外生激励和价值认同对农户持续参与森林碳汇项目意愿的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210818

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: Forest carbon sequestration and emission reduction is an important part of national carbon trading. As the executors and stakeholder of the forest carbon sequestration project, identifying the endogenous and exogenous factors of farmers' continuous participation in the forest carbon sequestration project is of great significance for the stable promotion of the project and the mitigation of global climate change. Method: Based on the theory of endogenous and exogenous incentives, explore the internal and exogenous factors that influence farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects. This article constructs four dimensions of exogenous incentives of "policy concern", "project subsidy", "model effect" and "carbon sequestration-increasing training", and the three dimensions of "forest land value maximization", "carbon sequestration industry recognition" and "mitigation of climate change" of value recognition. Based on 417 sets of field survey data of farmers who have participated in the first phase of carbon sequestration project of bamboo forest in Suichang and Jingning counties of Zhejiang Province that implemented the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction (CCER). The relationship among exogenous incentives, value recognition and farmers' willingness of continuous participation is analyzed by statistical description. Binary probit model and mediating effect model were used to analyze the direction and extent of the impact of exogenous incentive and value recognition on farmers' willingness to participate in forest carbon sequestration projects and the mediating role of value recognition. Result: The results of cross analysis showed that: the proportion of exogenous incentives and value recognition factors to promote farmers' willingness to participate in the sustainable development was more than 98%. The Chi square test at a significant level of 5% indicated that different exogenous incentive factors and value recognition factors had a significant impact on farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects. The empirical analysis showed that: 1) In exogenous incentives, "policy concern" had positive impacts on farmers' continuous participation at a significance level of 10%, "project subsidies", "role models" and "the carbon sequestration-increasing training" had positive impacts at a significance level of 5%. 2) The "mitigation of climate change" in value recognition had a positive impact on farmers' continuous participation at a significance level of 5%; while "maximum value of forest land" and "recognition of carbon sequestration industry" had no significant impact on farmers' continuous participation. 3) Exogenous incentives had a significant positive impact on value recognition. And value recognition had a significant partial (25.99%) role of mediating between exogenous incentives and farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects. Conclusion: Farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects is the result of joint impact by exogenous incentives and endogenous value recognition. "Policy concern", "project subsidy", "model effect"and"carbon sequestration-increasing training" in the exogenous incentives and "mitigation of climate change"in the value recognition are important factors affecting farmers' continuous participation. Exogenous incentives have a significant positive effect on value recognition, and value recognition has a significant role in partially mediating between exogenous incentives and farmers' continuous participation in carbon sequestration projects.

Key words: forest carbon sequestration project, exogenous incentives, value recognition, farmers, continuous participation willingness

CLC Number:

F307.2

Aiqin Zhu,Lei Gu,Weiqiang Zhu,Yiyong Feng,Wei Chen,Guomo Zhou. Impact of Exogenous Incentives and Value Recognition on Farmers' Willingness of Continuous Participation in Forest Carbon Sequestration Project[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(8): 176-188.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Exogenous incentives, value recognition and farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects"

因素 Factors		问题描述 Factor description	问题回答 (农户数) Answer (Number)	持续参与的农户数(占比, %) Number of continuous participation farmers (Proportion, %)		卡方 Chi square (P)
因素 Factors		问题描述 Factor description	问题回答 (农户数) Answer (Number)	否No	是Yes	卡方 Chi square (P)
外生激励 Exogenous incentives	政策关注 Policy concerns	政府对森林碳汇项目的关注和支持是否重要 Is it important for the government to pay attention to and support the forest carbon sequestration project	不重要No 135	8(5.93)	127(94.07)	13.419(0.000)
	政策关注 Policy concerns		重要Yes 282	1(0.35)	281(99.65)	13.419(0.000)
	项目补贴 Project subsidy	碳汇项目补贴和其他补助及优惠是否重要 Are carbon sequestration subsidies and other subsidies and preferences important	不重要No 114	8(7.02)	106(92.98)	17.543(0.000)
	项目补贴 Project subsidy		重要Yes 303	1(0.33)	302(99.67)	17.543(0.000)
	榜样效应 Model effect	同村人对碳汇项目的态度和参与积极性是否重要 Are the attitude and participation enthusiasm of villagers important	不重要No 144	8(5.56)	136(94.44)	12.022(0.001)
	榜样效应 Model effect		重要Yes 273	1(0.37)	272(99.63)	12.022(0.001)
	增汇培训 Carbon sequestration-increasing training	项目组织的增汇技术培训等是否重要 Is carbon sequestration-increasing training organized by the project important	不重要No 62	5(8.06)	57(91.94)	12.031(0.001)
	增汇培训 Carbon sequestration-increasing training		重要Yes 355	4(1.13)	351(98.87)	12.031(0.001)
价值认同 Value recognition	林地价值最大化 Maximum value of forest land	碳汇项目能提高林地总收入，产生新价值 Carbon sequestration project can increase the total income of forest land and generate new value	不认可No 68	6(8.82)	62(91.18)	17.093(0.000)
	林地价值最大化 Maximum value of forest land		认可Yes 349	3(0.86)	346(99.14)	17.093(0.000)
	碳汇产业认可 Recognition of carbon sequestration industry	碳汇交易是未来发展的一个新产业，愿意率先参与 Carbon exchange trading is a new industry in the future and is willing to take the lead	不认可No 79	7(8.86)	72(91.14)	20.734(0.000)
	碳汇产业认可 Recognition of carbon sequestration industry		认可Yes 338	2(0.59)	336(99.41)	20.734(0.000)
	减缓气候变化 Mitigation of climate change	愿意为缓解全球气候变化做贡献 Willing to contribute to the mitigation of global climate change	否No 79	7(8.86)	79(91.14)	20.734(0.000)
	减缓气候变化 Mitigation of climate change		是Yes 338	2(0.59)	338(99.41)	20.734(0.000)

Table 3

Table 4

Variable meaning and assignment"

变量 Variables		定义和赋值 Definition and assignment	均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation
被解释变量Explained variable
	农户持续参与意愿 Farmers’ willingness to participate continuously	持续参与碳汇项目意愿0=否；1=是 Willingness to continue to participate in carbon sequestration projects 0 = no; 1 = yes	0.98	0.15
解释变量Explanatory variables
外生激励 Exogenous incentives	政策关注 Policy concerns	政府对森林碳汇项目的关注和支持是否重要 0=不重要；1=重要 Is it important for the government to pay attention to and support forest carbon sequestration projects 0 = unimportant; 1 = important	0.68	0.47
	项目补贴 Project subsidy	碳汇项目补贴和其他补助及优惠是否重要 0=不重要；1=重要 Are carbon sequestration subsidies and other subsidies and preferences important 0 = unimportant；1 = important	0.73	0.45
	榜样效应 Model effect	同村人对碳汇项目的态度和参与积极性是否重要0=不重要；1=重要 Is the attitude and participation enthusiasm of villagers important 0 = unimportant; 1 = important	0.65	0.48
	增汇培训 Carbon sequestration-increasing training	项目组织的增汇技术培训等是否重要 0=不重要；1=重要 Is carbon sequestration-increasing training organized by the project important 0 = unimportant; 1 = important	0.85	0.36
价值认同 Value recognition	林地价值最大化 Maximum value of forest land	是否认可碳汇项目能提高林地总收入，产生新的价值0=不认可；1=认可 Whether the carbon sequestration project can increase the total income of forest land and generate new value 0 =no; 1 =yes	0.84	0.37
	碳汇产业认可 Recognition of carbon sequestration industry	是否认可碳汇交易是未来发展的一个新产业，愿意率先参与0=不认可；1=认可 Whether to recognize carbon sequestration trading is a new industry in the future development, and is willing to take the lead 0 =no; 1 =yes	0.81	0.39
	减缓气候变化 Mitigation of climate change	是否愿意为缓解全球气候变化做贡献 0=否；1=是 Willing to contribute to the mitigation of global climate change 0 =no; 1 =yes	0.81	0.39
控制变量Control variables
个体特征 Individual characteristics	年龄 Age/a	连续变量 Continuous variable	55.33	9.97
	受教育程度 Years of education/a	连续变量 Continuous variable	7.25	3.04
	是否兼业 Part-time or not	0=不兼业；1=兼业 0=no; 1=yes	0.49	0.50
家庭特征 Family characteristics	家庭年收入 Annual family income/10⁴yuan	1: ≤5; 2:(5, 10]; 3:(10, 15]; 4: >15	1.85	1.02
	劳动人口数 The amount of labor	连续变量 Continuous variable	2.15	1.24
	是否雇工 Employ workers or not	0=不雇佣工人；1=雇佣工人 0=no; 1=yes	0.39	0.49
	家与村委会距离 The distance between home and village committee/km	连续变量 Continuous variable	1.09	1.25
林地特征 Woodland characteristics	毛竹林占家庭林地比重 The proportion of Moso bamboo forest in domestic forest land(%)	连续变量 Continuous variable	55.82	31.57
林地特征 Woodland characteristics	林地所有权 Property of forest land	0=流转林地；1=集体所分 0=Forest land circulation; 1=Collective division	0.74	0.44

Table 4

Table 5

Regression results of the model of influencing factors for farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects"

变量 Variable			农户持续参与森林碳汇项目 Farmers’ continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration projects
变量 Variable			模型(1) Model(1)	模型(2) Model(2)	模型(3) Model(3)	模型(4) Model(4)
外生激励 Exogenous incentives	政策关注 Policy concerns		0.023^**		0.013^*
	政策关注 Policy concerns		(0.009)		(0.008)
	项目补贴 Project subsidy		0.039^***		0.027^**
	项目补贴 Project subsidy		(0.012)		(0.011)
	榜样效应 Model effect		0.027^***		0.020^**
	榜样效应 Model effect		(0.010)		(0.008)
	增汇培训 Carbon sequestration-increasing training		0.028^**		0.026^**
	增汇培训 Carbon sequestration-increasing training		(0.013)		(0.013)
	外生激励因子 Exogenous incentive factors					0.022^***(0.006)
价值认同 Value recognition	林地价值最大化 Maximum value of forest land			0.033^***	0.015
	林地价值最大化 Maximum value of forest land			(0.012)	(0.009)
	碳汇产业认可 Recognition of carbon sequestration industry			0.027^**	0.005
	碳汇产业认可 Recognition of carbon sequestration industry			(0.013)	(0.008)
	减缓气候变化 Mitigation of climate change			0.030^**	0.024^***
	减缓气候变化 Mitigation of climate change			(0.012)	(0.009)
	价值认同因子 Value recognition factors					0.011^**(0.004)
个体特征 Individual characteristics	年龄Age		-0.000	-0.000	-0.000	-0.000
	年龄Age		(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
	受教育程度Education level		0.002	0.001	0.001	0.001
	受教育程度Education level		(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.001)	(0.001)
	兼业情况Part-time employment		-0.005	-0.016	-0.013^*	-0.012
	兼业情况Part-time employment		(0.009)	(0.011)	(0.007)	(0.009)
家庭特征 Family characteristics	家庭年收入(以5万元以下为参照组)Annual family income(with reference of less than 50 000 yuan)	50 000~100 000	-0.001	0.006	-0.005	-0.002
		50 000~100 000	(0.013)	(0.013)	(0.012)	(0.014)
		100 000~150 000	-0.031	-0.027	-0.038	-0.028
		100 000~150 000	(0.031)	(0.033)	(0.034)	(0.029)
		＞150 000	-0.011	-0.007	-0.006	-0.005
		＞150 000	(0.020)	(0.023)	(0.016)	(0.018)
	家庭劳动人口数 The amount of labor		-0.005	-0.005	-0.002	-0.005
	家庭劳动人口数 The amount of labor		(0.004)	(0.004)	(0.005)	(0.004)
	雇工情况 Employ workers or not		0.031^**	0.031^**	0.020^*	0.022^*
	雇工情况 Employ workers or not		(0.015)	(0.015)	(0.014)	(0.012)
	家距村委会距离 The distance between home and village committee		-0.002	-0.002	-0.003	-0.001
	家距村委会距离 The distance between home and village committee		(0.003)	(0.003)	(0.003)	(0.002)
林地特征 Woodland characteristics	毛竹林占比 Area of Moso bamboo forest		-0.007	-0.000	-0.003	-0.003
	毛竹林占比 Area of Moso bamboo forest		(0.011)	(0.013)	(0.009)	(0.009)
	林地产权 Property of forest land		-0.017	-0.018	-0.020	-0.024^*
	林地产权 Property of forest land		(0.013)	(0.016)	(0.013)	(0.014)
Log pseudolikelihood			-21.963	-26.596	-19.175	-20.010
Pseudo R²			0.494	0.388	0.558	0.537
P			0.003	0.000	0.000	0.000

Table 5

Table 6

References 0

	陈瑶, 张晓梅. 林农参与林业碳汇意愿影响因素分析——基于黑龙江省集体林调研数据. 林业经济, 2018, 40 (8): 98- 103.
	Chen Y , Zhang X M . Analysis on influencing factors of farmers' willingness to participate in forestry carbon sequestration: Based on the survey data of collective forest in Heilongjiang Province. Forestry Economy, 2018, 40 (8): 98- 103.
	陈赵阳. 增进社会主义核心价值体系认同的榜样教育路径. 思想教育研究, 2011, (7): 73- 76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5707.2011.07.020
	Chen Z Y . Model education path to promote the recognition of socialist core value system. Ideological Education Research, 2011, (7): 73- 76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5707.2011.07.020
	邓正华, 张俊飚, 许志祥, 等. 农村生活环境整治中农户认知与行为响应研究——以洞庭湖湿地保护区水稻主产区为例. 农业技术经济, 2013, (2): 72- 79.
	Deng Z H , Zhang J B , Xu Z X , et al. Research on farmers' cognition and behavior response in rural living environment improvement: Taking the main rice production area of Dongting Lake Wetland Reserve as an example. Agricultural Technology Economy, 2013, (2): 72- 79.
	韩雅清, 杜焱强, 苏时鹏, 等. 社会资本对林农参与碳汇经营意愿的影响分析——基于福建省欠发达山区的调查. 资源科学, 2017, 39 (7): 1371- 1382.
	Han Y Q , Du Y Q , Su S P , et al. The impact of social capital on forest farmers' willingness to participate in carbon sequestration: A case study of underdeveloped mountainous areas in Fujian Province. Resources Science, 2017, 39 (7): 1371- 1382.
	洪明慧. 2016. 农户碳汇交易项目评价及参与意愿的影响因素研究. 杭州: 浙江农林大学硕士学位论文.
	Hong M H. 2016. Study on the influencing factors of farmers' carbon sink trading project evaluation and participation willingness. Hangzhou: MS thesis of Zhejiang A&F University. [in Chinese]
	洪明慧, 胡晨沛, 顾蕾, 等. REDD+机制下农户参与森林经营碳汇交易意愿及其影响因素. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34 (2): 207- 214.
	Hong M H , Hu C P , Gu L , et al. Willingness of farmers to participate in carbon sink trading in forest management under REDD+ mechanism and its influencing factors. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34 (2): 207- 214.
	黄宰胜, 陈治淇, 陈钦, 等. 林农碳汇林经营意愿影响因素分析——基于碳汇造林试点地区的实证检验. 生态经济, 2017, 33 (4): 34- 37, 42.
	Huang Z S , Chen Z Q , Chen Q , et al. Analysis of influencing factors of farmers' willingness to manage carbon sequestration forests: An empirical test based on pilot areas of carbon sequestration afforestation. Ecological Economy, 2017, 33 (4): 34- 37, 42.
	计薇, 顾蕾, 范伟青, 等. 碳汇目标下竹林经营经济效益评价与差异分析. 林业经济问题, 2020, 40 (3): 278- 284.
	Ji W , Gu L , Fan W Q , et al. Economic benefit evaluation and difference analysis of bamboo forest management under carbon sequestration target. Forestry Economic Issues, 2020, 40 (3): 278- 284.
	简盖元, 冯亮明, 刘伟平. 森林碳生产的激励机理分析. 林业经济问题, 2012, 32 (1): 46- 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2012.01.009
	Jian G Y , Feng L M , Liu W P . Analysis of incentive mechanism of forest carbon production. Forestry Economic Issues, 2012, 32 (1): 46- 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2012.01.009
	李明月, 罗小锋, 余威震, 等. 代际效应与邻里效应对农户采纳绿色生产技术的影响分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25 (1): 206- 215.
	Li M Y , Luo X F , Yu W Z , et al. Analysis of the effect of neighborhood effect on the adoption of green production technology. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25 (1): 206- 215.
	李怒云, 龚亚珍, 章升东. 林业碳汇项目的三重功能分析. 世界林业研究, 2006, (3): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4241.2006.03.001
	Li N Y , Gong Y Z , Zhang S D . Triple function analysis of forestry carbon sequestration project. World Forestry Research, 2006, (3): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4241.2006.03.001
	李佳, 顾蕾, 朱玮强, 等. 浙江省安吉县CCER竹林经营碳汇交易项目经济效益分析. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35 (4): 581- 588.
	Li J , Gu L , Zhu W Q , et al. Economic benefit analysis of CCER bamboo forest operating carbon sink trading project in Anji county, Zhejiang province. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35 (4): 581- 588.
	明辉, 漆雁斌, 李阳明, 等. 林农有参与林业碳汇项目的意愿吗——以CDM林业碳汇试点项目为例. 农业技术经济, 2015, (7): 102- 113.
	Ming H , Qi Y B , Li Y M , et al. Do forest farmers have the willingness to participate in forestry carbon sequestration project: Taking CDM forestry carbon sequestration pilot project as an example. Agricultural Technology Economy, 2015, (7): 102- 113.
	王昭琪, 苏建兰. 农户参与林业碳汇意愿影响因素分析——以云南省凤庆县镇康县为例. 林业经济, 2015, 37 (5): 32- 37.
	Wang Z Q , Su J L . Analysis on influencing factors of farmers' willingness to participate in forestry carbon sequestration: a case study of Zhenkang county, Fengqing county, Yunnan province. Forestry Economy, 2015, 37 (5): 32- 37.
	危丽, 杨先斌, 刘燕. 农户参与意愿与退耕还林政策的可持续性. 重庆大学学报: 社会科学版, 2006, (6): 29- 35.
	Wei L , Yang X B , Liu Y . Rural households' willingness to participate and the sustainability of the policy of returning farmland to forest. Journal of Chongqing University: Social Science Edition, 2006, (6): 29- 35.
	温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 2004, (5): 614- 620.
	Wen Z L , Zhang L , Hou J T , et al. Mediating effect test procedure and its application. Acta Psychologica, 2004, (5): 614- 620.
	徐志刚, 张炯, 仇焕广. 声誉诉求对农户亲环境行为的影响研究——以家禽养殖户污染物处理方式选择为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26 (10): 44- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.10.006
	Xu Z G , Zhang J , Qiu H G . Impact of reputation appeal on farmers' proenvironmental behavior: a case study of poultry farmers' pollutant treatment options. Chinese Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26 (10): 44- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.10.006
	杨帆, 曾维忠, 张维康, 等. 林农林业碳汇项目参与意愿及其影响因素. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (7): 138- 147.
	Yang F , Zeng W Z , Zhang W K , et al. Foresters' constant participation willingness and affecting factors in forest carbon sequestration project. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (7): 138- 147.
	余威震, 罗小锋, 唐林, 等. 农户绿色生产技术采纳行为决策: 政策激励还是价值认同?. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36 (3): 318- 324.
	Yu W Z , Luo X F , Tang L , et al. Farmers' green production technology adoption behavior decision: Policy incentive or value recognition?. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36 (3): 318- 324.
	朱玮强, 顾蕾, 李佳, 等. 基于B-S期权定价的安吉县CCER竹林经营碳汇项目经济效益评估. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 42 (4): 18- 24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1165.2018.04.003
	Zhu W Q , Gu L , Li J , et al. Economic benefit evaluation of CCER bamboo forest management carbon sequestration project in Anji county based on B-S option pricing. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Science Edition, 2018, 42 (4): 18- 24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1165.2018.04.003
	朱玮强. 2019. 信息不完全背景下农户持续参与森林碳汇交易的驱动机制研究. 杭州: 浙江农林大学硕士学位论文.
	Zhu W Q. 2019. Study on the driving mechanism of farmers' continuous participation in forest carbon sequestration trade under the background of incomplete information. Hangzhou: MS thesis of Zhejiang A&F University. [in Chinese]
	朱臻, 沈月琴, 吴伟光, 等. 南方集体林区森林经营主体碳汇供给的研究进展. 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30 (6): 938- 943.
	Zhu Z , Shen Y Q , Wu W G , et al. Research progress on carbon sequestration supply of forest management entities in southern collective forest regions. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30 (6): 938- 943.
	Deci E L . Effects of externally meadiated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18 (1): 105- 115. doi: 10.1037/h0030644
	Deci E L , Ryan R M . Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 2008, 49 (1): 14- 23. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
	Deci E L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
	Charnley S , Diaz D H , Gosnell H . Mitigating climate change through small-scale forestry in the USA: Opportunities and challenges. Small-Scale Forestry, 2010, 9 (4): 445- 462. doi: 10.1007/s11842-010-9135-x
	Gu L , Wu W G , Ji W , et al. Evaluating the performance of bamboo forests managed for carbon sequestration and other co-benefits in Suichang and Anji, China. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, 106 (6): 101947.
	Markowski-Lindsay M , Stevens T , Kittredge D , et al. Barriers to Massachusetts forest landowner participation in carbon markets. Ecological Economics, 2011, 71, 180- 190. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.027
	Porter L W, Lawler E E. 1968. Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin-Dorsey.
	Raub S , Liao H . Doing the right thing without being told: joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97 (3): 651- 667. doi: 10.1037/a0026736

指标 Index	遂昌县 Suichang county					景宁县 Jingning county
样本村 Sample villeges	北界 Beijie	高坪 Gaoping	金竹 Jinzhu	应村 Yingcun	新路湾 Xinluwan	大漈 Daji	东坑 Dongkeng	景南 Jingnan	澄照 Chengzhao
样本量 Sample size	65	60	30	66	69	35	34	25	33
百分比 Percentage(%)	15.59	14.39	7.19	15.83	16.55	8.39	8.15	6.00	7.91

特征 Features		分类 Classification	样本量 Sample size	占比 Percentage(%)
个体特征 Individual characteristics	年龄 Age/a	≤45	58	13.91
		(45, 60]	229	54.92
		>60	130	31.18
	受教育程度 Education level	小学及以下Primary school and below	178	42.69
		初中Junior middle school	191	45.80
		高中及以上High school and above	48	11.51
	兼业情况 Part-time employment	1=只从事农业 1=Only engaged in agriculture	214	51.32
		2=农业为主，非农为辅 2= Agriculture as the main part and non-agriculture as the supplement	79	18.94
		3=非农为主，农业为辅 3=Non-agriculture as the main part and agriculture as the supplement	89	21.34
		4=只从事非农工作 4=Only engaged in non-agriculture	35	8.39
家庭特征 Family characteristics	家庭年收入 Annual family income/10⁴ yuan	≤5	205	49.16
		(5, 10]	119	28.54
		(10, 15]	45	10.79
		>15	48	11.51
	劳动人口数 The amount of labor	0	13	3.12
		(0, 2]	341	81.77
		>3	63	15.11
	雇佣工人数 Number of employed workers	0	256	61.39
		1	159	38.13
		>1	2	0.48
	家与村委会距离 The distance between home and village committee/km	≤1	308	73.86
		(1, 2]	60	14.39
		(2, 5]	47	11.27
		>5	2	0.48
林地特征 Woodland characteristics	毛竹林面积 Area of Moso bamboo forest/hm²	≤0.67	186	44.60
		(0.67, 2]	153	36.69
		>2	78	18.71
	林地产权 Property of forest land	1=集体所分 1=Collective division	283	67.87
	林地产权 Property of forest land	0=林地流转 0=Forest land circulation	134	32.13

变量 Variable	模型(5) Model(5)		模型(6) Model(6)		模型(7) Model(7)		中介效应占比 Proportion of mediating effect
	持续参与 Continuous participation		价值认同 Value recognition		持续参与 Continuous participation
	系数 Coefficient	标准误 Std.error	系数 Coefficient	标准误 Std. error	系数 Coefficient	标准误 Std.error
外生激励因子 Exogenous incentive factors	0.044^***	0.01	0.335^***	0.05	0.033^***	0.01	25.99%
价值认同因子 Value recognition factors					0.034^***	0.01	25.99%
控制变量 Control variable			已控制 Controlled
R²	0.112		0.183		0.157

[1]	Fanbin Kong,Hua Ruan,Wenmei Liao. Income Effects and Influence Factors of Different Poor Rural Households' Loan Behavior with Forest Property Rights Mortgage——Based on 702 Households' Survey Data from 5 Provinces in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(10): 111-123.
[2]	Zheng Jing, Lin Huiqi. Forest Farmers’ Cognition and Its Influence Factors of Commercial Forest Redemption in Key Ecological Location ——Based on Case Study from Fujian Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(9): 114-124.
[3]	Gao Lan, Xu Dongmei. Influence of Individual Endowment and Cognition on the Behavior of Farmers in Forestland Circulation: Based on the View of Intention-Behavior Consistency [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(7): 137-145.
[4]	Kong Fanbin, Ruan Hua, Liao Wenmei, Qin Keqing. Impact of Rural Labor Transfer on the Farmers' Socialized Service Demand in the Forestry: Survey Data of 1 407 Households on Production Process [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(6): 132-142.
[5]	Lü Weilin, Wen Zuomin. Study on the Entrepreneurial Psychology and Behaviors of Forest Farmers Based on Prospect Theory [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(5): 134-145.
[6]	Yang Fan, Zeng Weizhong, Zhang Weikang, Zhuang Tianhui. Foresters' Constant Participation Willingness and Affecting Factors in Forest Carbon Sequestration Project [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(7): 138-147.
[7]	Liao Wenmei, Kong Fanbin, Lin Ying. The Impact of Labor Transfer Level on Input and Output of Household Forestland-Based Production——Empirical Analysis Based on 1178 Households in Jiangxi Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(12): 87-95.
[8]	Zhao Jing, Li Tingting, Shen Jinyu, Wen Yali. The Performance Evaluation of the Collective Forest Property Right System Reform and the Impact Analysis on Farmers’ Will of Forest Management：a Case Study Based on the Data of Households Collected from Yong’an City of Fujian Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(6): 138-146.
[9]	Shen Jinyu, Hou Yilei, Wu Jing, Wen Yali. Factors Affecting Households' Intentions in Choosing Different Forest Management Models: A Case Study in Sanming, Fujian [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(11): 138-146.
[10]	Kong Fanbin;Liao Wenmei. Relationships between the Woodland Fragmentation, Farmers' Investment and Forest Productivity in the Reform of Collective Forest Property Right System: An Empirical Analysis of 602 Households Survey in 8 Counties of Jiangxi Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(4): 119-126.
[11]	Xu Xiuying;Shi Daojin;Yang Songkun;Li Chaozhu. Analysis on Forestland Transferring and the Affecting Factors: A Case Study in Linan and Anji County in Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(9): 149-157.
[12]	Wang Wenlan. How the Reform of Collective Forest Rights System Influences Farmers Forestry Income [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(8): 141-146.
[13]	Xie Yi;Wen Yali;Gong Peichen. Reasonableness of Farmers Transfer Benefits in the Reform of Collective Forest Property Rights System： [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(10): 134-140.

Impact of Exogenous Incentives and Value Recognition on Farmers' Willingness of Continuous Participation in Forest Carbon Sequestration Project

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 0

Related Articles 13

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments