森林色彩景观格局指数与色彩属性指标对观赏效应的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210202

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the quantitative relationship between forest color landscape pattern indices (referred to as color pattern index), color attribute indicators and scenic beauty estimation (SBE); to establish an ornamental effect evaluation model; to screen for key indicators affecting SBE; to provide guidance for forest color landscape pattern allocation. Method: Typical mountain forest landscapes in the Yangtze River Delta region were studied, PS, Color Impact, CAD, ArcGIS, and Fragstics software tools were employed to divide color patches; calculate color pattern indices; obtain SBE via psychophysical method; generate statistics; analyze correlations between color pattern indices, color attribute indicators and SBE; establish an ornamental effect evaluation model and screen for key indicators affecting SBE. Result: The Pearson correlation analysis showed that the maximum patch relative area (r=-0.311, P < 0.05), forest color distribution model (r=-0.690, P < 0.01), and contagion index (r=-0.398, P < 0.01) were significantly (P < 0.05) or highly significantly negatively (P < 0.01) correlated with color SBE. Average patch fractional dimension (r=0.322, P < 0.05), Shannon's diversity index (r=0.352, P < 0.05), landscape abundance (r=0.655, P < 0.05), and panchromatic brightness (r=0.482, P < 0.01) were significantly and highly significantly positively correlated with color SBE. The landscape level index was more correlated with SBE than the patch level index, and the panchromatic attribute index was more correlated with SBE than the main and auxiliary color attribute indices. The correlation among the three indicators of panchromatic chromatic aberration, edge density and perimeter area ratio was highly significant (r>0.800, P < 0.01). There was a highly significant positive correlation between the relative area of the main color and contagion (r=0.862, P < 0.01), a highly significant negative correlation between the contagion and Shannon's Diversity Index (r=-0.862, P < 0.01), and a highly significant negative correlation between the relative area of the main color and Shannon's diversity index. The SBE evaluation model (R²=0.834 4) showed that forest color landscapes exhibited great ornamental effect if they tended to aggregate but did not completely connect, panchromatic relative area was large but main color relative area was small, color patches had natural curvilinear edges and perfect shape, colors were rich but displayed uneven spatial distribution, and color patches had natural and orderly mosaics with high ornamental effect. The effect of forest color distribution model indicators on SBE, which was proposed for the first time in this study, was highly significant (r=-0.690, P < 0.01), and the SBE of the color distribution model was high if the model featured favorable changes in color pattern, a high sense of order and strong naturalness. Conclusion: There are significant and highly significant correlations between SBE and color pattern index, it is feasible to apply the color pattern index for color ornamental effect evaluation using the established eveluation model.

Key words: forest color, color pattern, color quantification, color ornamental effects

CLC Number:

S731.7

Na Jia,Jiuxi Shi,Yixin Qin,Letu Geri,Long Zhang. Influence of Forest Color Landscape Pattern Indices and Color Attribute Indicators on Ornamental Effect[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(2): 12-21.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Table 2

Pearson correlation coefficients between color pattern index, color attribute indicator and SBE"

指标Indicator	Y	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈	X₉	X₁₀	X₁₁	X₁₂	X₁₃	X₁₄	X₁₅	X₁₆	X₁₇	X₁₈	X₁₉	X₂₀	X₂₁	X₂₂
X₁	0.263	1
X₂	-0.390^**	-0.368^*	1
X₃	0.451^**	0.358^*	-0.452^**	1
X₄	0.311^*	0.313^*	-0.751^**	0.414^**	1
X₅	-0.331^*	-0.032	0.663^**	-0.199	-0.467^**	1
X₆	0.655^**	0.149	-0.319^*	0.240	0.243	-0.297^*	1
X₇	-0.690^**	0.065	0.201	-0.396^**	-0.210	0.173	-0.482^**	1
X₈	0.193	0.048	-0.244	0.001	0.219	-0.362^*	0.335^*	-0.216	1
X₉	0.230	0.033	-0.242	0.014	0.242	-0.102	0.201	-0.238	0.209	1
X₁₀	-0.156	-0.132	0.219	-0.090	-0.100	0.328^*	-0.173	0.166	-0.135	-0.177	1
X₁₁	-0.249	0.207	0.045	-0.066	-0.055	0.125	-0.054	0.276	0.151	-0.189	0.514^**	1
X₁₂	0.322^*	0.095	-0.151	0.307^*	0.167	-0.030	-0.022	-0.158	-0.298^*	-0.094	0.007	-0.043	1
X₁₃	-0.166	0.037	-0.053	-0.091	-0.016	0.120	0.048	-0.099	0.000	0.818^**	-0.275	-0.306^*	-0.096	1
X₁₄	-0.398^**	-0.343^*	0.862^**	-0.418^**	-0.492^**	0.587^**	-0.423^**	0.295^*	-0.293	-0.321^*	0.265	0.001	-0.004	-0.123	1
X₁₅	0.263	0.309^*	-0.154	0.083	0.108	0.394^**	-0.138	0.188	-0.716^**	-0.034	0.209	0.044	0.216	0.115	-0.079	1
X₁₆	-0.250	0.244	0.191	0.076	-0.113	0.628^**	-0.330^*	0.205	-0.587^**	-0.011	0.239	0.131	0.283	0.160	0.236	0.642^**	1
X₁₇	0.287	0.017	-0.504^**	0.150	0.376^*	-0.918^**	0.310^*	-0.288	0.459^**	0.193	-0.392^**	-0.172	-0.132	-0.032	-0.545^**	-0.528^**	-0.678^**	1
X₁₈	0.235	-0.117	-0.422^**	0.014	0.333^*	-0.761^**	0.317^*	-0.145	0.446^**	0.038	-0.176	-0.107	-0.110	-0.169	-0.371^*	-0.411^**	-0.723^**	0.699^**	1
X₁₉	0.352^*	0.325^*	-0.866^**	0.379^*	0.736^**	-0.576^**	0.413^**	-0.341^*	0.358^*	0.381^**	-0.253	-0.056	-0.081	0.137	-0.862^**	0.089	-0.293	0.574^**	0.451^**	1
X₂₀	0.161	0.298^*	-0.158	0.082	0.107	0.383^**	-0.139	0.187	-0.722^**	-0.035	0.202	0.038	0.214	0.113	-0.085	0.999^**	0.630^**	-0.516^**	-0.407^**	0.095	1
X₂₁	0.482^**	0.222	-0.355^*	0.683^**	0.204	-0.160	0.273	-0.486^**	-0.031	-0.064	0.001	-0.104	0.174	-0.119	-0.444^**	0.118	0.001	0.189	-0.026	0.347^*	0.120	1
X₂₂	0.240	0.038	-0.230	0.057	0.217	-0.090	0.141	-0.213	0.119	0.967^**	-0.159	-0.187	0.096	0.814^**	-0.289	-0.003	0.071	0.140	-0.027	0.290	-0.005	-0.057	1

Table 2

Fig.3

Table 3

Table 4

References 0

	傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 等. 景观生态学原理及应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
	Fu B J , Chen L D , Ma K M , et al. Principles and applications of landscape ecology. Beijing: Science Press, 2002.
	刘丽莉. 评价指标选取方法研究. 河北建筑工业学院学报, 2004, 22 (1): 134- 137.
	Liu L L . The selective method of evaluation index. Journal of Hebei Institute of Building Technology, 2004, 22 (1): 134- 137.
	马冰倩, 徐程扬, 崔义. 八达岭秋季景观整体色彩组成对美景度的影响. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33 (6): 258- 264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.06.41
	Ma B Q , Xu C Y , Cui Y . Effects of color composition in badaling forests on autumn landscape quality. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33 (6): 258- 264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.06.41
	毛斌, 彭立群, 李乐, 等. 侧柏风景林美景度的林内色彩斑块非线性模型研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37 (7): 68- 75.
	Mao B , Peng L Q , Li L , et al. Non-linear scenic beauty model of scenic Platycladus orientalis plantations based on in-forest color patches. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37 (7): 68- 75.
	秦一心. 长三角地区生态景观林色彩量化与配置研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2016,
	Qin Y X . Yangtze River Delta region ecological landscape forest color quantization and configuration research. Hohhot: MS thesis of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2016,
	史久西, 邓劲松, 王小明, 等. 乡村景观格局热效应. 林业科学, 2009, 22 (6): 792- 800. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.06.008
	Shi J X , Deng J S , Wang X M , et al. Thermal effect and adjusting mechnism of rural landscape patterns. Science of Forestry, 2009, 22 (6): 792- 800. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.06.008
	宋力, 何兴元, 张洁. 沈阳城市公园植物景观美学质量测定方法研究-美景度评估法. 平均值法和成对比较法的比较. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37 (2): 200- 203.
	Song L , He X Y , Zhang J . Scenic beauty assessment of planting in Shenyang urban park. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2006, 37 (2): 200- 203.
	孙亚美. 北京地区常用秋色叶树种色彩量化与评价研究. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文, 2015,
	Sun Y M . Color quantification and evaluation research on fall-color tree sin Beijing. Beijing: MS thesis of Beijing Forestry University, 2015,
	王冬雪. 种源与环境因子对枫香叶色变化的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2017,
	Wang D X . Effects of provenance and different environmental factor on leaf change color of Liquidambar formosana. Hohhot: MS thesis of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2017,
	俞孔坚. 自然风景质量评价研究——BIB-LCJ审美评判测量法. 北京林业大学学报, 1988, 10 (2): 1- 7.
	Yu K J . Study on natural landscape quality evaluation——BIB-LCJ aesthetic evaluation measurement method. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1988, 10 (2): 1- 7.
	于杨, 姚程程, 张洁, 等. 吉林省两城市常见绿化植物单体色彩美景度评价. 北华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 18 (4): 521- 527.
	Yu Y , Yao C C , Zhang J , et al. Scenic beauty on the common green plants monomers of two cities in Jilin. Journal of Beihua University: Natural Science Edition, 2017, 18 (4): 521- 527.
	张继渝. 设计色彩: 第2版. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2005.
	Zhang J Y . Design color: 2nd edition. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2005.
	赵秋月, 刘健, 余坤勇, 等. 基于SBE法和植物组合色彩量化分析的公园植物配置研究. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33 (1): 245- 251.
	Zhao Q Y , Liu J , Yu K Y , et al. Park plant congfiguration based on SBE method and quantitative analysis color combination. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33 (1): 245- 251.
	郑瑶. 重庆市秋季常见园林植物色彩定量研究. 重庆: 西南大学硕士学位论文, 2014,
	Zheng Y . Quantitative research on autumn common plantcolour in Chongqing. Chongqing: MS thesis of Southwest University, 2014,
	郑宇, 张炜琪, 吴倩楠, 等. 陕西金丝大峡谷国家森林公园秋季景观林色彩量化研究. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31 (3): 275- 280. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.03.48
	Zheng Y , Zhang W Q , Wu Q N , et al. The color quantitzation of the fall scenic forest in Jinsi Canyon National Forest Park in Shaanxi Province. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2016, 31 (3): 275- 280. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.03.48
	Daniel T C , Boster R S . Measuring landscape esthetics the scenic beauty estimation method. Washington: USDA Forest Service Research Paper, 1976,
	Daniel T C , Vining J . Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. New York: Plenum Press, 1983.
	Grown M J . Reading the colours of plants at a finer scale. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 2014, 9 (1): 42- 47. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2014.898829
	Han Q , Shinohara K , Kakubari Y , et al. Photoprotective role of rhodoxanthin during cold acclimation in Cryptomeria japonica. Plant Cell & Environment, 2003, 26 (5): 715- 723.
	Karin F A . Natures colour palette: inherent colours of vegetation, stones and ground. Stockholm: Scandinavian Colour Institute, 1996,
	King A W , With K A . Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter. Ecological Modelling, 2002, 147 (1): 23- 39. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00400-8
	Schirpke U , Tasser E , Tappeine U . Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 111 (1): 1- 12.
	Tahvanainen L , Tyrvainen L , Ihalainen M , et al. Forest management and public perceptions: visual versus verbal information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 53 (1/4): 53- 70.

模式 Model	排序 Rank	说明 Description	量化 Quantization
波纹 Ripple	1	色彩斑块呈纵、横或斜向的自然波纹分布，形成一定肌理，秩序良好 Color patches exhibited longitudinal, horizontal or oblique natural ripple distribution, formed a certain texture, and were in good order	-1.281 6
聚散 Agglomeration	2	色斑有大块聚集，也有小块或点状分散，疏密有致，色彩边界自然，秩序性较好 The color patches gathered in large agglomerations but were also distributed in small pieces or dots, showing favorable density, natural color borders and good order	-0.524 4
集聚 Aggregation	3	色彩大块状集聚，边界曲折自然，疏密感较差，秩序性无 Color exhibited a large aggregation, with a natural zigzagging border, poor density and no order	0.000 0
点丛 Point cluster	4	绿色基底中色彩成份呈单株或数株丛状分布，主题突出，视点集中 The color components in the green substrate were distributed in single or multiple clusters, with prominent theme and concentrated viewpoint	0.524
分散 Dispersion	5	色彩斑块较小且大致相等，点状分布，间隔距离基本一致，似“满天星”，自然性与疏密感较差，秩序机械 Smaller and roughly equal color patches were distributed in a dotted pattern, at roughly equal interval distances and in an orderly fashion, similar to “Starry Sky”, with poor naturalness and density	1.281

指标 Indicator	符号 Sign	非标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficients	标准化系数 Standardized coefficients	t	P	偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient	指标容忍度值 Tolerance
常数Constant		11.561 4		2.844 9	0.007 4
全色相对面积Panchromatic relative area	X₁	0.005 1	0.216 4	2.364 7	0.023 7	0.371 2	0.690 3
主色相对面积Main color relative area	X₂	-0.014 8	-0.577 2	-3.614 9	0.000 9	-0.521 4	0.226 8
景观丰度Landscape abundance	X₆	0.189 3	0.350 0	3.658 9	0.000 8	0.526 0	0.632 0
边缘密度Edge density	X₉	0.000 1	0.425 4	2.638 7	0.012 3	0.407 3	0.222 5
周长面积比Perimeter area ratio	X₁₃	-0.000 004 3	-0.365 1	-2.475 8	0.018 3	-0.386 0	0.265 9
斑块结合度Patch cohesion index	X₁₆	-0.105 2	-0.285 5	-2.306 9	0.027 1	-0.363 3	0.377 5
香侬多样性指数Shannon’s diversity index	X₁₈	-1.105 8	-0.804 3	-4.289 8	0.000 1	-0.587 0	0.164 5
相似毗邻百分比Similar adjacency percentage	X₁₅	0.027 1	0.335 6	2.923 2	0.006 0	0.443 0	0.438 6
森林色彩分布模式Forest color distribution model	X₇	-0.486 2	-0.633 3	-6.759 4	0.000 0	-0.752 5	0.658 7

指标 Indicator	标准化系数 Standardized coefficients	标准化系数绝对值 Absolute value of standardized coefficients	贡献率 Contribution rate
全色相对面积Panchromatic relative area	0.216 4	0.216 4	5.42%
主色相对面积Main color relative area	-0.577 2	0.577 2	14.46%
景观丰度Landscape abundance	0.350 0	0.350 0	8.76%
小计Subtotal			28.64%
边缘密度Edge density	0.425 4	0.425 4	10.65%
周长面积比Perimeter area rate	-0.365 1	0.365 1	9.14%
斑块结合度Patch cohesion index	-0.285 5	0.285 5	7.15%
香侬多样性指数Shannon’s diversity index	-0.804 3	0.804 3	20.14%
相似毗邻百分比Similar adjacency percentage	0.335 6	0.335 6	8.41%
森林色彩分布模式Forest color distribution model	-0.633 3	0.633 3	15.86%
小计Subtotal			71.36%
合计Total		3.992 8	100%

Influence of Forest Color Landscape Pattern Indices and Color Attribute Indicators on Ornamental Effect

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 0

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments