林业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (2): 100-112.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220211
林庆芝1,朱祥元1,毛培利1,*,朱琳2,郭龙梅1,李泽秀1,曹帮华1,郝迎东3,谭海涛3,洪丕征4,卢小军5
收稿日期:
2020-11-02
出版日期:
2022-02-25
发布日期:
2022-04-26
通讯作者:
毛培利
基金资助:
Qingzhi Lin1,Xiangyuan Zhu1,Peili Mao1,*,Lin Zhu2,Longmei Guo1,Zexiu Li1,Banghua Cao1,Yingdong Hao3,Haitao Tan3,Pizheng Hong4,Xiaojun Lu5
Received:
2020-11-02
Online:
2022-02-25
Published:
2022-04-26
Contact:
Peili Mao
摘要:
目的: 研究盐和干旱胁迫下不同大小刺槐种子的萌发规律,提出合适种子大小与胁迫程度的选配建议,为刺槐优良苗木的培育提供参考。方法: 利用土壤筛,将种子分为大粒、中粒和小粒3个等级,明确每个等级种子大小特征、千粒质量和吸胀率。用NaCl和PEG 6000模拟盐和干旱胁迫,配制不同渗透势(0、-0.05、-0.15、-0.30、-0.49 MPa)的NaCl、PEG溶液。将不同大小的种子放置在光照培养箱内进行萌发试验,分析种子的萌发特征、幼苗生物量和根系发育,并比较不同大小种子在萌发中的可塑性。结果: 1) 大粒和中粒种子的吸胀率显著大于小粒种子,中粒与小粒种子的千粒质量对比大粒种子分别降低22.01%、61.72%。2)随胁迫程度的增加,发芽率、发芽指数、活力指数显著降低,平均发芽时间显著增加;幼苗含水量、生物量、根长、根表面积、比根长、比根表面积显著降低。盐胁迫处理比干旱胁迫有着高的发芽率、发芽指数、活力指数、幼苗含水量,但在根干重、根冠比、根长、根表面积、比根长、比根表面积上低于干旱胁迫的。在各个指标的胁迫指数上,盐胁迫高于干旱胁迫的。3)在整个萌发过程中,大粒和中粒种子与小粒种子相比,发芽率、发芽指数、活力指数和幼苗生物量均较高,但在幼苗含水量、根系发育较小粒种子低。种子大小与盐和干旱胁迫有着显著的交互作用,逆境下大粒和中粒种子比小粒种子萌发能力强和幼苗生物量高,但随胁迫程度的增加大粒种子的优势逐渐降低。4)大粒与中粒种子的累计可塑性指数在盐和干旱胁迫下均大于小粒种子,盐胁迫处理的可塑性低于干旱胁迫的。结论: 盐和干旱胁迫显著抑制了刺槐种子萌发、幼苗生长和根系发育,其中干旱胁迫的抑制作用更明显。大粒与中粒种子在萌发和幼苗生长上有着明显优势,但受到胁迫方式和胁迫程度的影响。因此,种子大小与逆境共同影响种子萌发和幼苗生长过程,干旱、盐碱地区播种育苗时建议选择大粒与中粒的刺槐种子为宜。
中图分类号:
林庆芝,朱祥元,毛培利,朱琳,郭龙梅,李泽秀,曹帮华,郝迎东,谭海涛,洪丕征,卢小军. NaCl和PEG胁迫对不同大小刺槐种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2): 100-112.
Qingzhi Lin,Xiangyuan Zhu,Peili Mao,Lin Zhu,Longmei Guo,Zexiu Li,Banghua Cao,Yingdong Hao,Haitao Tan,Pizheng Hong,Xiaojun Lu. Effects of NaCl and PEG Stresses on Germination and Seedling Growth of Robinia pseudoacacia Seeds with Different Sizes[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 100-112.
表2
盐、干旱胁迫对不同大小的刺槐种子萌发、幼苗生物量和根系特征指标的三因素方差分析①"
指标 Indexes | 胁迫方式(A) Methods of coercion | 种子大小(B) Seed size | 渗透势(C) Osmotic potential | A×B | A×C | B×C | A×B×C | |||||||||||||
F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |||||||
GR | 30.10 | <0.01 | 28.77 | <0.01 | 115.25 | <0.01 | 27.79 | <0.01 | 5.25 | <0.01 | 2.46 | <0.05 | 2.52 | <0.05 | ||||||
GI | 12.25 | <0.01 | 25.93 | <0.01 | 184.21 | <0.01 | 14.32 | <0.01 | 5.05 | <0.01 | 2.71 | <0.05 | 3.16 | <0.01 | ||||||
MGT | 20.86 | <0.01 | 1.96 | 0.15 | 36.03 | <0.01 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 2.10 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.95 | 2.71 | <0.05 | ||||||
Ⅵ | 0.02 | 0.98 | 119.69 | <0.01 | 42.86 | <0.01 | 4.29 | <0.05 | 18.10 | <0.01 | 4.49 | <0.01 | 4.96 | <0.01 | ||||||
ABS | 0.04 | 0.83 | 140.68 | <0.01 | 3.38 | <0.05 | 0.49 | 0.81 | 11.37 | <0.01 | 2.25 | <0.05 | 2.88 | <0.01 | ||||||
RDW | 54.89 | <0.01 | 22.96 | <0.01 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.09 | 0.98 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 1.46 | 0.18 | ||||||
AWS | 117.01 | <0.01 | 7.53 | <0.01 | 5.68 | <0.01 | 1.04 | 0.35 | 3.45 | <0.05 | 3.95 | <0.01 | 3.54 | <0.01 | ||||||
UWS | 289.85 | <0.01 | 10.00 | <0.01 | 1.67 | 0.16 | 6.63 | <0.01 | 1.39 | 0.24 | 3.94 | <0.01 | 2.86 | <0.01 | ||||||
RSR | 49.45 | <0.01 | 10.31 | <0.01 | 1.28 | 0.28 | 1.15 | 0.35 | 5.07 | <0.01 | 1.49 | 0.17 | 1.63 | 0.13 | ||||||
SB | 3.39 | <0.01 | 144.22 | <0.01 | 3.58 | <0.05 | 0.39 | 0.67 | 8.80 | <0.01 | 2.59 | <0.05 | 2.54 | <0.05 | ||||||
RL | 132.99 | <0.01 | 5.11 | <0.01 | 17.06 | <0.01 | 4.19 | <0.05 | 7.95 | <0.01 | 0.51 | 0.85 | 0.36 | 0.94 | ||||||
RSA | 423.45 | <0.01 | 5.16 | <0.01 | 16.70 | <0.01 | 5.61 | <0.01 | 6.58 | <0.01 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.75 | ||||||
SRL | 87.80 | <0.01 | 9.80 | <0.01 | 8.62 | <0.01 | 8.50 | <0.01 | 3.64 | <0.01 | 1.46 | 0.19 | 0.75 | 0.64 | ||||||
SRA | 163.70 | <0.01 | 10.25 | <0.01 | 5.60 | <0.01 | 10.83 | <0.01 | 2.00 | 0.09 | 2.02 | 0.05 | 1.25 | <0.05 |
表3
不同大小刺槐种子萌发的胁迫指数"
指标 Indexes | 渗透势 Osmotic potential/MPa | NaCl | PEG 6000 | |||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||
GR | -0.05 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.87 | |
-0.15 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.77 | ||
-0.30 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 0.75 | ||
-0.49 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.51 | ||
GI | -0.05 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.93 | |
-0.15 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.66 | ||
-0.30 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.59 | ||
-0.49 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.41 | ||
MGT | -0.05 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.00 | |
-0.15 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.03 | ||
-0.30 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 1.04 | ||
-0.49 | 1.04 | 1.07 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.04 | ||
Ⅵ | -0.05 | 0.86 | 1.21 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.55 | |
-0.15 | 1.38 | 1.33 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.40 | ||
-0.30 | 1.03 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.36 | ||
-0.49 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.26 |
表4
不同大小刺槐种子萌发的幼苗含水量的胁迫指数"
指标 Indexes | 渗透势 Osmotic potential/MPa | NaCl | PEG 6000 | |||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||
AWS | -0.05 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 0.86 | 1.06 | 0.99 | |
-0.15 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 1.04 | 0.91 | ||
-0.30 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 0.89 | ||
-0.49 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.76 | ||
UWS | -0.05 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.67 | 1.07 | 1.08 | |
-0.15 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 1.14 | ||
-0.30 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 1.02 | ||
-0.49 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.82 |
表5
不同大小刺槐种子萌发的幼苗生物量和根冠比的胁迫指数"
指标 Indexes | 渗透势 Osmotic potential/MPa | NaCl | PEG 6000 | |||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||
ABS | -0.05 | 1.18 | 1.43 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.88 | |
-0.15 | 1.82 | 2.02 | 1.10 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.88 | ||
-0.30 | 1.49 | 1.32 | 0.95 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.84 | ||
-0.49 | 1.16 | 1.21 | 0.90 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.78 | ||
RDW | -0.05 | 0.64 | 1.17 | 1.02 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.02 | |
-0.15 | 0.73 | 1.22 | 0.80 | 1.11 | 0.89 | 0.89 | ||
-0.30 | 0.58 | 1.27 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 1.01 | ||
-0.49 | 0.55 | 1.46 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.75 | ||
SB | -0.05 | 1.10 | 1.43 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.97 | |
-0.15 | 1.66 | 1.93 | 1.06 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.91 | ||
-0.30 | 1.36 | 1.31 | 0.96 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.87 | ||
-0.49 | 1.11 | 1.24 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.77 | ||
RSR | -0.05 | 0.64 | 0.95 | 1.14 | 1.36 | 1.26 | 1.07 | |
-0.15 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.79 | 1.63 | 1.29 | 1.17 | ||
-0.30 | 0.38 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.39 | 1.16 | 1.15 | ||
-0.49 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 1.19 | 1.12 | 0.97 |
表6
不同大小刺槐种子萌发的幼苗根系指标的胁迫指数"
指标 Indexes | 渗透势 Osmotic potential/MPa | NaCl | PEG 6000 | |||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||
RL | -0.05 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 0.60 | |
-0.15 | 0.42 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.28 | 0.59 | 0.39 | ||
-0.30 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.56 | ||
-0.49 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.22 | ||
RSA | -0.05 | 1.29 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 0.53 | |
-0.15 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.39 | ||
-0.30 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.61 | 0.35 | ||
-0.49 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.24 | ||
SRL | -0.05 | 1.20 | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.45 | 0.56 | |
-0.15 | 0.55 | 0.37 | 0.84 | 0.24 | 0.37 | 0.45 | ||
-0.30 | 0.84 | 0.37 | 0.84 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.55 | ||
-0.49 | 0.64 | 0.34 | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.29 | ||
SRA | -0.05 | 1.05 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.49 | |
-0.15 | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 0.24 | 0.59 | 0.46 | ||
-0.30 | 0.65 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.34 | ||
-0.49 | 0.49 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.61 | 0.32 |
表7
不同大小刺槐种子的可塑性指数"
指标 Indexes | PEG 6000 | NaCl | 指标累计可塑性指数 Total PI | |||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||
GR | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 2.96 | |
GI | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 3.71 | |
MGT | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.37 | |
Ⅵ | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 3.88 | |
ABS | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.15 | 1.84 | |
RDW | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 1.82 | |
SB | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 1.78 | |
RSR | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 2.62 | |
AWP | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 1.34 | |
UWP | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 1.07 | |
RL | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 4.43 | |
RSA | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 3.80 | |
SRL | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 3.89 | |
SRA | 0.77 | 0.47 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.83 | 0.57 | 3.85 | |
Total PI | 8.12 | 8.32 | 7.12 | 6.62 | 6.93 | 5.27 |
曹帮华. 刺槐抗旱抗盐特性研究. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2005. | |
Cao B H . Characteristics of drought and salt resistance of Robinia pseudoacacia. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2005. | |
柴媛媛, 史团省, 谷卫彬. 种子萌发期甜高粱对盐胁迫的响应及其耐盐性综合评价分析. 种子, 2008, (2): 43- 47. | |
Chai Y Y , Shi T S , Gu W B . Response to salt stresses and salt-resistance evaluation of sweet Sorghum during seed germination stage. Seed, 2008, (2): 43- 47. | |
崔竣岭. NaCl处理对刺槐和丁香种子萌发的影响. 宁夏农林科技, 2013, 54 (11): 31- 33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-204X.2013.11.018 |
|
Cui J L . Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination of Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Syzygium aromaticum. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2013, 54 (11): 31- 33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-204X.2013.11.018 |
|
崔兴云, 陈丽妍, 周彬, 等. 等渗NaCl和PEG胁迫对黑果枸杞种子萌发的影响. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版), 2018, 27 (3): 39- 44.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0834.2018.03.010 |
|
Cui X Y , Chen L Y , Zhou B , et al. Effects and mechanism research of iso-osmotic potential NaCl and PEG stress on seed germination of Lycium ruthenicum. Journal of Henan Institute of Education (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 27 (3): 39- 44.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0834.2018.03.010 |
|
崔兴云. 等渗NaCl和PEG胁迫对黑果枸杞种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2019. | |
Cui X Y . Effects and mechanism research of iso-osmotic potential NaCl and PEG stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Lycium ruthenicum. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2019. | |
付锦雪, 张晨星, 王晓霞, 等. 水分胁迫和种子大小对侧柏种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2020, 39 (2): 50- 57.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2690.2020.02.033 |
|
Fu J X , Zhang C X , Wang X X , et al. Effects of water stress and seed size on seed germination of Platycladus orientalis. Seed, 2020, 39 (2): 50- 57.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2690.2020.02.033 |
|
付锦雪. 侧柏人工林更新机制及影响因子初步研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020. | |
Fu J X . Preliminary study on regeneration mechanism and influencing factors of Platycladus orientalis plantation. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
高志刚. 植物种子大小与幼苗生长策略研究进展. 农业开发与装备, 2015, 4 (4): 32- 33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9205.2015.04.028 |
|
Gao Z G . Research progress on plant seed size and seedling growth strategy. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2015, 4 (4): 32- 33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9205.2015.04.028 |
|
郭有燕, 刘宏军, 余宏远, 等. 种子大小和干旱胁迫对文冠果幼苗生长的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44 (8): 143- 147. | |
Guo Y Y , Liu H J , Yu H Y , et al. Effects of seed size and drought stress on growth of Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44 (8): 143- 147. | |
季杨, 张新全, 彭燕, 等. 干旱胁迫对鸭茅根系生长及叶片光合特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 24 (10): 2763- 2769. | |
Ji Y , Zhang X Q , Peng Y , et al. Effects of drought stress on the root growth and photosynthetic characters of Dactylis glomerata seedlings. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 24 (10): 2763- 2769. | |
李冬琴, 曾鹏程, 陈桂葵, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种豆科灌木生物量分配和生理特性的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36 (1): 33- 39. | |
Li D Q , Zeng P C , Chen G K , et al. Effects of drought stress on biomass distribution and physiological characteristics in three kinds of leguminous shrubs. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016, 36 (1): 33- 39. | |
李轲, 杨柳. 刺槐根际土壤水浸提液对5种常见园林植物种子萌发及幼苗生长的化感作用. 种子, 2019, 38 (6): 115- 120.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2690.2019.06.100 |
|
Li K , Yang L . Allelopathic effects of aqueous extracts from rhizosphere soil of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. on seed germination and seedling growth of five kinds of common garden plants. Seed, 2019, 38 (6): 115- 120.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2690.2019.06.100 |
|
麦苗苗, 石大兴, 王米力, 等. PEG处理对连香树种子萌发与芽苗生长的影响. 林业科学, 2009, 45 (10): 94- 99. | |
Mai M M , Shi D X , Wang M L , et al. Seed germination and seedling growth of Cercidiphyllum japonicum with PEG Treatment. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45 (10): 94- 99. | |
毛恋, 芦建国, 江海燕. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的机制. 分子植物育种, 2019, 18 (10): 3441- 3448. | |
Mao L , Lu J G , Jiang H Y . Mechanisms of plant responses to salt-alkali stress. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 18 (10): 3441- 3448. | |
牛素贞, 宋勤飞, 樊卫国, 等. 干旱胁迫对喀斯特地区野生茶树幼苗生理特性及根系生长的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (21): 7333- 7341. | |
Niu S Z , Song Q F , Fan W G , et al. Effects of drought stress on leaf physiological characteristics and root growth of the clone seedling of wild tea plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (21): 7333- 7341. | |
沈禹颖, 王锁民, 陈亚明. 盐胁迫对牧草种子的萌发及其恢复的影响. 草业学报, 1999, 8 (3): 54- 60.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.1999.03.009 |
|
Shen Y Y , Wang S M , Chen Y M . The effect of saline condition on the germination and its recovery of pasture species. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1999, 8 (3): 54- 60.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.1999.03.009 |
|
宋丽华, 周月君. 盐胁迫对臭椿种子发芽的影响. 种子, 2008, 27 (9): 22- 25. | |
Song L H , Zhou Y J . Effect of salt stress on the germination of seed in Ailanthus altissima. Seed, 2008, 27 (9): 22- 25. | |
宋丽华. NaCl处理对刺槐种子萌发的影响. 防护林科技, 2008, (6): 19- 21.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2008.06.007 |
|
Song L H . Effect of NaCl treatment on seed germination of Robinia pseudoacacia. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2008, (6): 19- 21.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2008.06.007 |
|
王宝增. 低浓度NaCl对玉米、小麦生长效应的基础研究. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2004. | |
Wang B Z . Effects of low concentration NaCI on the growth of Zea maJ L. and Tritieum aestvum L. Jinan: Shandong Normal University, 2004. | |
王方琳, 柴成武, 尉秋实, 等. 沙埋和种子大小对沙蒿种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35 (6): 129- 134. | |
Wang F L , Chai C W , Wei Q S , et al. Effects of sand burying and seed size on the germination and seedling growth of Artemisia desertorum. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35 (6): 129- 134. | |
王慧慧, 王普昶, 赵钢, 等. 干旱胁迫下白刺花种子大小与萌发对策. 生态学报, 2016, 36 (2): 335- 341. | |
Wang H H , Wang P C , Zhao G , et al. Seed size and germination strategy of Sophora davidii under drought stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36 (2): 335- 341. | |
王慧慧, 王普昶, 赵钢, 等. 温度和PEG胁迫对刺槐种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2014, 33 (6): 1- 4.1-4, 9 | |
Wang H H , Wang P C , Zhao G , et al. Effect of temperature and PEG stress on seed gemination of Robinia pseudoacacia. Seed, 2014, 33 (6): 1- 4.1-4+9 | |
王俊杰, 乔鑫, 徐红江, 等. "金冠霞帔"文冠果种实性状可塑性. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38 (2): 476- 485. | |
Wang J J , Qiao X , Xu H J , et al. Phenotypic plasticity in seed and fruit of new variety "Jinguanxiapei" of Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38 (2): 476- 485. | |
王秀丽, 高云晓, 张曦, 等. 种子大小和枯落物覆盖对黑松种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2019, 39 (1): 35- 42.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.01.006 |
|
Wang X L , Gao Y X , Zhang X , et al. Effect of seed size and litter thickness on germination and seedling growth of Pinus thunbergii. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 39 (1): 35- 42.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.01.006 |
|
武高林, 杜国祯. 植物种子大小与幼苗生长策略研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19 (1): 191- 197. | |
Wu G L , Du G Z . Relationships between seed size and seedling growth strategy of herbaceous plant: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 19 (1): 191- 197. | |
薛建国, 韩建国, 王显国, 等. NaCl和PEG对华北驼绒藜和梭梭种子萌发的影响. 草地学报, 2008, 16 (5): 470- 474. | |
Xue J G , Han J G , Wang X G , et al. Effects of NaCl and PEG on seed germination of two xerophytic species Ceratoides arborescens and Haloxylon ammodendron. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2008, 16 (5): 470- 474. | |
闫兴富, 邓晓娟, 王静, 等. 种子大小和干旱胁迫对辽东栎幼苗生长和生理特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31 (10): 3331- 3339. | |
Yan X F , Deng X J , Wang J , et al. Effects of seed size and drought stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Quercus wutaishanica seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 31 (10): 3331- 3339. | |
杨斌. 刺槐幼苗对水分胁迫的响应: 基于生长、生理及非结构性碳的分配与动态. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019. | |
Yang B . Response of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings to soil water stress: Based on growth, physiology and the allocation and dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2019. | |
杨海莉. 小花碱茅对渗透胁迫与等渗透势盐胁迫的生理响应. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
Yang H L . Physiological response of Puccinellia tenuiflora to osmotic and isotonic salt stress. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. | |
杨贺雨, 卫海燕, 桑满杰, 等. 华中五味子叶表型可塑性及环境因子对叶表型的影响. 植物学报, 2016, 51 (3): 322- 334. | |
Yang H Y , Wei H Y , Sang M J , et al. Phenotypic plasticity of schisandra sphenanthera leaf and the effect of environmental factors on leaf phenotype. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2016, 51 (3): 322- 334. | |
姚小兰, 周琳, 冯茂松, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同基质网袋桢楠幼苗生长及生物量的影响. 植物研究, 2018, 38 (1): 81- 90. | |
Yao X L , Zhou L , Feng M S , et al. Effects of drought dtress on the growth and biomass of Phoebe zhennan' seedling in different substrates net Container. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38 (1): 81- 90. | |
尹锴. 2019. 母树年龄和立地条件对刺槐种子抗盐萌发的影响. 泰安: 山东农业大学. | |
Yin K. 2019. Effects of maternal tree age and site conditions on salt resistant germination of Robinia pseudoacacia Seeds. Shandong Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
於丽华, 耿贵. 等渗胁迫下NaCl和PEG对甜菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响. 中国糖料, 2008, (3): 33- 35.33-35, 39 | |
Yu L H , Geng G . Effect of iso-osmotic NaCl and PEG stress on Sugarbeet seed germination and seedling growth. Sugar Crops of China, 2008, (3): 33- 35.33-35, 39 | |
张桂玲. 等渗透势盐分和水分胁迫对白刺幼苗生长及离子吸收分配的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31 (4): 114- 118. | |
Zhnag G L . Effects of iso-osmotic salt and water stresses on growth and ionic absorption and distribution in Nitraria sibirica. Seedlings Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31 (4): 114- 118. | |
张金峰, 程继铭, 闫兴富, 等. 2020. 种子特征和播种深度对辽东栎种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 广西植物, 40(2): 226-236. | |
Zhang J F, Cheng J M, Yan X F, et al. Effects of seed characteristics and sowing depth on seedgermination and seedling growth of Quercus wutaishanica. Guihaia, 40(2): 226-236. [in Chinese] | |
张紫薇, 庞春花, 张永清, 等. 等渗NaCl和PEG胁迫及复水处理对藜麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 作物杂志, 2017, (1): 119- 126. | |
Zhang Z W , Pang C H , Zhang Y Q , et al. Effects of isosmotic NaCl and PEG stress and rehydration treatment on seed germination and seedling growth of quinoa. Crops, 2017, (1): 119- 126. | |
中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993: 228 | |
hinese flora Editorial Committee, Chinese Academy of Sciences . Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press, 1993: 228 | |
朱敏嘉, 黄俊华, 刘岩, 等. 水盐胁迫对阿尔泰狗娃花种子萌发的影响. 中国野生植物资源, 2017, 36 (3): 31- 36. | |
Zhu M J , Huang J H , Liu Y , et al. Effect of water and salt stress on seed germination of Heteropappus altaicus (Willd.) Novopokr. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2017, 36 (3): 31- 36. | |
邹邦基. 植物营养. 北京: 科学出版社, 1982: 296- 298. | |
Zou B J . Plant nutrition. Beijing: Science Press, 1982: 296- 298. | |
Guo W , Li B , Zhang X , et al. Architectural plasticity and growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana intermedia seedling to simulated water stress. Journal of Arid Environments, 2007, 69 (3): 385- 399. | |
Hopper N W , Overholt J R , Martin J R . Effects of cultivar, temperature and seed size on the germination and mergence of Soy beans. Glycinemax. L. Merr. Annals of Botany, 1979, 44 (3): 301- 308. | |
Inze D , Montaga M V . Oxidative stress in plants. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 1997, 6 (2): 153- 158. | |
Mao P L , Guo L M , Gao Y X , et al. Effects of seed size and sand burial on germination and early growth of seedlings for coastal Pinus thunbergii Parl.in the Northern Shandong Peninsula, China. Forests, 2019, 10 (3) | |
Michel B E , Kaufmann M R . The osmotic potential of polyethylene Glycol 6000. Plant Physiology, 1973, 51 (5): 914- 916. | |
Venable D L , Brown J S . The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. The American Naturalist, 1988, 131 (3): 360- 384. | |
Zhao L L , Mo B T , Wang P C , et al. Relationship of Sophora davidii seed size to germination, dormancy, and mortality under water stress. South African Journal of Botany, 2015, 99, 12- 16. |
[1] | 姚俊广, 耿娅, 刘依静, 安轶, 黄李超, 曾为, 卢孟柱. S-腺苷甲硫氨酸脱羧酶基因对银腺杨84K抗旱性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2): 125-132. |
[2] | 祁琳,郭龙梅,刘尤德,曹帮华,毛培利,李泽秀. 刺槐幼苗非结构性碳水化合物对NaCl胁迫的动态响应[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 32-42. |
[3] | 赵秀婷,王延双,段劼,马履一,何宝华,贾忠奎,桑子阳,朱仲龙. 盐胁迫对红花玉兰嫁接苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4): 43-53. |
[4] | 王艳梅,张小雪,朱秀征,张志华,李志,耿晓东,蔡齐飞,刘震. 林木种子休眠与萌发机制研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(10): 128-144. |
[5] | 杨茂林,冀晓东,孙恒,丛旭,杨光,侯凯,任一凡. 不同年龄刺槐枝、干和根的物理力学性质对比[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(7): 115-122. |
[6] | 孙明升,胡颖,陈旋,罗群凤,杨章旗. 外源调节物质对干旱胁迫下格木幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(10): 165-172. |
[7] | 杨阳,王海洋,马立辉. 濒危植物树枫杜鹃的结实及种子萌发特性[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(10): 173-183. |
[8] | 陶晨悦, 邵珊璐, 史文辉, 林琳, 汤祎磊, 应叶青. 氮沉降对干旱胁迫下毛竹实生苗生物量和保护酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9): 31-40. |
[9] | 樊婷婷, 高尚坤, 孟凡玲, 尹红增, 李超, 王庆华, 周成刚. 外来入侵新害虫刺槐突瓣细蛾在中国的适生区预测[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 86-95. |
[10] | 蒋铮, 于倩楠, 乔明锋, 肖娟, 张子良, 尹华军. 云杉幼树根系分泌物对2种草本植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 160-166. |
[11] | 刘道凤, 王霞, 代银, 杨建峰, 马婧, 李名扬, 眭顺照. 蜡梅转录因子CpTAF10基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 176-183. |
[12] | 王怡霖, 王卫锋, 张芸香, 常淑君, 郭晋平. 碧玉杨叶形态结构与生理特性对干旱的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 42-50. |
[13] | 江成, 周厚君, 赵岩秋, 何辉, 楚立威, 宋学勤, 卢孟柱. 干旱和高盐胁迫下钙离子依赖核酸酶基因CDD对银腺杨84K生长发育的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 33-40. |
[14] | 赵佳强, 石娟. 基于新型最大熵模型预测刺槐叶瘿蚊(双翅目:瘿蚊科)在中国的适生区[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 118-127. |
[15] | 罗晓蔓, 丁贵杰, 王艺. 菌根化马尾松苗木根际土壤浸提物有效成份及其对种子萌发的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(8): 32-38. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||