林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (10): 141-149.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20260117
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
宋秀玲1,冯源恒2,3,胡拉2,3,颜培栋2,3,徐惠兰2,3,胡颖1,刘宁4,杨章旗1,2,3,*(
)
收稿日期:2026-02-27
出版日期:2026-10-10
发布日期:2026-10-16
通讯作者:
杨章旗
E-mail:yangzhangqi@163.com
基金资助:
Xiuling Song1,Yuanheng Feng2,3,La Hu2,3,Peidong Yan2,3,Huilan Xu2,3,Ying Hu1,Ning Liu4,Zhangqi Yang1,2,3,*(
)
Received:2026-02-27
Online:2026-10-10
Published:2026-10-16
Contact:
Zhangqi Yang
E-mail:yangzhangqi@163.com
摘要:
目的: 基于湿地松与加勒比松测交遗传设计试验的子代测定数据,解析湿加松生长性状的遗传变异规律,筛选具有高配合力的优良亲本与具有杂种优势的杂交组合,为湿地松与加勒比松的杂交育种方案制定及优良家系筛选提供可靠理论依据和材料基础。方法: 以27个湿加松家系(6×5测交设计,缺失3个杂交组合)为研究材料,测定15年生时的树高、胸径和单株材积,采用方差分析估计遗传参数,通过解析配合力和估算杂种优势开展亲本评价与优良杂交组合筛选。结果: 湿加松15年生时的树高、胸径和单株材积平均值分别为18.87 m、22.64 cm和0.42 m3,平均超亲优势分别为9.42%、19.29%和87.62%。胸径和材积在父本、母本及父母本交互效应上均表现出极显著差异,而树高仅在母本间存在显著差异。树高、胸径和单株材积的家系遗传力分别为0.26、0.29、0.27,受中等程度遗传控制。在树高性状上,父母本交互效应>母本效应>父本效应,一般配合力(GCA)效应大于特殊配合力(SCA);在胸径和材积性状上,父母本交互效应的方差分量接近母本效应与父本效应之和,父本效应明显大于母本效应,SCA效应大于GCA。胸径和材积的父本加性贡献显著高于母本,而树高则母本贡献更大。树高、胸径和单株材积的母本GCA分别为–
中图分类号:
宋秀玲,冯源恒,胡拉,颜培栋,徐惠兰,胡颖,刘宁,杨章旗. 基于测交设计的湿加松生长性状遗传分析及优良家系选择[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(10): 141-149.
Xiuling Song,Yuanheng Feng,La Hu,Peidong Yan,Huilan Xu,Ying Hu,Ning Liu,Zhangqi Yang. Genetic Analysis of Growth Traits in Pinus elliottii × P. caribaea Based on a Test-Cross Design and Selection of Superior Families[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(10): 141-149.
表2
湿加松生长性状的方差分析"
| 变异来源 Variance source | 自由度 df | 树高 Tree height | 胸径 DBH | 单株材积 Individual volume | ||||||||
| 均方MS | F | P | 均方MS | F | P | 均方MS | F | P | ||||
| 区组Block | 4 | 20.344 | 3.28 | 0.012 | 54.87 | 2.22 | 0.067 | 1.59 | 0.177 | |||
| 母本Female | 5 | 30.574 | 4.93 | 0.000 | 120.94 | 4.90 | 0.000 | 0. | 4.00 | 0.002 | ||
| 父本Male | 4 | 33.144 | 5.34 | 0.000 | 373.64 | 15.14 | 0.000 | 0. | 13.90 | 0.000 | ||
| 母本×父本Female×male | 17 | 11.150 | 1.80 | 0.029 | 73.80 | 2.99 | 0.000 | 2.52 | 0.001 | |||
| 区组×母本×父本Block×female×male | 68 | 6.586 | 1.06 | 0.365 | 23.252 | 0.94 | 0.606 | 0.84 | 0.804 | |||
表3
湿加松生长性状总体表现及主要遗传参数①"
| 性状 Traits | 方差分量 Variance component | 表型变异数 Phenotypic coefficient of variation | 遗传变异系数 Genetic coefficient of variation | 家系遗传力 Family heritability | 单株遗传力 Individual heritability | ||||
| 树高Tree height | 14.34 | 5.49 | 0.26 | 0.16 | |||||
| 胸径DBH | 25.70 | 13.67 | 0.29 | 0.27 | |||||
| 单株材积Volume | 62.28 | 30.65 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||||
表4
杂交亲本配合力方差分析①"
| 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 树高 Tree height | 胸径 DBH | 单株材积 Individual volume | |||||
| 均方MS | F | 均方MS | F | 均方MS | F | ||||
| 区组Block | 4 | 2.58* | 0.67 | 0.58 | |||||
| 母本一般配合力Female parent GCA | 5 | 2.27 | 1.63 | 1.55 | |||||
| 父本一般配合力Male parent GCA | 4 | 2.06 | 2.89* | 3.03* | |||||
| 特殊配合力SCA | 17 | 1.77* | 3.03** | 2.62** | |||||
| 机误Error | 303 | ||||||||
表5
杂交亲本配合力方差分量①"
| 配合力组分 Variance components of combining ability | 树高 Tree height | 胸径 DBH | 单株材积 Individual volume |
| 母本一般配合力方差 Variance of female parent GCA | 0.336 2 | 1.033 8 | 0.001 7 |
| 父本一般配合力方差 Variance of male parent GCA | 0.220 1 | 2.468 7 | 0.005 0 |
| 一般配合力方差 Variance of GCA | 0.556 3 | 3.502 5 | 0.006 7 |
| 特殊配合力方差 Variance of SCA | 0.437 0 | 4.444 9 | 0.007 7 |
表6
杂交亲本生长性状一般配合力"
| 亲本 Parent | 一般配合力 General combining ability | |||
| 树高 Tree height/m | 胸径 DBH/cm | 单株材积 Individual volume/m3 | ||
| 母本 Female parent | S6 | 0.833 8 | 0.913 1 | 0.047 6 |
| S7 | 0.613 4 | 2.289 5 | 0.100 5 | |
| S10 | 0.253 1 | –1.071 7 | –0.047 1 | |
| S12 | –1.211 9 | –3.163 9 | –0.122 3 | |
| S13 | –0.736 6 | 0.580 5 | 0.000 6 | |
| S16 | 0.248 2 | 0.452 5 | 0.020 7 | |
| 父本 Male parent | H3 | 0.487 7 | 2.337 9 | 0.104 0 |
| H8 | 0.179 0 | –0.459 8 | –0.023 8 | |
| H9 | –0.829 9 | –0.916 7 | –0.054 6 | |
| H18 | –0.176 7 | –3.434 7 | –0.129 2 | |
| H22 | 0.533 3 | 1.300 7 | 0.060 2 | |
表7
杂交亲本生长性状特殊配合力"
| 杂交组合 Cross combination | 特殊配合力 Special combining ability | 杂交组合Cross combination | 特殊配合力 Special combining ability | |||||
| 树高 Tree height/m | 胸径 DBH/cm | 单株材积 Individual volume/m3 | 树高 Tree height/m | 胸径 DBH/cm | 单株材积 Individual volume/m3 | |||
| S6×H3 | 1.460 6 | 2.185 8 | 0.126 3 | S12×H3 | –0.249 4 | 0.841 3 | 0.016 0 | |
| S6×H8 | 0.433 5 | 3.685 5 | 0.130 5 | S12×H9 | 0.062 9 | 0.669 5 | 0.028 2 | |
| S6×H9 | –0.335 3 | –0.923 3 | –0.049 1 | S12×H18 | –0.040 3 | 0.837 5 | 0.045 9 | |
| S6×H18 | –0.515 9 | 0.030 4 | –0.002 0 | S12×H22 | 0.212 2 | –1.635 4 | –0.070 4 | |
| S6×H22 | –1.236 3 | –3.805 9 | –0.162 2 | S13×H3 | –0.789 9 | –4.109 5 | –0.185 5 | |
| S7×H3 | –0.741 4 | –2.184 6 | –0.099 2 | S13×H8 | 0.936 0 | 2.868 1 | 0.122 1 | |
| S7×H8 | –0.954 5 | –4.524 2 | –0.180 3 | S13×H9 | –1.652 3 | –1.804 9 | –0.076 6 | |
| S7×H9 | 1.401 3 | 2.597 9 | 0.106 2 | S13×H22 | 1.136 2 | 0.784 2 | 0.054 3 | |
| S7×H22 | –0.075 5 | 1.848 7 | 0.087 6 | S16×H3 | 0.398 7 | 1.861 9 | 0.086 4 | |
| S10×H3 | –0.078 5 | 1.405 2 | 0.056 0 | S16×H8 | –1.165 9 | –4.163 8 | –0.151 0 | |
| S10×H8 | –0.460 9 | –1.029 6 | –0.043 6 | S16×H9 | 0.117 7 | –1.039 5 | –0.040 9 | |
| S10×H9 | 0.405 7 | 0.500 4 | 0.032 2 | S16×H18 | 0.149 7 | 1.521 1 | 0.036 6 | |
| S10×H18 | 0.283 2 | 0.481 0 | 0.020 7 | S16×H22 | 0.306 4 | 2.992 9 | 0.112 5 | |
| S10×H22 | –0.343 0 | –0.184 5 | –0.021 8 | |||||
表8
杂交组合生长性状的多重比较①"
| 杂交组合 Cross combination | 树高 Tree height | 胸径 DBH | 单株材积 Individual volume | |||||
| 均值 Mean/m | 超亲优势 Heterosis (%) | 均值 Mean/cm | 超亲优势 Heterosis (%) | 均值 Mean/m3 | 超亲优势 Heterosis (%) | |||
| S6×H3 | 21.46 ± 2.46 a | 23.28 | 27.35 ± 5.00 a | 41.94 | 0.67 ± 0.30 a | 180.32 | ||
| S6×H8 | 20.13 ± 1.87 ab | 15.61 | 26.05 ± 3.70 abc | 35.21 | 0.54 ± 0.15 abcd | 128.39 | ||
| S6×H9 | 18.35 ± 1.70 bcd | 5.39 | 20.98 ± 3.93 bcde | 8.91 | 0.33 ± 0.14 cdef | 40.05 | ||
| S6×H18 | 18.82 ± 2.04 abc | 8.11 | 19.42 ± 5.00 de | 0.80 | 0.31 ± 0.21 def | 28.47 | ||
| S6×H22 | 18.81 ± 2.30 abc | 8.05 | 20.32 ± 4.70 cde | 5.46 | 0.34 ± 0.20 cdef | 40.73 | ||
| S7×H3 | 19.04 ± 3.01 abc | 5.43 | 24.35 ± 6.40 abcd | 33.60 | 0.49 ± 0.28 abcde | 117.77 | ||
| S7×H8 | 18.52 ± 3.54 abc | 2.54 | 19.22 ± 3.14 de | 5.42 | 0.29 ± 0.15 def | 25.84 | ||
| S7×H9 | 19.86 ± 2.10 ab | 10.00 | 25.88 ± 4.62 abc | 41.98 | 0.54 ± 0.21 abcd | 138.33 | ||
| S7×H22 | 19.75 ± 2.37 abc | 9.38 | 27.35 ± 7.29 a | 50.04 | 0.64 ± 0.34 ab | 180.65 | ||
| S10×H3 | 19.34 ± 2.40 abc | 2.71 | 24.58 ± 5.80 abcd | 25.55 | 0.50 ± 0.25 abcde | 91.02 | ||
| S10×H8 | 18.65 ± 0.35 abc | –0.96 | 19.35 ± 1.90 de | –1.17 | 0.28 ± 0.05 def | 4.55 | ||
| S10×H9 | 18.51 ± 3.00 abc | –1.71 | 20.42 ± 3.90 cde | 4.31 | 0.32 ± 0.15 cdef | 21.69 | ||
| S10×H18 | 19.04 ± 1.90 bcd | 1.11 | 17.89 ± 3.42 e | –8.65 | 0.23 ± 0.11 ef | –11.08 | ||
| S10×H22 | 19.12 ± 2.80 abc | 1.55 | 21.96 ± 5.24 abcde | 12.13 | 0.38 ± 0.17 bcdef | 44.79 | ||
| S12×H3 | 17.71 ± 3.30 bcd | 5.70 | 21.93 ± 6.20 abcde | 27.57 | 0.39 ± 0.30 bcdef | 105.11 | ||
| S12×H9 | 16.70 ± 2.68 cd | –0.30 | 18.50 ± 3.55 e | 7.64 | 0.24 ± 0.13 ef | 27.57 | ||
| S12×H18 | 17.25 ± 2.90 bcd | 2.99 | 16.15 ± 1.97 e | –6.04 | 0.18 ± 0.07 f | –2.58 | ||
| S12×H22 | 18.21 ± 1.50 bcd | 8.73 | 18.41 ± 3.70 e | 7.13 | 0.26 ± 0.12 ef | 36.15 | ||
| S13×H3 | 17.64 ± 2.80 bcd | 10.40 | 20.72 ± 4.50 cde | 10.93 | 0.31 ± 0.13 def | 66.52 | ||
| S13×H8 | 19.06 ± 2.62 abc | 19.27 | 24.90 ± 3.90 abcd | 33.31 | 0.49 ± 0.19 abcde | 163.39 | ||
| S13×H9 | 15.46 ± 3.80 d | –3.24 | 19.77 ± 3.86 de | 5.85 | 0.26 ± 0.13 ef | 39.71 | ||
| S13×H22 | 19.61 ± 2.65 abc | 22.74 | 24.58 ± 5.20 abcd | 31.58 | 0.50 ± 0.27 abcde | 172.13 | ||
| S16×H3 | 19.81 ± 2.00 ab | 25.10 | 26.56 ± 6.44 ab | 53.77 | 0.60 ± 0.34 ab | 259.06 | ||
| S16×H8 | 17.94 ± 2.40 bcd | 13.28 | 17.74 ± 3.40 e | 2.69 | 0.24 ± 0.12 ef | 40.74 | ||
| S16×H9 | 18.21 ± 2.00 bcd | 15.01 | 20.41 ± 3.70 cde | 18.13 | 0.31 ± 0.15 cdef | 88.14 | ||
| S16×H18 | 18.90 ± 2.10 abc | 19.34 | 20.45 ± 2.14 cde | 18.38 | 0.32 ± 0.09 cdef | 89.88 | ||
| S16×H22 | 19.77 ± 1.90 abc | 24.81 | 26.66 ± 5.44 ab | 54.31 | 0.58 ± 0.26 abc | 248.45 | ||
表9
湿加松优良组合选择评价①"
| 杂交组合 Cross combination | 平均值±标准差 Means±SD | 显著性 Sig. | 母本一般配合力 Female GCA | 父本一般配合力 Male GCA | 特殊配合力 SCA | 超亲优势 Heterosis (%) | 遗传增益 Genetic gains (%) |
| S6×H3 | 0.67 ± 0.30 | a | 0.047 6 | 0.104 0 | 0.126 3 | 180.32 | 16.07 |
| S16×H22 | 0.58 ± 0.26 | abc | 0.020 7 | 0.060 2 | 0.112 5 | 248.45 | 10.29 |
| S6×H8 | 0.54 ± 0.15 | abcd | 0.047 6 | –0.023 8 | 0.130 5 | 128.39 | 7.71 |
| S7×H9 | 0.54 ± 0.21 | abcd | 0.100 5 | –0.054 6 | 0.106 2 | 138.33 | 7.71 |
| S13×H8 | 0.49 ± 0.19 | abcde | 0.000 6 | –0.023 8 | 0.122 1 | 163.39 | 4.50 |
|
陈安娜, 张建珠, 唐红燕, 等. 湿加松扦插试验及扦插苗管理技术探讨. 林业科技通讯, 2024, (2): 80- 83.
doi: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2023.04.26.0003 |
|
|
Chen A N, Zhang J Z, Tang H Y, et al. The cuttage experiment and the discussions on cutting seedling management techniques of Pinus elliotii × P. caribaea. Forest Science and Technology, 2024, (2): 80- 83.
doi: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2023.04.26.0003 |
|
|
董虹妤, 刘青华, 周志春, 等. 马尾松子代生长杂种优势与亲本配合力、遗传距离的相关性. 林业科学, 2017, 53 (2): 65- 75.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170208 |
|
|
Dong H Y, Liu Q H, Zhou Z C, et al. Correlation between heterosis in the growth of progeny and combining ability and genetic distance of the parents for Pinus massoniana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53 (2): 65- 75.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170208 |
|
| 郝自远. 2021. 基于基因表达量遗传调控的鹅掌楸属种间杂种优势机理研究. 南京: 南京林业大学. | |
| Hao Z Y. 2021. Study on the mechanism of interspecific heterosis in Liriodendron based on the inheritance and regulation of allele expression level. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
|
金国庆, 秦国峰, 刘伟宏, 等. 马尾松生长性状交配效应的遗传分析及杂交组合选择. 林业科学, 2008, 44 (6): 28- 33.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.06.006 |
|
|
Jin G Q, Qin G F, Liu W H, et al. Effects of mating manners on growth traits of Pinus massoniana and selection of cross combinations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44 (6): 28- 33.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.06.006 |
|
|
李义良, 赵奋成, 刘 阳, 等. 湿加松亲本间SNP遗传距离与生长性状杂种优势关系研究. 植物研究, 2021, 41 (5): 738- 743.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.05.012 |
|
|
Li Y L, Zhao F C, Liu Y, et al. Relationship between parental genetic distance and heterosis of growth traitsin Pinus elliottii × P. caribaea var. hondurensis based on SNP marker. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41 (5): 738- 743.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.05.012 |
|
|
李周岐, 王章荣. 鹅掌楸属种间杂种苗期生长性状的亲本配合力分析. 西北林学院学报, 2001, 16 (3): 7- 10, 17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2001.03.002 |
|
|
Li Z Q, Wang Z R. Combining ability analysis of six parents diallel cross of Liriodendron. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2001, 16 (3): 7- 10, 17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2001.03.002 |
|
|
林 彦, 罗建中, 翟江博, 等. 桉树杂交种的配合力遗传分析及育种亲本选择. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45 (11): 19- 27.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2025.11.003 |
|
|
Lin Y, Luo J Z, Zhai J B, et al. Heredity analysis on combining ability and the selection of breeding parents of Eucalyptus hybrids. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45 (11): 19- 27.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2025.11.003 |
|
| 凌金燕. 2024. 马尾松生长性状遗传参数估算及基因型与环境互作研究. 桂林: 广西师范大学. | |
| Ling J Y. 2024. Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interactions of growth traits in Pinus massoniana. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University. [in Chinese] | |
| 刘 宇, 徐焕文, 滕文华, 等. 白桦全同胞子代测定及优良家系早期选择. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39 (2): 1- 8. | |
| Liu Y, Xu H W, Teng W H, et al. Full-sib progeny test and early selection in superior families of Betula platyphylla. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39 (2): 1- 8. | |
|
刘青华, 金国庆, 储德裕, 等. 基于马尾松测交系子代的生长、干形和木材密度的配合力分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35 (2): 8- 14.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.002 |
|
|
Liu Q H, Jin G Q, Chu D Y, et al. Genetic analysis on combining ability of growth, stem form and wood basic density of Pinus massoniana by testcross mating design. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35 (2): 8- 14.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.002 |
|
| 栾启福, 姜景民, 张建忠, 等. 火炬松×加勒比松F1代生长、树干通直度和基本密度遗传和配合力分析. 林业科学, 2011, 47 (3): 178- 183. | |
| Luan Q F, Jiang J M, Zhang J Z, et al. Estimation of heritability and combining ability for growth, stem-straightness and wood density of the F1 generation of Pinus taeda × P. caribaea. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47 (3): 178- 183. | |
|
潘艳艳, 许贵友, 董利虎, 等. 日本落叶松全同胞家系苗期生长性状遗传变异. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43 (2): 14- 22.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803038 |
|
|
Pan Y Y, Xu G Y, Dong L H, et al. Genetic variations of seedling growth traits among full-sib families of Larix kaempferi. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2019, 43 (2): 14- 22.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803038 |
|
|
尚福强, 王云鹏, 马晓雨, 等. 红松全同胞家系生长性状遗传变异规律及选择. 西部林业科学, 2025, 54 (1): 37- 43, 57.
doi: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2025.01.006 |
|
|
Shang F Q, Wang Y P, Ma X Y, et al. Genetic variation and selection of growth traits of full-sib families of Pinus koraiensis. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2025, 54 (1): 37- 43, 57.
doi: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2025.01.006 |
|
| 孙明升. 2021. 亲本间遗传距离对松树种间杂交可育性与子代杂种优势的影响. 南宁: 广西大学. | |
| Sun M S. 2021. Study on the effect of genetic distance between parents on fertility of interspecific hybridization of pines and heterosis of progeny. Nanning: Guangxi University. [in Chinese] | |
|
王 哲, 邓乐平, 龙永彬, 等. 基于SLAF-seq技术的湿加松遗传多样性和遗传结构分析. 林业与环境科学, 2025, 41 (1): 1- 8.
doi: 10.20221/j.cnki.2096-2053.202501001 |
|
|
Wang Z, Deng L P, Long Y B, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity and genetic structure of the population of Pinus elliottii × P. caribaea based on SLAF-seq technology. Forestry and Environmental Science, 2025, 41 (1): 1- 8.
doi: 10.20221/j.cnki.2096-2053.202501001 |
|
| 王 哲, 赵奋成, 龙永彬, 等. 2026. 湿地松×加勒比松F2代生长表现分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 50(5): 77–84. | |
| Wang Z, Zhao F C, Long Y B, et al. 2026. Growth performance analysis of the F2 generation of Pinus elliottii ×P. caribaea var. hondurensis. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 50(5): 77–84. [in Chinese] | |
|
邢晓文, 罗建中, 卢万鸿, 等. 杂种优势及其在重要林木树种的研究进展. 桉树科技, 2021, 38 (4): 40- 46.
doi: 10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2021.04.007 |
|
|
Xing X W, Luo J Z, Lu W H, et al. Heterosis and its research progress in important tree species. Eucalypt Science & Technology, 2021, 38 (4): 40- 46.
doi: 10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2021.04.007 |
|
|
邢雪梅, 宋瑞珂, 孙国飞, 等. 杂种落叶松多点稳定性分析及优良家系选择. 东北林业大学学报, 2025, 53 (7): 16- 26.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2025.07.003 |
|
|
Xing X M, Song R K, Sun G F, et al. Multi-site stability analysis and excellent family selection of hybrid larch. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2025, 53 (7): 16- 26.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2025.07.003 |
|
| 续九如. 2006. 林木数量遗传学. 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
| Xu J R. Tree population genetics. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
|
杨章旗. 我国南方松树杂交育种研究进展及发展趋势. 广西林业科学, 2001, 30 (4): 183- 185.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2001.04.005 |
|
|
Yang Z Q. Advance and development trends of hybrid breeding in south China. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2001, 30 (4): 183- 185.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2001.04.005 |
|
| 袁晓峰. 2012. 鹅掌楸杂交组合选择及无性系苗期测定. 南京: 南京林业大学. | |
| Yuan X F. 2012. Selection of cross combinations & clonal test at nursery stage for hybrid Liriodendron. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
|
赵奋成, 林昌明, 吴惠姗, 等. 湿地松×洪都拉斯加勒比松生长性状遗传参数年度变化趋势及相关分析. 林业与环境科学, 2018, 34 (2): 1- 12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2018.02.001 |
|
|
Zhao F C, Lin C M, Wu H S, et al. Age trends and correlation analysis of genetic parameters on growth traits in Pinus elliottii var. elliottii× P. caribaea var. hondurensis. Forestry and Environmental Science, 2018, 34 (2): 1- 12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2018.02.001 |
|
|
周怀勋, 张明慧, 银彬吾, 等. 桂西南国外松优良家系早期选择. 广西林业科学, 2025, 54 (4): 400- 409.
doi: 10.19692/j.issn.1006-1126.20250406 |
|
|
Zhou H X, Zhang M H, Yin B W, et al. Early selections of superior exotic pine families in southwestern Guangxi. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2025, 54 (4): 400- 409.
doi: 10.19692/j.issn.1006-1126.20250406 |
|
| 朱之悌. 1990. 林木遗传学基础. 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
| Zhu Z D. 1990. The basis of tree genetics. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
|
Bottani S, Zabet N R, Wendel J F, et al. Gene expression dominance in allopolyploids: hypotheses and models. Trends in Plant Science, 2018, 23 (5): 393- 402.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.002 |
|
|
Dong L M, Xie Y H, Sun X M. Full-diallel-based analysis of genetic parameters for growth traits in Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi). New Forests, 2020, 51 (2): 261- 271.
doi: 10.1007/s11056-019-09729-6 |
|
|
Gauzere J, Klein E K, Brendel O, et al. Using partial genotyping to estimate the genetic and maternal determinants of adaptive traits in a progeny trial of Fagus sylvatica. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2016, 12 (6): 115.
doi: 10.1007/s11295-016-1062-3 |
|
|
Jansson G, Li B. Genetic gains of full-sib families from disconnected diallels in loblolly pine. Silvae Genetica, 2004, 53 (1/6): 60- 64.
doi: 10.1515/sg-2004-0011 |
|
|
Kaviriri D K, Yang L, Zhao C L, et al. Morphological growth performance and genetic parameters on Korean pine in Northeastern China. Silvae Genetica, 2023, 72 (1): 34- 48.
doi: 10.2478/sg-2023-0004 |
|
|
Li S C, Li J Q, Pan Y Y, et al. Variation analyses of controlled pollinated families and parental combining ability of Pinus koraiensis. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32 (3): 1005- 1011.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01168-w |
|
|
Li Z M, Gao C J, Li J, et al. Variation in growth traits and early evaluation of the selection of intra and interspecific hybrid progeny of Pinus yunnanensis. New Forests, 2025, 56 (1): 14.
doi: 10.1007/s11056-024-10084-4 |
|
|
Liu W W, Zhang Y L, He H, et al. From hybrid genomes to heterotic trait output: challenges and opportunities. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2022, 66 (2): 102193.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102193 |
|
|
Liu X T, Lu Z M, Wu J G, et al. Comparison of genetic impact on growth and wood traits between seedlings and clones from the same plus trees of Pinus koraiensis. Journal of Forestry Research, 2023, 34 (2): 469- 480.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01480-7 |
|
|
Qu C, Kao H N, Xu H, et al. Functional significance of asymmetrical retention of parental alleles in a hybrid pine species complex. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2024, 62 (1): 135- 148.
doi: 10.1111/jse.12953 |
|
|
Zheng C H, Dai J F, Zhang H J, et al. Family selection and evaluation of Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii (Mayr.) Pilger based on stem analysis data at multiple sites. Journal of Forestry Research, 2023, 34 (5): 1627- 1638.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01589-9 |
| [1] | 李思缘,高胜,胡建军,凌杰,陈赢男. Bt转基因杨杂交子代苗期生长性状综合评价与筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(6): 154-165. |
| [2] | 郭臣臣,李旗,李思缘,王泽民,陈赢男,韦素云,胡建军. 杨树杂交子代苗期动态生长性状的全基因组选择[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(1): 32-41. |
| [3] | 赵浩博,丰忠平,郑成忠,邱勇斌,安林辉,金国庆,张振. 柏木生长性状的家系-环境互作效应及其关键影响因子[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(6): 120-129. |
| [4] | 张静, 张伟溪, 丁昌俊, 褚延广, 苏晓华, 赵军, 苏雪辉, 苑正赛, 李政宏, 余金金, 黄秦军. 美洲黑杨亲本及其不同林龄及生长势子代叶片糖代谢的差异[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(5): 131-145. |
| [5] | 贺茜茜,杨万霞,尚旭岚,孙操稳,张雷,方升佐. 基于水溶性多糖积累量的青钱柳叶用林优良家系筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(11): 24-34. |
| [6] | 姜清彬,孟景祥,李保军,陈海军,方碧江,郭朗,田生辉. 8年生火力楠半同胞家系遗传评价与选育[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(1): 104-114. |
| [7] | 魏瑞研,张卫华,徐放,林元震. 红锥生长性状的全基因组选择与优良子代早期评选[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(12): 83-91. |
| [8] | 董琳琳, 张国成, 刘立辉, 计家宝, 白向东, 顾宸瑞, 姜静, 刘桂丰. 白桦四倍体与二倍体杂交的亲本配合力分析[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(9): 75-84. |
| [9] | 车晓亮,刘天颐,王哲,曾明,李铨年,赵奋成,吴惠姗,郭文冰. 不同增脂剂对广东湿加松人工林产脂量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(8): 123-132. |
| [10] | 史月冬,郑宏,叶代全,施季森,边黎明. 杉木生长性状的空间与竞争效应及其对遗传参数估计的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(5): 75-84. |
| [11] | 肖德卿,罗芊芊,范辉华,邱群,周志春. 栽植模式对木荷幼林生长和形质性状家系变异影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(5): 85-92. |
| [12] | 曹德美,张亚红,成星奇,项晓冬,张磊,胡建军. 青杨不同种群叶片表型性状的遗传变异[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(8): 56-67. |
| [13] | 王云鹏,张蕊,周志春,黄少华,马丽珍,范辉华. 木荷优树自由授粉家系早期生长性状遗传变异动态规律[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9): 77-86. |
| [14] | 郭丽,张亮,李蓬勃,刘福,王越,孔祥波,张苏芳,张真. 不同栽培方式对4种黑杨派无性系生长及对春尺蠖抗性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 193-202. |
| [15] | 温月仙, 甘红豪, 史胜青, 江泽平, 吴利禄, 褚建民. 基于叶绿体和核基因片段序列的甘蒙柽柳谱系地理研究[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(1): 55-64. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||