欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 103-110.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190613

• 论文与研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

木质阻尼复合结构中填充多孔材料的隔声性能分析

刘美宏, 彭立民, 樊正强   

  1. 中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 北京 100091
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-04 修回日期:2018-12-02 出版日期:2019-06-25 发布日期:2019-07-11
  • 基金资助:
    "十二五"国家科技支撑计划课题"木质隔声和发热新材料制造关键技术与示范"(2015BAD14B04)。

Analysis of Sound Insulation Performance of Porous Materials Filled in Wood Damping Structures

Liu Meihong, Peng Limin, Fan Zhengqiang   

  1. Research Institute of Wood Industry, CAF Beijing 100091
  • Received:2018-05-04 Revised:2018-12-02 Online:2019-06-25 Published:2019-07-11

摘要: [目的]利用吸声材料的吸声降噪机制、隔声材料的隔声降噪机制和阻尼材料的阻尼降噪机制,将3种降噪材料以一定形式复合,获得一种兼具吸声、隔声和阻尼性能的新型木质阻尼复合隔声材料,以改善木质材料隔声性能,拓宽木质材料和阻尼材料的应用范围。[方法]先将中密度纤维板(MDF)与橡胶材料在压板温度100℃、单位压力3 MPa、加压时间10 min、涂胶量64 g·m-2的工艺条件下进行复合,再利用白乳胶将获得的木质阻尼复合材料与吸声材料粘接,采用小混响室-消声箱法测试复合结构隔声性能,探讨中密度纤维板(MDF)厚度、多孔材料厚度、填充方式、多孔材料种类和阻尼结构等因素对隔声性能的影响。[结果]木质阻尼复合结构中填充聚酯纤维、玻璃纤维和三聚氰胺吸声棉3种不同多孔吸声材料时,在整个频率段,3条隔声性能曲线趋于一致,区别不明显,从减轻复合结构质量及环保角度出发,选择三聚氰胺吸声棉作为填充多孔材料。多孔材料填充方式(BB:利用白乳胶将多孔材料直接粘贴在上下表板上,不含空气层;UU:多孔材料与上下表板不粘接,通过一定厚度空气层分离;BU:多孔材料一侧粘贴在上表板上,另一侧与下表板通过空气层分隔)对复合结构隔声性能具有较大影响,其中BU结构的隔声性能较优。吸声材料与空气层相配合,在不增加复合结构厚度和质量的前提下,可有效提高复合结构的隔声性能,当吸声材料填满空腔时,反而不利于复合结构隔声性能的提高。多孔材料与空气层阻抗不匹配,会增加声波传播途径,声能被损耗。在最佳填充结构的基础上,随着多孔材料厚度从5 mm增加到15 mm,复合结构的隔声性能增加。在低频,共振频率处的隔声性能增加;在临界频率处,多孔材料厚度增加,抑制复合材料的吻合效应,吻合谷变浅,隔声性能增加。MDF厚度增加,复合结构的面密度和刚度增大,可增加复合结构中低频的隔声性能。阻尼结构设计对复合结构隔声性能具有很大影响,自由阻尼结构的耗散能量较小,特别是低频减振效果较差;约束阻尼结构受到振动时,约束层的伸长远远小于黏弹性阻尼层,约束层会阻碍阻尼层的伸长运动;当阻尼层受到压缩时,约束层又会阻碍阻尼层的压缩变形。在阻尼层内除产生拉压变形外,还会产生剪切变形,从而起到比自由阻尼处理更大的耗散振动能作用,阻尼降噪能力更强,可更有效抑制复合结构的共振频率及吻合效应。[结论]表板厚度为6 mm,约束阻尼结构,多孔材料的填充形式为BU结构,填充10 mm三聚氰胺吸声棉和5 mm空气层,复合结构的隔声性能较优。

关键词: 木质阻尼, 多孔材料, 填充, 小混响室-消声箱法, 隔声性能

Abstract: [Objective] Through the comparison among the estimated result of the soil organic carbon density in the spruce (Picea asperata) and red birch (Betula albosinensis) natural forests in the Xinjiashan Forest Farm in Qinling Mountains with different estimation method, we tested the improvement of the new method on estimation accuracy by subtracting the root volume.[Method] The organic carbon densities of the mineral soil layers (top soil layer, core soil layer and subsoil layer) and organic soil layers (non/semi-decomposed layer namely L + F and fully decomposed layer of litter namely H) were estimated separately. For the estimation of the organic carbon density in the mineral soil layer, the estimation accuracy is improved by deducting the root volume of trees based on the existing method. The method for estimating the volume content of roots in each layer contains 4 steps as follow. Firstly, the root biomass of a single tree was estimated with the regression equations proposed by the previous study, which is multiplied by the growth density of the forest to obtain the total biomass of the roots per unit area of the forest land; secondly, by measuring the biomass and the volume of a partial sample of the root system,the density of the partial root sample is calculated to represent the density of the whole root system; then, the total root volume of the forest area per unit area is calculated by dividing the total biomass of the roots per unit area of the root system by the density of the root system; Finally, according to the distribution result of the root system along the depth obtained in previous studies, the total root volume per unit area is distributed to each soil layer and the content of root volume is calculated. For the estimation of the carbon density of the organic soil layer,the volume of the base of the trunk contained in the organic soil layer is subtracted, which is calculated with the mean ground diameter. In addition, due to the extremely uneven distribution of different components in the organic soil layer, the different components in the litter (organic soil layer) are carefully grouped according to the source organs and physical forms, and the organic carbon content of each component is determined.[Result] Thicknesses of top soil layer (A), core soil layer(B) and subsoil layer(C) were 19.10, 14.20, 31.03 cm and 18.57, 15.13, 28.13 cm for the spruce and the red birch, respectively. The SOC contents in A, B and C horizons were (44.56±3.72) g·kg-1, (25.63±1.77) g·kg-1 and (10.79±2.28) g·kg-1 respectively for spruce;they were (34.11±5.46) g·kg-1, (19.06±4.95) g·kg-1 and (11.02±3.86) g·kg-1 respectively for red birch. The carbon contents of various components in organic soil layer of the two stands were significantly different (P < 0.05). The organic carbon contents of spruce cones, moss, tree branches and roots in litters were greater than 600 g·kg-1. Followed by the organic carbon contents of leaves, which were (458.90±46.81) g·kg-1 for spruce forest and (420.72±55.66) g·kg-1 for red birch forest. The organic carbon contents of other undistinguishable fine particles was the minimum which were less than 300 g·kg-1. The root volumes in A, B and C horizons were 66.81 (3.5%), 20.69 (1.5%) and 9.18 (0.3%) m3·hm-2 respectively for spruce, and they were 50.57 (2.7%), 31.75 (2.1%) and 17.22 (0.6%) m3·hm-1 respectively for red birch. The carbon density of organic soil layers was 4.26 kg·m-2 for spruce, less than that of the original method by 0.73%; H and L+F layers accounted for 84% and 16% respectively; the carbon density of mineral soil layers was 16.58 kg·m-2, less than that of the original method by 2.13%. The carbon density of organic soil layers was 3.49 kg·m-2 for red birch, less than that of the original method by 0.48%; H and L + F layers accounted for 90% and 10%; the carbon density of mineral soil layers was 14.06 kg·m-2 for red birch, less than that of the original method by 1.61%.[Conclusion] The estimated total organic carbon densities of soil in spruce forest and red birch forest decreased by 1.85% and 1.39% respectively after deducting the content of root volume, which suggested that the currently-estimated forest soil carbon storage might be generally higher than the actual value.

Key words: wood damping, porous material, filled, small reverberation chamber-anechoic chamber method, sound insulation performance

中图分类号: