欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (9): 67-76.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160908

• 论文与研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

原风景对城市植物景观感知的影响

龚鹏, 张绿水, 古新仁   

  1. 江西农业大学园林与艺术学院 南昌 330045
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-06 修回日期:2015-12-16 出版日期:2016-09-25 发布日期:2016-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 古新仁
  • 基金资助:
    江西省社会科学“十二五”(2015)规划项目“农民工对城市公园环境景观感知研究”(15WT10);南昌市社会科学“十二五”(2014年)规划项目“农民工对城市植物景观感知研究——南昌市农民工融入城市文明”(Sh201402)。

Influences of Prototype Landscape on People's Perceptions of Urban Plant Landscape

Gong Peng, Zhang Lüshui, Gu Xinren   

  1. College of Landscape and Art, Jiangxi Agricultural University Nanchang 330045
  • Received:2015-09-06 Revised:2015-12-16 Online:2016-09-25 Published:2016-10-20

摘要: [目的] 原风景是指人在幼年时期到青少年时期所处的生活环境在内心深处留下深刻印象的风景,它极大地影响着人们对景观的感知。以往在植物景观感知方面的研究很少涉及到原风景层面。本文旨在探讨原风景类型的不同对城市植物景观感知所产生的影响,为当下城镇化建设中植物景观营造提供理论基础。[方法] 将原风景类型人群分为城市类型、城乡结合部类型、乡村类型。调查在以北亚热带绿化区植物景观为代表的南昌城市里进行。采用标准化问卷形式,分别让来自南方地区的120名大学生在5处城市植物景观环境实地中对植物景观的6类感知类型中的22种感知因子进行分级评价,对不同原风景类型人群间的感知评价结果进行偏好均值比较、因子间方差分析和类型间相关性分析。[结果] 1)评价均值表明:所有人群对植物场景偏好的评价与植物空间的大小正相关;城市类型人群对植物景观评价均值普遍偏高。2)通过感知因子层面的评价结果可以看出:在吸引力感知因子方面,城市类型的人群与城乡结合部类型人群有着明显的差异,而乡村类型的人群与其他类型人群没有明显差异;在舒畅度、生命力、宁静感、亮度的评价结果中,城市类型和乡村类型人群之间的评价结果有明显的差异性;在神秘性、熟悉感、宁静感、空间连续和亮度的感知因子中,城市类型人群的评价值与城乡结合部类型人群有明显差异。3)通过不同类型人群偏好与其他感知类型的相关性分析发现,人群性别和原风景类型二者对偏好的影响没有交互作用(Sig.=0.253);从相关系数发现,影响城市类型人群植物景观偏好的感知类型排序为:心理感受(r=0.672)>植物色彩(r=0.566)>整体环境(r=0.473)>植物空间(r=0.462)>植物形态(r=0.414);影响城乡结合部类型人群植物景观偏好的感知类型排序为:心理感受(r=0.821)>整体环境(r=0.636) > 植物色彩(r=0.626) > 植物空间(r=0.577) > 植物形态(r=0.527);影响乡村类型人群植物景观偏好的感知类型排序为:心理感受(r=0.760) > 植物形态(r=0.675) > 整体环境(r=0.658) > 植物色彩(r=0.619) > 植物空间(r=0.579)。[结论] 通过不同原风景类型人群对城市植物景观的评价,城乡结合部类型人群在植物景观感知因子层面上与乡村类型人群较为相似,在植物景观感知类型对偏好影响程度的层面上与城市类型人群较为相似,说明城乡结合部类型人群对植物景观评价标准呈现出既有城市又有乡村的影响。

关键词: 原风景, 城市植物景观, 景观感知, 偏好

Abstract: [Objective] "Prototype landscape" refers to the impressive scenes that one has experienced from childhood to adolescence living environment. It greatly affects the people's perception of the landscape. In the past the research on urban plant landscape perception was rarely related to the "prototype landscape" level. The main purpose for this topic is to explore whether different "prototype landscape" types will have an impact on the urban plant landscape perception and to provide the relevant theoretical basis for the construction of urban plant landscape during the present urbanization.[Method] Prototype landscapes were divided into urban group,urban-rural interface group and rural group. A survey was carried out with standardized questionnaire in Nanchang where plant landscape of north subtropical plants is typical. 120 university students were invited from south China to evaluate 22 perception factors of 6 perception types in 5 different landscapes in the city, in order to compare preference values, variance of perception factors and correlation of perception types among different perceptions of the three prototype landscape groups.[Result] 1) The average preference value of plant landscapes was positively correlated with the size of plant space, and the preference values of urban group were generally high. 2) There was significant differences in attractiveness between the urban group and the urban-rural interface group, and no significant differences between the rural group and others. There were significant differences between urban group and rural group in terms of comfortableness, vitality, tranquility and brightness of the landscapes; and there were significant differences between urban group and urban-rural interface group in mystery, familiarity, tranquility, spatial continuity and brightness. 3) There was no interaction between the impacts of gender and prototype landscape on preferences(Sig.=0.253);Based on the correlation coefficients, perception types influencing the plant landscape preferences of urban group were ranked in the following order: psychological feeling(r=0.672) > plant colors(r=0.566) > the whole environment(r=0.473) > plant space(r=0.462) > plant morphology(r=0.414); those of the urban-rural interface group were in the rank: psychological feeling(r=0.821)> the whole environment(r=0.636) > plant colors(r=0.626) > plant space(r=0.577)> plant morphology(r=0.527);and those of the rural group were in the rank: psychological feeling(r=0.760) > plant morphology(r=0.675) > the whole environment(r=0.658)> plant colors(r=0.619)> plant space(r=0.579). [Conclusion] The urban-rural interface group was similar to the rural group in perception factors, and similar to the urban group in the impacts of perception types on their preferences, indicating that the plant landscape perception of the urban-rural interface group were affected by both urban and rural.

Key words: prototype landscape, urban plant landscape, landscape perception, preference

中图分类号: