |
苦楝Melia azedarach | D | 0.60 | 13.77±1.68 | 8.60±0.99 |
意杨Populus xiaozhuanica | D | 0.56 | 5.81±1.61 | 4.51±0.59 |
板栗Castanea mollissima | D | 0.44 | 8.35±0.58 | 6.69±0.40 |
水青冈Fagus longipetiolata | D | 0.32 | 15.31±6.80 | 9.64±7.37 |
朴树Celtis sinensis | D | 0.20 | 9.24±3.60 | 8.68±1.92 |
大果安息香Styrax macrocarpus | D | 0.16 | 4.50±0.67 | 4.95±0.51 |
短柄枹栎Quercus serrata | D | 0.12 | 3.80±1.20 | 2.95±1.65 |
梅子Photinia davidsoniae | D | 0.12 | 7.40±4.45 | 5.13±1.58 |
野桐Mallotus japonicus | D | 0.12 | 3.60±0.44 | 5.73±0.35 |
野鸦椿Euscaphis japonica | D | 0.04 | 3.20 | 4.20 |
黄檀Dalbergia hupeana | D | 0.04 | 37.7 | 18.2 |
Table 2
The standardized major axis estimation of individual leaf mass and leafing intensity among different canopy heights andleaf forms (evergreen and deciduous)"
指标 Index(y - x) | 类型 Type | 树种数量 Tree number | 斜率 Slope | 95%置信区间 95% CI | 截距 Intercept | 决定系数 R2 | P |
ILM-Lim | 常绿上冠层Evergreen upper canopy | 43 | -0.91 | -1.13,-0.74 | 1.24 | 0.54 | < 0.001 |
落叶上冠层Deciduous upper canopy | 26 | -1.01 | -1.28,-0.80 | 1.01 | 0.68 | < 0.001 | |
上冠层Upper canopy | 69 | -0.95 | -1.11,-0.81 | 1.16 | 0.58 | < 0.001 | |
常绿下冠层Evergreen lower canopy | 43 | -0.92 | -1.11,-0.76 | 1.05 | 0.62 | < 0.001 | |
落叶下冠层Deciduous lower canopy | 26 | -1.09 | -1.42,-0.84 | 0.91 | 0.60 | < 0.001 | |
下冠层Lower canopy | 69 | -0.97 | -1.13,-0.84 | 1.00 | 0.61 | < 0.001 | |
ILM-Liv | 常绿上冠层Evergreen upper canopy | 43 | -0.94 | -1.10,-0.81 | 0.83 | 0.75 | < 0.001 |
落叶上冠层Deciduous upper canopy | 26 | -0.85 | -1.03,-0.70 | 1.02 | 0.80 | < 0.001 | |
上冠层Upper canopy | 69 | -0.89 | -1.00,-0.79 | 0.93 | 0.77 | < 0.001 | |
常绿下冠层Evergreen lower canopy | 43 | -0.87 | -1.01,-0.75 | 0.99 | 0.77 | < 0.001 | |
落叶下冠层Deciduous lower canopy | 26 | -0.90 | -1.14,-0.71 | 0.89 | 0.68 | < 0.001 | |
下冠层Lower canopy | 69 | -0.89 | -1.00,-0.78 | 0.94 | 0.73 | < 0.001 |
郭茹, 温仲明, 王红霞, 等. 延河流域植物也形状间关系及其在不同植被带的表达. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26 (12): 3627- 3633. | |
Guo R , Wen Z M , Wang H X , et al. Relationships among leaf traits and their expression in different vegetation zones in Yanhe River Basin, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26 (12): 3627- 3633. | |
孔令建, 游济顺, 俞社保, 等. 阳际峰自然保护区大样地群落结构特征. 南方林业科学, 2016, 44 (4): 5- 8. | |
Kong L J , You J Y , Yu S B , et al. Community structure characteristics of a large plot in Yangjifeng Nature Reserve of Jiangxi Province. South China Forestry Science, 2016, 44 (4): 5- 8. | |
刘长柱, 郭强, 池秀莲. 我国温带山地森林48中常见树种叶片重量-出叶强度的关系. 植物学报, 2015, 50 (2): 234- 240. | |
Liu C Z , Guo Q , Chi X L . Relationship between leaf mass and leafing intensity for 48 tree species in the temperate mountain forests in china. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2015, 50 (2): 234- 240. | |
任海, 彭少麟, 张祝平, 等. 鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林林冠结构与冠层辐射研究. 生态学报, 1996, 16 (2): 174- 179. | |
Ren H , Peng S L , Zhang Z P , et al. Study on canopy structure and canopy radiation of monsoon evergreen broad leaf forest in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve, Guangdong. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1996, 16 (2): 174- 179. | |
孙俊, 王满堂, 程林, 等. 不同海拔典型竹种枝叶大小异速生长关系. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30 (1): 165- 172. | |
Sun J , Wang M T , Cheng L , et al. Allometric relationship between twig size and leaf size of typical bamboo species along different altitudinal gradients. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30 (1): 165- 172. | |
孙蒙柯, 程林, 王满堂, 等. 武夷山常绿阔叶林木本植物小枝生物量分配. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37 (6): 1815- 1823. | |
Sun M K , Cheng L , Wang M T , et al. Twig biomass allocation of woody species in evergreen broad-leaf forest, Wuyi Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37 (6): 1815- 1823. | |
史元春, 赵成章, 宋清华, 等. 兰州北山刺槐枝叶性状的坡向差异性. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39 (4): 362- 370. | |
Shi Y C , Zhao C Z , Song Q H , et al. Slope-related variations in twig and leaf traits of Robinia pseudoacacia in the northern mountains of Lanzhou. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39 (4): 362- 370. | |
吴璐璐, 季梦成, 严雄梁. 阳际峰自然保护区地面生苔藓植物分布与环境因子关系研究. 武汉植物学研究, 2010, 28 (3): 324- 329. | |
Wu L L , Ji M C , Yan X L . Study on the relationships between terrestrial bryophytes and environmental factors in Yangjifeng Nature Reserve, China. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2010, 28 (3): 324- 329. | |
杨冬梅, 占峰, 张宏伟. 清凉峰不同海拔木本植物小枝内叶大小-数量权衡关系. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36 (4): 281- 291. | |
Yang D M , Zhan F , Zhang H W . Trade-off between leaf size and number in current-year twigs of deciduous broad-leaved woody species at different altitudes on Qingliang Mountain, Southeastern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36 (4): 281- 291. | |
Aarssen L W . Why don't bigger plants have proportionately bigger seeds?. Oikos, 2005, 111 (1): 199- 207.
doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.14206.x |
|
Aarssen L W , Schamp B S , Pither J . Why are there so many small plants? Implications for species coexistence. Journal of Ecology, 2006, 94 (3): 569- 580.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01128.x |
|
Ackerly D D , Knight C A , Weiss S B , et al. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia, 2002, 130 (3): 449- 457.
doi: 10.1007/s004420100805 |
|
Bonsall M B , Jansen V A A , Hassell P M . Life history trade-offs assemble ecological guilds. Science, 2004, 306 (5693): 111- 114.
doi: 10.1126/science.1100680 |
|
Bragg J G , Westoby M . Leaf size and foraging for light in a sclerophyll woodland. Functional Ecology, 2002, 16 (5): 633- 639.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00661.x |
|
Brown V K , Lawton J H . Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1991, 333 (1267): 265- 272.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0076 |
|
Corner E J H . The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Annals of Botany, 1949, 13 (52): 367- 414. | |
Dudley S A . Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution, 1996, 50 (1): 92- 102.
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04475.x |
|
Dombroskie S L , Aarssen L W . The leaf size/number trade-off within species and within plants for woody angiosperms. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 2012, 145 (1): 38- 45.
doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2012.665 |
|
Harvey P H , Pagel M D . The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford university press, 1991. | |
Huang Y X , Lechowicz M J , Price C A , et al. The underlying basis for the trade-off between leaf size and leafing intensity. Functional Ecology, 2015, 30 (2): 199- 205. | |
Klemian D , Aarssen L W . The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95 (2): 376- 382.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01205.x |
|
Liu Z , Cai Y , Li K , et al. The leaf size-twig size spectrum in evergreen broadleaved forest of subtropical china. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 9 (23): 3382- 3388. | |
Li T , Deng J M , Wang G X , et al. Isometric scaling relationship between leaf number and size within current-year shoots of woody species across contrasting habitats. Polish Journal of Ecology, 2009, 57 (4): 659- 667. | |
Milla R . The leafing intensity premium hypothesis tested across clades, growth forms and altitudes. Journal of Ecology, 2009, 97 (5): 972- 983.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01524.x |
|
Niklas K J . Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 1993, 154 (2): 364- 366.
doi: 10.1086/297117 |
|
Niklas K J . A mechanical perspective on foliage leaf form and function. The New Phytologist, 1999, 143 (1): 19- 31.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00441.x |
|
Niinemets V , Anten N P R . Packing the photosynthetic machinery: from leaf to canopy. Photosynthesis in Silico, 2009, 29, 363- 399. | |
Parkhurst D F , Loucks O L . Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. Journal of Ecology, 1972, 60 (2): 505- 537.
doi: 10.2307/2258359 |
|
Pitman E J G . A note on normal correlation. Biometrika, 1939, 31 (1/2): 9- 12.
doi: 10.2307/2334971 |
|
Ryan M G , Yoder B J . Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth. Bioscience, 1997, 47 (4): 235- 242.
doi: 10.2307/1313077 |
|
Sack L , Melcher P J , Liu W H , et al. How strong is intracanopy leaf plasticity in temperate deciduous trees?. American Journal of Botany, 2006, 93 (6): 829- 839.
doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.6.829 |
|
Sultan S E . Plant developmental responses to the environment: eco-devo insights. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010, 13 (1): 96- 101.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.021 |
|
Sun S C , Jin D , Shi P . The leaf size-twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient: an invariant allometric scaling relationship. Annals of Botany, 2006, 97 (1): 97- 107.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj004 |
|
Scoffoni C , Rawls M , Mckown A , et al. Decline of leaf hydraulic conductance with dehydration: relationship to leaf size and venation architecture. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156 (2): 832- 843.
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.173856 |
|
Valladares F . Light heterogeneity and plants: from ecophysiology to species coexistence and biodiversity. Progress in Botany, 2003, 64, 439- 471. | |
Warton D I , Weber N C . Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometrical Journal, 2002, 44 (2): 161- 174.
doi: 10.1002/1521-4036(200203)44:2<161::AID-BIMJ161>3.0.CO;2-N |
|
Warton D I , Wright I J , Falster D S , et al. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews, 2006, 81 (2): 259- 291.
doi: 10.1017/S1464793106007007 |
|
Warton D I , Duursma R A , Falster D S , et al. Smart 3-an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012, 3 (2): 257- 259.
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00153.x |
|
Westoby M , Wright I J . The leaf size-twig size spectrum and its relationship to other important spectra of variation among species. Oecologia, 2003, 135, 621- 628.
doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1231-6 |
|
Westoby M , Falster D S , Moles A T , et al. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2002, 33, 125- 159.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 |
|
Wright I J , Westoby M , Reich P B . Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90 (3): 534- 543.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00689.x |
|
Xiang S , Wu N , Sun S . Testing the generality of the 'leafing intensity premium' hypothesis in temperate broad-leaved forests: a survey of variation in leaf size within and between habitats. Evolutionary Ecology, 2010, 24 (4): 685- 701.
doi: 10.1007/s10682-009-9325-1 |
|
Yan E R , Milla R , Aarssen L W , et al. Functional relationships of leafing intensity to plant height, growth form and leaf habit. Acta Oecologica, 2012, 41, 20- 29.
doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2012.04.001 |
|
Yang X D , Yan E R , Chang S X , et al. Twig-leaf size relationships in woody plants vary intraspecifically along a soil moisture gradient. Acta Oecologica, 2014, 60, 17- 25.
doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2014.07.004 |
|
Yang D M , Li G Y , Sun S C . The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. Annals of Botany, 2008, 102 (4): 623- 629.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn135 |
[1] | Duan Zhugeng, Xiao Huashun, Yuan Weixiang. Comparison of Interpolation Methods of Forest Canopy Height Model Using Discrete Point Cloud Data [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(9): 86-94. |
[2] | Qiu Sai, Xing Yanqiu, Tian Jing, Ding Jianhua. Forest Canopy Height Estimation of Large Area Using Spaceborne LIDAR and HJ-1A/HSI Hyperspectral Imageries [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 142-149. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||