白杨无性系叶片水力及经济性状与生物量的关系

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20210981

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: Both leaf hydraulic and economic traits affect biomass accumulation as they can quantify and reflect the ability of plants to acquire water-carbon resources and their trade-off strategies. This study aims to explore the relationship between leaf hydraulic and economic traits and biomass of poplar clones, so as to find a reliable index for predicting clonal biomass, which could have guiding significance for early breeding of high-yield and fast-growing clones. Method: Eight 4-year-old white poplar clones with different growth rates and derived from the same parents (Populus alba 'I-101' × (P. Alba × P. Glandulosa) '84K') were used as the study subjects. Hydraulic traits (leaf vascular hydraulic conductance K_leaves_HPFM, leaf hydraulic conductance K_leaf_EFM, vein density VD, vessel diameter D_v, hydraulic weighted vessel diameter D_h, stomatal density SD and stomatal length SL) and the economic traits (specific leaf area SLA, leaf total carbon content C, leaf total nitrogen content N, and leaf total carbon/nitrogen ratio C/N) were measured in the growing season (July to September). Above-ground biomass (AGB) was calculated at the end of the growing season (October). Then the variations of biomass, leaf hydraulic and economic traits among the clones were analyzed to investigate the relationships among them. Result: There were significant differences in above-ground biomass, leaf hydraulic and economic traits among the clones. The AGB overall ranked as follows: K1 > K2 > K3 > Z2 > Z1 > M3 > Z3 > M1, suggesting that the growth trend of most clones was consistent with the parent tree (8-year-old). Compared with that of leaf economic traits, the variation coefficient of hydraulic traits was larger (2.0%-12.0% VS 4.5%-13.2%). Leaf hydraulic traits and economic traits decoupled with each other, however, they were both related to above-ground biomass. In terms of hydraulic traits, K_leaves_HPFM, VD, D_v and D_h increased with AGB, all showing a significant positive correlation. However, SD, SL and K_leaf_EFM were not correlated with AGB. As for economic traits, SLA was significantly negatively correlated with AGB, while C, N and C/N were not correlated with AGB. Further multiple linear regression analysis showed that VD was the main index affecting biomass (t = 2.957). Conclusion: The white poplar clones show a steady growth trend, and there are differences in leaf hydraulic and economic traits among the clones, which would provide a possibility for finding predictive biomass indicators at early growth stage. Compared with leaf economic traits, hydraulic traits can be the better predictors of the aboveground biomass of those clones, with vein density (VD) being the key factor.

Key words: poplar clones, intra-specific variation, leaf hydraulic traits, leaf economic traits, above-ground biomass

CLC Number:

S718

Wei Wang,Han Zhao,Xin Huang,Zhuoliang Hou,Zaimin Jiang,Jing Cai. Relationship Between Leaf Hydraulic and Economic Traits and Biomass of Poplar Clones[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(10): 89-98.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 3

Fig.4

Table 4

References 0

	龚　容, 高　琼. 叶片结构的水力学特性对植物生理功能影响的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39 (3): 300- 308. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0029
	Gong R, Gao Q. Research progress in the effects of leaf hydraulic characteristics on plant physiological functions. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39 (3): 300- 308. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0029
	金　鹰, 王传宽. 植物叶片水力与经济性状权衡关系的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39 (10): 1021- 1032. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0099
	Jin Y, Wang C K. Trade-offs between plant leaf hydraulic and economic traits. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39 (10): 1021- 1032. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0099
	李和平. 2009. 植物显微技术. 第2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 1−285.
	Li H P. 2009. Plant microscopy technique. The second edition. Beijing: Science Press, 1−285.
	潘莹萍, 陈亚鹏. 叶片水力性状研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33 (10): 2834- 2841.
	Pan Y P, Chen Y P. Recent advances in leaf hydraulic traits. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33 (10): 2834- 2841.
	Alafas N, Marron N, Ceulemans R. Clonal variation in stomatal characteristics related to biomass production of 12 poplar (Populus) clones in a short rotation coppice culture . Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2006, 58 (1/2/3): 279- 286. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.003
	Bai X L, Zhang Y B, Liu Q, et al. 2020. Leaf and stem traits are linked to liana growth rate in a subtropical cloud forest. Forests, 2020, 11(10): 112.
	Brodribb T J, Feild T S, Jordan G J. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology, 2007, 144 (4): 1890- 1898. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.101352
	Brocious C A, Hacke U G. Stomatal conductance scales with petiole xylem traits in Populus genotypes . Functional Plant Biology, 2016, 43 (6): 553- 562. doi: 10.1071/FP15336
	Bunn S M, Rae A M, Herbert C S, et al. Leaf-level productivity traits in Populus grown in short rotation coppice for biomass energy . Forestry, 2004, 77 (4): 307- 323. doi: 10.1093/forestry/77.4.307
	Cochard H, Nardini A, Coll L. 2004. Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance? Plant, Cell & Environment, 27(10): 1257−1267.
	Dillen S Y, Marron N, Koch B, et al. Genetic variation of stomatal traits and carbon isotope discrimination in two hybrid poplar families (Populus deltoides 'S9-2' x P. nigra 'ghoy' and P. deltoides 'S9-2' x P. trichocarpa 'V24') . Annals of Botany, 2008, 102 (3): 399- 407. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn107
	Dillen S Y, Marron N, Sabatti M, et al. Relationships among productivity determinants in two hybrid poplar families grown during three years at two contrasting sites. Tree Physiology, 2009, 29 (8): 975- 987. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp036
	Fichot R, Chamaillard S, Depardieu C, et al. Hydraulic efficiency and coordination with xylem resistance to cavitation, leaf function, and growth performance among eight unrelated Populus deltoides × Populus nigra hybrids . Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62 (6): 2093- 2106. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq415
	Franks P J, Drake P L, Beerling D J. Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negative correlation between stomatal size and density: an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus. Plant Cell & Environment, 2009, 32 (12): 1737- 1748. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.002031.x
	Gebauer R, Vanbeveren S P P, Volařík D, et al. Petiole and leaf traits of poplar in relation to parentage and biomass yield. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 362, 1- 9. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.036
	Gleason S M, Blackman C J, Chang Y, et al. Weak coordination among petiole, leaf, vein, and gas-exchange traits across Australian angiosperm species and its possible implications. Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 6 (1): 267- 278. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1860
	Guet J, Fabbrini F, Fichot R, et al. Genetic variation for leaf morphology, leaf structure and leaf carbon isotope discrimination in European populations of black poplar Populus nigra . Tree Physiology, 2015, 35 (8): 850- 863. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv056
	Jin Y, Wang C, Zhou Z, et al. Coordinated performance of leaf hydraulics and economics in 10 Chinese temperate tree species. Functional Plant Biology, 2016, 43 (11): 1082- 1090. doi: 10.1071/FP16097
	Kawai K, Miyoshi R, Okada N. Bundle sheath extensions are linked to water relations but not to mechanical and structural properties of leaves. Trees-Structure and Function, 2017, 31 (4): 1227- 1237. doi: 10.1007/s00468-017-1540-8
	Kawai K, Okada N. Leaf vascular architecture in temperate dicotyledons: correlations and link to functional traits. Planta, 2020, 251 (1): 17. doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03295-z
	Lechthaler S, Kiorapostolou N, Pitacco A. et al. 2020. The total path length hydraulic resistance according to known anatomical patterns: what is the shape of the root-to-leaf tension gradient along the plant longitudinal axis? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 502: 110369.
	Li L, McCormack M L, Ma C G, et al. Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18 (9): 899- 906. doi: 10.1111/ele.12466
	Liu C, Li Y, Xu L, et al. 2019. Variation in leaf morphological, stomatal, and anatomical traits and their relationships in temperate and subtropical forests. Scientific Reports, 9.
	Liu C C, Li Y, Zhang J H, et al. 2020. Optimal community assembly related to leaf economic- hydraulic-anatomical traits. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11.
	Liu X R, Liu H, Gleason S M, et al. Water transport from stem to stomata: the coordination of hydraulic and gas exchange traits across 33 subtropical woody species. Tree Physiology, 2019, 39 (10): 1665- 1674. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz076
	Marron N, Villar M, Dreyer E, et al. Diversity of leaf traits related to productivity in 31 Populus deltoids × Populus nigra clones . Tree Physiology, 2005, 25 (4): 425- 435. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.4.425
	Marron N, Ceulemans R. Genetic variation of leaf traits related to productivity in a Populus deltoids × Populus nigra family . Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 36 (2): 390- 400. doi: 10.1139/x05-245
	Milla-Moreno E A, Mckown A D, Guy R D, et al. 2016. Leaf mass per area predicts palisade structural properties linked to mesophyll conductance in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L). Botany, 94(3): 225 −239 .
	Monclus R, Dreyer E, Delmotte F M. Productivity, leaf traits and carbon isotope discrimination in 29 Populus deltoids × P. nigra clones . New Phytologist, 2005, 167 (1): 53- 62. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01407.x
	Monclus R, Dreyer E, Villar M, et al. Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides× Populus nigra . New Phytologist, 2006, 169 (4): 765- 777. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01630.x
	Nardini A, Salleo S. Water stress-induced modifications of leaf hydraulic architecture in sunflower: coordination with gas exchange. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2005, 56 (422): 3093- 3101. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri306
	Nardini A, Pedà G, Rocca N L. Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho-anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences. New Phytologist, 2012, 196 (3): 788- 798. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04294.x
	Rae A M, Robinson K M, Street N R, et al. Morphological and physiological traits influencing biomass productivity in short rotation coppice poplar. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 34 (7): 1488- 1498. doi: 10.1139/x04-033
	Reich P B. The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102 (2): 275- 301. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12211
	Russo S E, Cannon W L, Elowsky C, et al. Variation in leaf stomatal traits of 28 tree species in relation to gas exchange along an edaphic gradient in a Bornean rain forest. American Journal of Botany, 2010, 97 (7): 1109- 1120. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900344
	Sack L, Melcher P J, Zwieniecki M A, et al. The hydraulic conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: a comparison of three measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53 (378): 2177- 2184. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf069
	Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, et al. The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: coordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell and Environment, 2003, 26 (8): 1343- 1356. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01058.x
	Sack L, Holbrook N M. Leaf hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2006, 57, 361- 381. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144141
	Scholz A, Klepsch M, Karimi Z, et al. 2013. How to quantify conduits in wood? Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 56
	Scoffoni C, Pou A, Aasamaa K, et al. The rapid light response of leaf hydraulic conductance: new evidence from two experimental methods. Plant Cell & Environment, 2008, 31 (12): 1803- 1812. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01884.x
	Scoffoni C, McKown A D, Rawls M, et al. Dynamics of leaf hydraulic conductance with water status: quantification and analysis of species differences under steady state. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63 (2): 643- 658. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err270
	Scoffoni C, Chatelet D S, Pasquet-kok J, et al. Hydraulic basis for the evolution of photosynthetic productivity. Nature Plants, 2016, 2 (6): 16072- 16079. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.72
	Thomas B N, Grace J P, Scoffoni C, et al. 2015. How does leaf anatomy influence water transport outside the xylem? Plant Physiology, 168: 1616-1635.
	Trifilo P, Petruzzellis F, Abate E, et al. The extra-vascular water pathway regulates dynamic leaf hydraulic decline and recovery in Populus nigra . Physiologia Plantarum, 2021, 172 (1): 29- 40. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13266
	Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high-and low-rainfall, and high-and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology, 2001, 15 (4): 423- 434. doi: 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x
	Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428 (6985): 821- 827. doi: 10.1038/nature02403
	Xiong D L, Nadal M. Linking water relations and hydraulics with photosynthesis. Plant Journal, 2020, 101 (4): 800- 815. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14595
	Yang S D, Tyree M T. Hydraulic architecture of Acer saccharum and A. rubrum: comparison of branches to whole trees and the contribution of leaves to hydraulic resistance . Journal of Experimental Botany, 1994, 45 (271): 179- 186.
	Yin Q, Wang L, Lei M, Dang H, et al. The relationships between leaf economics and hydraulic traits of woody plants depend on water availability. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621, 245- 252. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.171
	Yu Q B. 2001. Can physiological and anatomical characters be used for selecting high yielding hybrid aspen clones? Silva Fennica, 35(2): 137−146.
	Zhang X, Zang R, Li C. Population differences in physiological and morphological adaptations of Populus davidiana seedlings in response to progressive drought stress . Plant Science, 2004, 166 (3): 791- 797. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.016
	Zhao H, Jiang Z M, Zhang Y J, et al. 2021. Hydraulic efficiency at the whole tree level stably correlated with productivity over years in 9 poplar hybrids clones. Forest Ecology and Management, 496(4): 119382.

指标Indicators		无性系Clones
指标Indicators		K1	K2	K3	Z1	Z2	Z3	M1	M3	CV（%）
叶水力性状 Leaf hydraulic traits	K_leavesHPFM（×10⁴）	3.19±0.54a	3.01±0.47a	2.54±0.34a	2.73±0.34a	2.80±0.09a	2.94±0.54a	2.07±0.18a	2.43±0.12a	13.2
	K_{leaf EFM}	7.74±0.72a	7.59±0.81a	6.70±0.58a	7.81±1.5a	8.05±0.51a	8.40±1.12a	6.73±0.64a	8.49±1.08a	8.8
	VD	1.56±0.06a	1.55±0.03a	1.57±0.03a	1.54±0.05a	1.50±0.06a	1.42±0.05ab	1.24±0.04b	1.25±0.05b	9.4
	D_v	20.62±1.04a	18.20±1.42ab	16.63±1.61abc	14.98±0.29bc	13.62±0.58c	16.42±0.83abc	13.50±0.50c	14.46±0.36bc	5.3
	D_h	23.02±0.86a	19.46±1.64ab	18.33±1.52ab	17.19±0.44b	16.25±0.41b	18.86±0.95ab	15.29±0.68b	16.24±0.33b	4.5
	SD	460.16±28.20c	506.71±14.84abc	498.71±29.51bc	439.56±12.86c	582.81±18.18ac	454.55±13.74c	606.67±33.21a	502.83±25.28abc	11.9
	SL	25.67±0.27a	22.78±0.20c	23.04±0.18bc	23.85±0.29b	20.88±0.20e	23.06±0.29bc	22.23±0.25cd	21.59±0.31de	6.4
叶经济性状 Leaf economic traits	SLA	147.46±6.67cd	149.04±1.90bcd	150.45±4.03bcd	181.82±13.24ab	143.81±6.64d	181.03±8.32abc	194.76±9.13a	156.13±4.54bcd	12.0
	C	46.61±0.25a	45.62±0.23ab	43.63±0.64c	46.24±0.33ab	45.07±0.37abc	45.59±0.39ab	45.43±0.21ab	44.91±0.25bc	2.0
	N	3.15±0.13ab	3.28±0.10a	2.68±0.12b	3.12±0.09ab	2.67±0.10b	3.09±0.08ab	2.92±0.07ab	3.22±0.13a	7.7
	C/N	15.57±0.54abc	13.71±0.35c	16.43±0.75ab	14.22±0.42bc	16.98±0.70a	15.32±0.58abc	15.61±0.35abc	14.51±0.66abc	7.2

指标Indicators		叶水力性状Leaf hydraulic traits							叶经济性状Leaf economic traits
指标Indicators		K_{leaves HPFM}	K_{leaf EFM}	VD	logD_v	logD_h	SD	SL	SLA	N	C	C/N
叶片水力性状 Leaf hydraulic traits	K_{leaves HPFM}	1
	K_{leaf EFM}	0.44	1
	VD	0.73*	?0.11	1
	logD_v	0.77*	0.00	0.60	1
	logD_h	0.84**	0.09	0.64	0.98**	1
	SD	?0.60	?0.39	?0.47	?0.62	?0.64	1
	SL	0.53	?0.13	0.49	0.81*	0.82*	?0.68	1
叶片经济性状 Leaf economic traits	SLA	?0.51	?0.16	?0.60	?0.43	?0.52	0.04	?0.02	1
	N	0.33	0.46	?0.13	0.43	0.36	?0.51	0.37	0.08	1
	C	0.49	0.34	0.10	0.35	0.41	?0.34	0.56	0.14	0.63	1
	C/N	?0.14	?0.26	0.08	?0.24	?0.13	0.45	?0.22	?0.18	?0.90**	?0.44	1

因子Parameters	系数Coefficients	t	VIF	R²	P
常量 Constant	2.548	1.291	—	0.876	0.005
叶脉密度 VD	2.582	2.957	1.362
比叶面积 SLA	?0.018	?2.894	1.362

分组 Group	指标 Traits	主成分1 PC1	主成分2 PC2
生物量 Biomass	AGB	0.34	?0.26
叶水力性状 Leaf hydraulic traits	K_{leaves HPFM}	0.37	?0.08
	K_{leaf EFM}	0.11	0.22
	VD	0.29	?0.33
	logD_V	0.37	?0.07
	logD_h	0.38	?0.04
	SD	?0.32	?0.14
	SL	0.32	0.07
叶经济性状 Leaf economic traits	SLA	?0.22	0.36
	C	0.21	0.35
	N	0.21	0.49
	C/N	?0.14	?0.48
	% of variance	49.0	22.1

[1]	Han Zongtao, Jiang Hong, Wang Wei, Li Zengyuan, Chen Erxue, Yan Min, Tian Xin. Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Using KNN-FIFS Method Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(9): 70-79.
[2]	Li Lan, Chen Erxue, Li Zengyuan, Ren Chong, Zhao Lei, Gu Xinzhi. Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on Multi-Baseline InSAR Tomography [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(11): 85-93.
[3]	Feng Qi, Chen Erxue, Li Zengyuan, Li Lan, Zhao Lei. Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Method for Rugged Terrain Based on Airborne P-Band PolSAR Data [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(3): 10-22.
[4]	Guo Yun, Li Zengyuan, Chen Erxue, Tian Xin, Ling Feilong. Estimating Forest Above-Ground Biomass in the Upper Reaches of Heihe River Basin Using Multi-Spectral Remote Sensing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(1): 140-149.
[5]	He Peng;Zhang Huiru;Lei Xiangdong;Xu Guang;Gao Xiang. Estimation of Forest Above-Ground Biomass Based on Geostatistics [J]. , 2013, 49(5): 101-109.
[6]	Zeng Weisheng;Xia Zhongsheng;Zhu Song;Luo Hongzhang. Establishment of Tree Volume and Aboveground Biomass Equations for Masson Pine Plantation in Guizhou Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(3): 96-101.
[7]	Yang Chunhua;Zhou Xiaoping;Wang Xiaoming. Regression Models of Above-Ground Biomass of Fargesia nitida in Dengsheng Area in Wolong Nature Reserve [J]. , 2008, 44(3): 113-123.
[8]	Li Weicheng;Sheng Haiyan;Pan Borong;Chang Jie. Self-Similarity Relationship between Component of Shoot and Biomass of Three Hungriness Plants [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(5): 11-16.
[9]	Feng Yulong;Ju Guansheng;Zhu Chunquan. RESPONSES OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND PV-PARAMETERS TO WATER STRESS IN POPLAR CLONE SEEDLINGS [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39(3): 30-36.
[10]	Shengzuo Fang,Shixing LÜ,Xizeng XÜ,Luozhong Tang,Fuliang Cao. STUDIES ON DIRECTIVE SILVICULTURE OF POPLAR VENEER GLUED WOOD IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF CHINA [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1999, 35(6): 120-124.
[11]	Xinsheng Hu,Jianwei Liu,Shiji Wang. COMPARISON OF THE NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS RATE OF FOUR POPLAR CLONES AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY REGIMES [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1997, 33(2): 107-116.
[12]	Liu Jianwei;Liu Yarong;Zhu Chunquan;Wang Shinji;Terence;J. Blake. THE SELECTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF LEAF AREA MODELS FOR CLONES OF POPULUS SPP. [J]. , 1994, 30(6): 481-486.

Relationship Between Leaf Hydraulic and Economic Traits and Biomass of Poplar Clones

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 0

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments